Ha ha ha ha. 'Pitchers' don't tend to be clear. The very first photo you will encounter on that already provided link:
That will, of course, be entirely up to you. I see you're already sticking your toe in the waters of anti-semitism again, perhaps testing to see how far you can get it in there before a shark bites it off. That's dangerous behaviour, but we will assume you are well aware of what you are doing and choosing to do it anyway. It's not like you weren't warned about the likely consequences (three times, so far!)
I'm sorry. Are you threatening me? On what specific basis actually? Anything you'd like to discuss with me re my recent 9-11 specific posts btw?
There isn't ANY easy explanation. I've made that point way back this thread.
Love to overuse that flounce word huh. New to the shill brigade's vocab.There is. It is not steel. But thanks for confirming you know jack-shit about it, just like the reason for the WTC7 "demolition"
Haha - what a load of bollocks. Aluminium, copper both used in buildings, tons of airplane.
Aluminium, copper both used in buildings, tons of airplane.
No. Aluminium not steel.
Nope.
No silly, that's not molten is it.
Of the orange girders? Not molten, silly.
They weren't partially melted they were distorted. Learn the difference.
Hmmm. I'm going with aluminium mixed in with tons of burnt shite in a slurry. I'm going with trapped rubble surrounded by hot fire creating a foundry effect. What I am not going with is your cretinous claim that it was loads of "failed to ignite thermite" bollocks. Cheers for showing that 20 years on and you're still stuck in the land of woo.
Go flounce.
Great! Finally an actual claim! Congratulations on your decision to articulate your claims!
This is exactly what you'd expect when a quarter billion tons of rapidly falling debris destroys girders. All that energy is transformed to heat, noise and mechanical energy; it has more than enough energy to partially melt the girders as it crushes them.
Wrong and for the same set of reasons already delivered to Dave C. You want a thorough, rigorous debunking of the dross-covered aluminum 'theory' (too good a word, but anyway)?Great! Finally an actual claim! Congratulations on your decision to articulate your claims!
Those "rivers of molten steel" were rivers of molten aluminum mixed with burning trash. (They are also what people saw flowing out of the upper floors of the building.) A metallurgist could probably tell the difference; firefighters can't.
Below is a good example of molten aluminum. Note that the aluminum in the crucible is glowing orange due to the dross (waste) on its surface - but note that the stream of metal being poured is silvery.
You should know much better than to try that one. Even without doing any sums, it's screaming obvious from the very many stills and vids of WTC 1 & 2 collapses, there is massive dispersal of energy going on. Not some bizarre anti-entropy concentration! Read the above linked article! If you are at all serious about respecting the whole truth, take your time over it before responding back here.
Sure, let's hear it!
Exactly. E=1/2MV^2. Do the math for a quarter billion tons of material falling 1300 feet. You'll be amazed at how much energy that represents, all released in under 20 seconds. Again, more than enough to spot-melt parts of girders that were under all that wreckage.
So assume that it is centered at a point half way up the tower. Now do the math.
So you can't even do the math. Fair enough.