find another thing to do instead of incessantly wasting other people's time.
Great response to the grade school math with the blocks. ROFL
It is all MY fault that you spend time responding to posts that you apparently cannot understand.
find another thing to do instead of incessantly wasting other people's time.
Great response to the grade school math with the blocks. ROFL
It is all MY fault that you spend time responding to posts that you apparently cannot understand.
That's not generally something conspiracy theorists can do. They just don't do math, or logic, or evidence. Their strategy is generally:Explain using simple English what you think happened and offer evidence.
Even entry-level conspiracists tend to have an idea of what they think is being conspired.That's not generally something conspiracy theorists can do.
Good point. Trolls don't try to convince anyone of their thesis; they just want to cause trouble on forums.psihacklolpwn1 doesn't even seem to have that. By any measure, he doesn't even rise to the level of conspiracy theorist; merely conspiracy troll.
The explanation is already sitting there for your perusal. Read the previously-linked snopes article on this particular conspiracy rubbish.Nonsense. I endorse all the essentials presented in that Wikispooks article. No 'flouncing' from me. Start with the very first section fingering 'lucky' Larry Silverstein as way too 'lucky' by far. He obviously had prior knowledge, and high-level direction and assistance/facilitation from fellow tribal insiders. It's utterly appalling he and kin enormously profited financially and got away scot-free while thousands (later - millions in ME) of innocents died terrible deaths.
Go ahead Dave C - super shill. Make your best case Larry's multiple cases of extraordinary 'luck' (timely purchases, miraculous absence on the day) was just rolling 'good fortune'. Nothing special.
Since you claim I'm the crazy conspiracy theorist with no real evidence - explain why Larry's luck was 'really just normal' - in objective-not-cheap-rhetorical DETAIL!
Is this your way of engineering a life ban? Drawing me into resuming discussion of an aspect of 9-11 that thanks to both your's and bell's anti-true-free-speech threats/warnings, I'm FORBIDDEN to talk about! All I can and will 'safely' say is the Snopes article is imo very narrow in its focus and very weak even there.The explanation is already sitting there for your perusal. Read the previously-linked snopes article on this particular conspiracy rubbish.
Explanation from the article: "It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings."Leaving you all with link to a brief article (nice pictures - worth a thousand words in themselves) to just maybe think honestly about:
https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm
It's your way of engineering a life ban, is it not?Is this your way of engineering a life ban?
You would say that, of course, because it's all join-the-dots when you're a conspiracy theorist. Everything has to be connected to the conspiracy - somehow. If it doesn't seem to connect at first, you can always find a way to shoehorn it in.All I can and will 'safely' say is the Snopes article is imo very narrow in its focus and very weak even there.
There are "official" conspiracy theory posters here? Who appointed them?The other pro Official Conspiracy Theory posters here...
You mean like crashing some large jets laden with fuel into buildings? That does tend to weaken them.... have been given ample material establishing the true smoking gun re physical evidence of massive incendiary usage to weaken the WTC towers prior to collapse.
Flounce again? Are you for real this time, or will you be back again, only to flounce yourself out yet again?Over and OUT.
I have spent more than a few minutes doing so, whereas you once again home in to cherry pick anything seemingly bolstering the Official Story.Explanation from the article: "It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings."
Maybe just honestly think about that for a few minutes.
How so? YOU revived that topic. Irresponsibly - given YOU had issued several stern warnings to drop it! Such a hypocrite.It's your way of engineering a life ban, is it not?
Says you.You would say that, of course, because it's all join-the-dots when you're a conspiracy theorist. Everything has to be connected to the conspiracy - somehow. If it doesn't seem to connect at first, you can always find a way to shoehorn it in.
Don't play dumb yet again.There are "official" conspiracy theory posters here? Who appointed them?
Or do you mean there's an Official Conspiracy Theory? What made it official? Who made it official? Whose offices are you deferring to, specifically?
And that jet fuel - what was left of it following the massive fireballs upon impact - somehow explains all the molten steel found for weeks after?! Still playing real dumb.You mean like crashing some large jets laden with fuel into buildings? That does tend to weaken them.
Ha ha ha ha. James R has picked up the latest derogatory buzz word doing the rounds here. Well done!Flounce again? Are you for real this time, or will you be back again, only to flounce yourself out yet again?
As predicted, you couldn't stay out. Ha ha ha! Well Done!Ha ha ha ha. James R has picked up the latest derogatory buzz word doing the rounds here. Well done!
You presume too much. And your accusations are baseless and basically just provocative dung droppings.It's completely ridiculous that conspiracy theorists are still trotting out the same tired arguments 20 years on from the events, especially as those arguments were all addressed and debunked at the time.
Talk about being stuck in a fantasist's time warp. Don't you guys have anything better to do? There are plenty of new vaccine conspiracies you could promote, for instance. At least that's sort of new(ish). What about 5G causing Covid, or something?
(Actually, I appreciate that you actually don't have anything better to do. When conspiracy theories are your life, you believe in all of them, and I guess that's how you spend a lot of your time. JFK this week. UFOs next week. Injecting bleach to cure Covid the week after. Opus Dei and the Templars the week after that. Big Pharma. The Illuminati. The mind just skips from one to the next. As it gets tired of one, it moves to the next for a while, knowing that the other one will still be there to revist 2 or 5 or 20 or 60 years on. This is your life.)
You lot stop replying to me, and I'll gladly reciprocate. Well, let's see.As predicted, you couldn't stay out. Ha ha ha! Well Done!
I know, it is so odd. It is clear to me that Q-reeus is a reasonably intelligent fellow and yet here he is supporting this silly conspiracy crap. It boggles my mind...It's completely ridiculous that conspiracy theorists are still trotting out the same tired arguments 20 years on from the events, especially as those arguments were all addressed and debunked at the time.
Explain using simple English what you think happened and offer evidence.
Nothing there proves it was molten steel rather than molten aluminum. There were plenty of people who said they saw weakened and bent steel, which is exactly what you would expect after a 1000C fire. There were plenty of rivers of molten metal; also exactly what you would expect, since aluminum melts at 600C. The eyewitness accounts confirm that they saw molten metal. Zero of those accounts prove it was molten iron.I will take a raft of eyewitness testimony to the presence of massive quantities of flowing and pooled molten steel, persisting in places for weeks after 9-11-2001:
https://off-guardian.org/2016/10/01...-no-evidence-of-high-temps-in-the-wtc-rubble/
It is not going unnoticed that you're continuing to evade the issue.Figuring out what could and could not happen versus BELIEVING what happened are very different things.
Accurate data on initial conditions is mandatory.
I am not interested in BELIEVING ANYTHING!
BELIEF is for MORONS!