If you consider things like prejudice, this is where the consciousness tool, which observes and processes social reality, is induced out of calibration. We might look at individuals and judge them using the consciousness tool bias, but can't see the individual data point for what it is. Yet, one is often unaware of this bias, especially if it is collective and most people slant the same way. To be in touch with reality, if a biased tool culture, full calibration will make one appear to the out of reality based on group calibration.
When the earth was considered flat, this created a collective bias in the consciousness tool. Based on that bias, one would look at reality in ways that would be consistent with that bias, such as an edge at the end of the earth. Their may even be a huge water fall.
We have two main political parties in the US, each of which sees social reality differently. Both have a programmed biased and both are unconscious of this bias, but assume this is reality due to the weight of each collective membership. This type of tool bias is created by data manipulation. Each side presents truth, but only part of the whole truth. This like using only the data points you like after doing an experiment. Each side then uses sound logic to draw the best curve through their cherry picked data. This curve is consistent with logic, so it is assumed true. But what is missed is, it uses only partial data, therefore the curve does not reflect reality, since reality uses all the data. Both sides can't see the other, since their consciousness tool bias is left or right.
Science is not exempt from the tool bias, since there is no rule in the scientific method that requires tool calibration. When science looks at things of the mind, beyond the box that separates the frontiers of the mind, from accepted science, it does not include all the data people have witnessed in the first person, but assumes third person data is the only data you need. The logic uses a partial data set to create a bias. Dream details do no exist in this world perception since they can't be seem in the third person, and are not part of the curve bias.
Manmade global warming is based on a biased consciousness tool. The reason is based on the laws or rules of R&D, which are a practical extension of the laws of science. Manmade global warming has no precedent in history, since this has never happened before in the 6 billion year history of the earth. This concept is like a prototype car, that has yet to be driven one mile in historical reality, to collect data (there is no precedent). The bias assumes we know everything about something (man made impact on global weather) that has never occurred before in the history of the earth. R&D does not work that way when dealing with untested prototypes. Only salesmen work this way.
If I said I have a new car concept that can get 200 mpg. Would you buy this car without seeing a direct experiment of this untested concept that has no precedent? The answer is no, unless there is already direct data from previous experiments that show the scaled up concept is valid. Global warming wants you to buy an untested car and take their word of it, This none R&D based sales pitch can work if you can bias the tool of consciousness so it can't see this development rules violation.
Development science is different from pure science, in that it has additional reality constraints that appear when you try to scale things up from the lab to full scale production; from greenhouse test to the globe. The skipping of steps is why it is not panning out as predicted. They have skipped all the R&D steps extrapolated from the philosophy of science.
An interesting question is why do consciousness tools, bias left, in terms of political orientation, make it easier to accept manmade global warming? This biased side of the political consciousness tool, accept this easier. This group is less self reliance and tends to be more of a herd, that takes orders from a centralized power and recites it like chants and jingles. Right bias is more self reliance and business, which will not buy from salesmen until the product is supported by sound development data. This oversight could lead to being fired or your company being put into a hole. The scale up data is not sufficient to make good predictions as one sees at each deadline and milestone.
