DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
For reference (i.e. anyone else Googling for a new term), it is forbs, or phorbs, not forbes.
(I've ever heard of forbs before)
(I've ever heard of forbs before)
You're wrong.No, you do not have the the Canadian prairies.
oopsFor reference (i.e. anyone else Googling for a new term), it is forbs, or phorbs, not forbes.
(I've ever heard of forbs before)
Wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) interbreed quite successfully. After our shit-for-brains government ran the wolves out of Yellowstone and the nearby recreational areas, they went in the only direction that was open to them: north. Once in Canada, they began moving east, where they discovered a thriving population of coyotes. They've been hybridizing for many generations, and the result is a population of canines that have the coyotes' cleverness and lack of fear of humans, but much larger than the average coyote.No one said anything about the critters being fertile. That is a whole nother barrel of fish. The likelihood that a forced hybrid creature will be able to reproduce is pretty much zero. All right. Maybe my focus is too narrow. Hybridizing between separate species normally results in infertile offspring, such as mules. What are you thinking of when you talk about fertile hybrids?
...
On the plus side, these new immigrants will give us a lot of help with our deer problem.![]()
Right. Point made.where they discovered a thriving population of coyotes. They've been hybridizing for many generations, and the result is a population of canines that have the coyotes' cleverness and lack of fear of humans, but much larger than the average coyote.
The eradication of predators, in general, does not improve the health or size of a herd. When the wolves were driven out of Yellowstone, the elk multiplied rapidly. There were so many that they ate all the edible plants down to their roots, then swam into the rivers and lakes and began eating the aquatic foliage.Here, in east central Iowa we have a different deer problem. I had 3 tags this year and only took 2 shots( got a doe and a 10 pt.buck). The january antlerless season was canceled. They are trying to rebuild the herd.
Most feral canines are fairly intelligent and quasi-domesticated. They understand that as long as they don't attack people, we'll be too lazy to do anything about them. The same is true about attacking our dogs. They take a few cats, but not too many because they can climb.I have actually met a coywolf, in broad daylight, not 30 yards from me. And I live in suburban megalopolis.
They're herbivores - unlikely to resemble humans in taste or texture. A long-lived omnivore - bear, swine - would be first guess.I read somewhere years ago that the closest thing to eating human meat is eating elephant. I did a google search but can't find a reference.![]()
It was private ranchers who got the wolves removed from most of their former range, and they didn't go anywhere - they were killed. Grey Wolf range already included the entire eastern half of the US from Hudson Bay to Florida (some subspecies involved, and possibly even a native dog in the southeast), and the hybridizing among canids in the Eastern woodlands was probably due to shortage of local wolves (killed off) rather than immigration.After our shit-for-brains government ran the wolves out of Yellowstone and the nearby recreational areas, they went in the only direction that was open to them: north. Once in Canada, they began moving east, where they discovered a thriving population of coyotes.
Gee darn.Don't worry, this is a bunch of hype, it's not going to happen any time soon.
Huh? What are you talking about?Don't worry, this is a bunch of hype, it's not going to happen any time soon.
Huh? What are you talking about?
You can be sure that, right now, some enthusiastic paleontologist is studying the DNA of a well-preserved mammoth. If it seems compatible with elephant DNA, the next step is obvious.
Yes, there's just that niggling little detail of the biological engineering to get it to actually work....If it seems compatible with elephant DNA...
Step 1. Study Mammoth DNA.Huh? What are you talking about?
You can be sure that, right now, some enthusiastic paleontologist is studying the DNA of a well-preserved mammoth. If it seems compatible with elephant DNA, the next step is obvious.
That makes sense. Quite honestly, I do recall where I read it - on a "Ripley's believe it or not poster" hung above my bead circa 1972 - probably not the best resource. Supposedly, the observation was based on reports by cannibals that had tried both. Since they are probably all dead by now I guess we will never know.They're herbivores - unlikely to resemble humans in taste or texture. A long-lived omnivore - bear, swine - would be first guess.
Step 1. Study Mammoth DNA.
Step 2. ?
Step 3. Open Mammoth Zoo