The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Michael 345 couldn't find any. And Michael 345 looked very hard

Michael 345 did find this



Think it refers to Post 519

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Still enough Edit time to add courtesy of Post 522

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

AND another edit to add a short relevant musical interlude

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Yak yak yak... The point is Mr. Exchemist, that I said in post #519 that:

... George Hammond is in fact a modern day
"Michael Faraday", only Hammond has discovered
that an army of psychologists measuring millions of
people worldwide with Personality and IQ tests for so
50 years has discovered something called the "GFP"
(General Factor of Psychology) and can't figure out
what it is! Hammond, being a physicist, immediately
figured out and PROVED that the GFP is actually the
"God of the Bible".

Fact is, that no one gives a damn whether Davy did or didn't fire Faraday. For chrissakes this thread is all about whether or not 1000 psychology researchers worldwide using desktop computers for 50 years have or have not, succeeded in experimentally measuring and proving the existence of the God of the Bible (a.k.a. "the GFP"). Only a halfwit would be concerned with such a picayune fact as to whether "Davy did or did not fire Faraday", for chrissakes! Wise up Mr. Exchemist, and get back on topic and say something of on topic and of scientific relevance, rather than posting a bunch of moronic BS !

And BTW this turn of events makes me actually another "Maxwell", not another Faraday ! Since I actually am the one who proof that the army of psychologists have actually experimentally confirmed "the God of the Bible", and not the "General Factor of Psychology".

How about saying something intelligent about that?
It's later than you think!

George

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Right, so you can't support your claim that Davy fired Faraday. As I thought, it's bullshit.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The first quote is absurd and wrong.

 

That's the only thing I'm disputing.

No. The question is whether or not Newton used the word "cube". Again, every cube may be a quadrature but every quadrature is not necessarily a cube. The words are not interchangeable.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

The Flintstones mentioned it too. Proof!

 

As did Newton when the apple fell on his head

But Fred said it first

Yabba Dabba Doo

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
I NEVER SAID NEWTON USED THE WORD "CUBE "!
I said: "Newton said that he had reduced the
problem to a quadrature (cube).
I put the word (cube) in parentheses to indicate
that it was an example of a "quadrature".

I NEVER said that Newton actually used the word cube!

I SUGGEST YOU GO BOWLING IF
YOU WANT TO SCORE POINTS

George

 

[Hammond said:]
Since I actually am the one who proved that the army of psychologists have actually experimentally confirmed "the God of the Bible", and not the "General Factor of Psychology".

[And Hammond said:]
How about saying something intelligent about that?

​

[GE Hammond MS physics]
well congratulations Origin, you've lived up to your avatar name, and actually said something original and penetrating right to the core of this entire thread! In fact you're the only one who has !
Unfortunately as relevant and penetrating as your statement is, it turns out to be WRONG, since Hammond's statement is actually CORRECT
... Look, Origin, according to 1000 worldwide psychologists who spent $100-million over 50 years testing millions of people with Personality and IQ tests, and in all the data there are 13 lower order eigenvectors which are "personality types" and Hammond identifies as the "12 Olympian gods" of antiquity, and there is one final TOP eigenvector which the psychologists have dubbed the "GFP", which means "general factor of personality" if only personality tests are used, or is called the "Gen. factor of psychology" if IQ tests are included also.
... Okay, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if the lower order eigenvectors are simply "Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Porky pig, Bugs Bunny, etc. etc.", it will mean that the final top eigenvector "the GFP", we must be "Big Bird" himself, that is "the God of the Bible" or:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

The "GFP", the God of the Bible

Believe me, 40 years of study, 2 degrees in physics,
and peer-reviewed publication, and a personal meeting with Hans Eysenck himself the world's most famous living psychologist, tells me I am
NOT WRONG about this.

George

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
And this is just a reminder of who is the author of this thread.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

____Hans Eysenck________George Hammond___
_____________Montreal 1996_________________

George

 

Michael 345 has concluded someone, postings in this thread, has cornered the market on blowing trumpets about one's self

So Michael 345 will content himself with blowing (strike that) humming his own Kazzoo



Let's strike up the vibrating membrane to Michael 345

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Many anticipate that God has omnipresence property. So we need to find HIM in all things and beings. I previously thought it be either prime force or a perfect balance state of all things and beings like a centre line in a wave. Just speculating logically.

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
...Welcome KUMAR5. How refreshing and totally surprising it is to hear from someone on this forum who is actually polite !
... I did discover that you are located in India and notice that you post frequently in "genetics and biology". Are you a biologist or medical doctor or something like that?
... I also notice that your post indicates a degree of respect for religion. Are you a Hindu or Buddhist by birth? I myself am a Christian Protestant by birth.
... Anyway as to your question about the "omnipresence property" of God, YES my discovery of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" (SPOG) certainly confirms absolutely that God is omnipresent . The reason for this is that my theory proves that the size and speed difference between the "genotypic body" that lives inside our actual "phenotypic body" is actually the scientific origin and cause, of the entire "phenomenon of God"! In other words that the (unexpressed but subconsciously known) "genotypic body" is actually the location and identity of God himself, and is therefore always "with us", therefore we naturally opine that God "is omnipresent". The explanation is as simple as that! Hope this answers your question.
... In closing, let me say I am certainly looking forward to hearing from you further.

George

 

Hello George,
I like to discuss various subjects based on logics and sicience. I feel both of these should be covered for better understanding. I am Hindu by birth and believe in spirituality.

Sorry, I am not of view that Genotype can be exoressed as Gid because it is finite and exist only in bbeings not in things. Whereas God with Omni properties ( presence, science and potence) should have infinite properties and present in all things and beings. So He can be just be in prime force form and his state being a oerfect balance state of all things and beings. Other than prime force (yet to understood in science) nothing other can be be omnipresent.

Yes secondary to god or say son of god or god incarnation etc can also be expressed as godlike, holding some properties of god.

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
How refreshing and exciting to talk to a non-Christian about God, for a change!
... I am curious as to your scientific credentials? What about your scientific education?
Do you have any formal education in science, or academic degrees? – Or scientific training of any kind?

[GE Hammond MS physics]
The "genotype of Man ", unlike the "phenotype of Man" has the property of "eternal life", which is actually the property of perceiving "zero time dilation" (a.k.a. reality), whereas the phenotype (our every day ordinary body) is subject to an unbeknownst "perceptual time dilation" and annoying "space magnification" ranging from 15% to as much as 30% in some highly growth stunted individuals This is what causes the terrifying "Sound And The Fury" of the world seen by the phenotypic body, whereas the genotypic body (God himself) sees a heavenly, tranquil, easily mastered, world ! Zero time dilation, and zero space magnification, is the scientific definition of "eternal life".

[GE Hammond MS physics]
The "genotype" of Man is "God", while the "phenotype" of Man is the "Son of God", so called ! It's really all quite simple, once you understand the scientific proof and explanation of God.!
... There is really no mystery to it anymore, scientifically speaking.

[GE Hammond MS physics]
... But tell me about " Vishnu and, Brahma", is Brahma the Hindu equivalent of the Christian God? Is Vishnu the Hindu equivalent of the Christian "Devil"? And furthermore, in the pre-Christian West there were 13-gods (personality types), how many "gods (with a little "g")" are there
in the Hindu religion?

George

 

Oh god

Now we have little god(s) from other religions mixed in with the 7 foot and a bit big god

Also add genetics with buzz words genotype - phenotype

Don't forget scientific content with zero time dilation and perceptual time dilation

What would my favourite drinking partner say about all this

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
postscript message to: KUMAR5

It further occurs to me that the "Hindu Trimurti" of "Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva" may be the theoretical Hindu counterpart of the Christian Trinity of "Father, Son, Holy Ghost".
Any ideas about that?

George

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
That was the Big Bird God not the "big bit God", your voice dictation is inaccurate!
... And BTW the terms "genotype–phenotype" are taught in high school biology class!

George

 

I have no idea about this connection. But I feel they are indeoendent and ist forms of Prime firce or Parmatma.

 

YOU used the word "cube". And then you used Newton to try to back up your mistake.

Again, a cube may be an example of a quadrature but every quadrature is not a cube. What we were originally discussing, the brain, is NOT a cube.

And yet you backpedaled when I called you on it.

You're trying to play goalie when I'm bowling.

You could just admit you were wrong when you used the word "cube".