Xev as Moderator... :rolleyes:

Should we keep Xev as the moderator of General Philosophy?

  • Yes, keep Xev.

    Votes: 13 65.0%
  • No, let's vote for a new moderator.

    Votes: 7 35.0%

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You were questioning the nature of spirituality, I think that could fit in parapsychology.
 
Arditezza said:
I don't think it's the moderators job to shuffle threads around all the time. A poster that has as many posts as Truthseeker, should know what forum is appropriate for his post and post it there himself, not expect Xev to nanny up for him. Posters that post in the wrong forums are either lazy or stupid and deserve to be deleted.
It wasn't the wrong forums.... :rolleyes:

As for banning Xev... as long as Fetus remains standing, she looks a lot like God in comparison... so she stays.
WellCooked is by very far much better than Xev..... :rolleyes:


ElectricFetus said:
You were questioning the nature of spirituality, I think that could fit in parapsychology.
What do you define as parapsychology?
Besides, as long as there is an argument, it can go to the philosophy section....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Surely you could put it in philosophy but Xev does not want it there, so try somewhere else.
 
ElectricFetus said:
Arditezza,

Thank you for putting me above Xev in evilness, I'm flattered, but facts are that Xev has had more banish, impeachment and complaints polls then I have, though I have been trying to catch up. :D

By the way do you believe we should give special treatment to members just because they have a high post count?

Xev has been around a lot longer than you have. So to compare the amount of "ban" threads started about her is really stupid. It took only a week or so for yours to begin. While I don't like Xev as a moderator, she's a much better moderator, more fair, less shady, far more intelligent and exceedingly more interesting than you are.

I was not putting you above her, I think that you are worse than 99% of the posters here and that you are nowhere near being worthy of a moderator position. People feel sorry for you, and that is why you get the minimal things you do get. People stick up for you, because they assume you are too stupid to stick up for yourself and aren't armed with the tools needed to make it through life. They are probably right. Before you count your chickens, you should really take a look at just how close your ban thread was and learn from it.
 
Oh...! I didn't realize there was another Fetus moderator.... :D


ElectricFetus said:
Surely you could put it in philosophy but Xev does not want it there, so try somewhere else.
So just because she doesn't want it, I can't do it?
Sounds like totalitarianism.... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Basically it is. You can try arguing with Xev or a supermod to have it reopened and/or moved, but the chances of you getting Xev impeached and the next mod reopening it are even less likely. I don't understand why Xev close it but there is not much that you or even I could do about it.
 
Yeah.... I guess we don't have a democracy here..... :rolleyes:
Altough most people seem confortable with this totalitarianism.... :rolleyes:
 
No we don't have a democracy here, it’s a psuedo-democratic dictatorship.
Its not that people are happy about it its just that this forum in general is not bad, and is one of the most lenient of them all. So you can live with the flaws or find another forum.
 
Well.... at least I try to change and not just sit down and let others rule the world and do whatever they want...
 
So denying free speech is the same as "following the rules".......

Who says you have freedom of speech? This is a messageboard, not a constitutional democracy.

Oh...! So we should just accept everything and conform to that?

Submit, bitch.

That explains a lot...

No shit. My parents sold me to a lesbian couple when I was fourteen, they chained me to a radiator and wouldn't let me loose except to dress me up in skimpy outfits and sing for their industrial-metal band. I lost my virginity to the bassist, but they found out and had him castrated. It was really sad.

You are the first person to ever tell me about love. So I wrote this poem for you:

Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong
 
Xev said:
Damn, you got me. I think you're hot, Truthseeker. I grew up in a very deprived environment, so I associate abuse with love. Thus I mock you, thinking that I am displaying my affection. Although I taunt you for being weak, I *really* just want to ride your juicy meatstick.

Xev said:
Are you suggesting that my love for Truthseeker is a snide jab at a popular belief, rather than an all-consuming fire that lights my heart and fills my days with joy? You're not a real woman, but a fat old slob living in her parent's basement, jealous of the passion and desire I have to consume the quality man-flesh of this hunky he-god.

Xev said:
Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong
Christ woman you just made my stomach contents take a trip to my mouth..

This is like the Twilight Zone.
Arditezza said:
As for banning Xev... as long as Fetus remains standing, she looks a lot like God in comparison... so she stays.
Definitely the Twilight Zone.

TruthSeeker said:
This thread. Why the heck she closed it!? Like.... can she just close whichever thread she doesn't like!? Is that fair at all for other people?
Well you're still around and we still have to put up with you, so where's the fairness in that? And yes she can close the thread if it does not belong in the philosophy section. Moderator's do have that power.

TruthSeeker said:
Besides, we can always argue wheter there are things that are not physical or not. Just because everything that we know of is physical, doesn't mean there isn't something that is not physical. If you say that, you commit Argumentum ad ignorantiam......
You are the last, the absolutely last person alive or dead on this Earth and Universe to be accusing others of presenting arguments from ignorance.

TruthSeeker said:
But in the thread in particular, the argument was that there is a direct correlation between spiritual activity and good health.
Really? And yet even the Pope is sounding and looking like a vegetable.

TruthSeeker said:
Yeah.... I guess we don't have a democracy here.....
Altough most people seem confortable with this totalitarianism....
Idiot.
 
Xev said:
Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong
lol, homecooked or stolen ?
 
Except that Kid, for him I have prepared a poem…

For longer then I can remember
I have been looking for someone like you
Some one with a head like yours
And a torso to
Birds sing
And your going to pay!
The end

Here some meat covered in barbecue sauce!!! *Throws hot meat at person of affections, meat begins to burn off flesh*
Tak; Invader Zim: season 1, episdoe18: Tak the Hideous New Girl

Sound familiar?
 
Wow so many people think I'm that bad, I should be more like Xev for better comparison: I should say things like "Submit, bitch." and give off profane virtual slaps to the head rudely declaring my authority over you.
 
Xev said:
Who says you have freedom of speech? This is a messageboard, not a constitutional democracy.
How sweet....

Submit, bitch.
Submit what?

You are the first person to ever tell me about love. So I wrote this poem for you:

Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong
If I was really the first person to tell you about love, I wouldn't be surprised that you actually like me. But...! I wouldn't go into the psychology behind that. Whatever...


Bells said:
Well you're still around and we still have to put up with you, so where's the fairness in that? And yes she can close the thread if it does not belong in the philosophy section. Moderator's do have that power.
Yes, they do have the power to close threads with a bunch of useless insults, but they should not close threads just because they don't like it or because it is on the wrong place. They should just move it if it is on the wrong place. Otherwise, that's throwing away free speech!

You are the last, the absolutely last person alive or dead on this Earth and Universe to be accusing others of presenting arguments from ignorance.
You don't even know what the argument is about....!

Really? And yet even the Pope is sounding and looking like a vegetable.
Maybe that is related to his age.......?
Cum hoc ergo propter hoc....

Really? What a great argument.... :rolleyes:
Argumentum ad hominem

Let's see the definition of "idiot"!

"id·i·ot ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-t)
n.
1. A foolish or stupid person.
2. A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive. "

Huuuuumm.... who is really an "idiot"...?

Well... I guess neither one of us fall under that... ;)


airavata said:
Are you being sarcastic?
If not, you've confirmed that you're a panzy idiot faggot.
I was talking about WCF, no EF.....


And I don't really know EF, so I don't really have an opinion on him/her....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top