Let us be honest. Islam’s ideology is immoral to its core. Should we ask the Haigue and U.N. to rule

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you give any actual examples (passages from the bible, for example)? Preferably new-testament, given the OT is "satisfied" by Christs death?

Christ's death?

Is God not eternal?

To your deflection.
Are you saying that Jesus did not advocate as I showed?

Regards
DL
 
Do you respect the US Constitution?

What does that have to do with this discussion?

Unless you think the U.S. constitution and the ideology it promotes to be as immoral as Islam's ideology.

Or was this just your way of deflecting from an uncomfortable truth?

Regards
DL
 
Your statement, then, isn't that "Islam" is immoral... but that ALL religion is immoral...

I do not know all religions well enough to say that.
But I can say that both Islam and Christianity have ideologies that seem to come more from a Satan than a God.

Regards
DL
 
The US Constitution specifically may not promote ideology. Why don't you read it sometimes?

Are you a "Christian" because you can hide behind it and not be bothered to think rationally? You're a troll.
 
The US Constitution specifically may not promote ideology. Why don't you read it sometimes?

Are you a "Christian" because you can hide behind it and not be bothered to think rationally? You're a troll.

Idiot. I am not a Christian and the constitution promotes it's own ideology.

Do you have more stupid remarks for us?

Regards
DL
 
The US Constitution supports slavery. Thus, using your logic, if you support the US Constitution, you support slavery.

Why do you support slavery?

It did, but the 13th amendment fixed that, didn't it?

The 1st Council of Nicaea abolished some of the books in the "bible", too. Does that not figure into your rants, DL?
 
Do you think that anyone who follows the US Constitution therefore supports slavery? After all, many white supremacist groups quote that very section to justify their claims of their own supremacy over blacks.

You tell me. It is your constitution and not mine.

The U.S., like most countries, is an oligarchy.

It is likely then that slavery is a part of the U.S. mentality.

We are all owned by our oligarch owners.

Regards
DL
 
It did, but the 13th amendment fixed that, didn't it?

The 1st Council of Nicaea abolished some of the books in the "bible", too. Does that not figure into your rants, DL?

Editing goes on all the time and Christian plagiarism is well known.

Regards
DL
 
Christ's death?

Is God not eternal?

To your deflection.
Are you saying that Jesus did not advocate as I showed?

Regards
DL

I am not saying anything - I am asking you to provide substantive evidence that what you claimed is true.
 
How does educating the public about the levels of morality of the various religions make anything worse?
Are there other areas of thought that you think humanity should deny itself the truth?
Funny, you argue initially "declare war against this immoral ideology" and to transform the already corrupted de Hague court into some openly progandistic Volksgerichtshof or so (the point of a court is organized violence - to imprison people - don't forget about this).

I object against the further corruption of de Hague, which would make it completely useless (who would care at all about what a Western Volksgerichtshof decides, if its decisions are on the same level as NYT articles?) and you object that I'm somehow against education? Educate the public as much as you can, you have all the Western press, a media power big enough to distribute any truth.

The actual problem is that this media power is increasingly used to distribute open lies. Which destroys its value and its power. So, no need for UN or de Hague - all you need is to stop to lie, to tell only the truth in the Western media.
 
It is likely then that slavery is a part of the U.S. mentality.

It is. We get it from Christians.

See, here's the problem: Given this much opportunity to actually make a rational case in support of your title thesis, or some aspect of your proposition―

We, the collective of the free world, must move the war to one of words that judge the ideologies for their moral worth, and seek to live by the best one. That verdict will determine the will of the free world as to which direction we free people wish the world to evolve to; in terms of the limits of freedom and the duty of free people.

―you have either failed or refused to even try.

If you actually have a rational case, present it.

I know, I know, that's so unfair because it requires more effort than wallowing in guttermuck. But, you know, life's unfair, dude. Do you have anything other than your own temporal, earthly judgment and heart full of cruelty? The manner of empowerment you seek is unhealthy by any measure.
 
GIA - at this point, I think a simple ultimatum is fair.

Answer, directly, the questions posed to you, or this thread will be locked and cesspooled as the flamebait, closed-minded fear-mongering, ethnocentrism, religious intolerance, and trolling it has every appearance of being.

I believe 24 hours is plenty of time...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top