plakhapate,
At preesent there are 12 months having different days for each month.
Every year we have to see the calender.
Also date and days are different for every month.
Instead of this consider 7 days /week, 4 weeks/month and 13 months/year
This becomes 364 days.
Every year we shoud have holiday as year ending day as extra day.
During leap year we can have extra holiday after year ending day.
Thus 1st of every month will be always on Monday.
Since there are 4 weeks/month, every month will be identical.
That all makes sense.
13th Month can be named as Thirteenember
This . . . not so much. This month could also be called Undecember. The old Roman calendar had ten months and didn't have July or August. This made December the tenth month of the year — hence the name, which translates into "tenth month" ("Decem-" meaning "ten"). "Undecember" would translate to "eleventh month" ("Undecem-" meaning "eleven"). Thus, Undecember would be the theoredical eleventh month of the Roman calendar, and therefore the thirteenth month of this new calendar.
Year Ending Day can be named as YEDAY (Date will be 29th Thirteenember)
Leap Year Day can be named as LEDAY((Date will be 30th Thirteenember)
This seems like an odd naming scheme. I think the Year Ending Day could simply be called Year Day. In the cases of leap years, there could be two Year Days, the first one being called First Year Day, the second Second Year Day.
By using this calender our measuring system becomes very simple.
I'm in total agreement.
Can anybody answer why are we not implementing this ?
The fact that we reckon all time by our current calendar may be a factor. It would be a pain to have to go back to every day in our past and assign a corresponding day from our new calendar. Then we'd hafta recall all history textbooks and print new ones which showed the new dates.
I wonder when ya propose Year One should be. This should be a religion-neutral calendar, so no doing this by Jesus's birthday. Perhaps we could put Year One at the time Sputnik 1 was launched, since that was the first manmade object to have reached outer space (to the best of my knowledge).
Can anybody tell me the name and address (phone/fax no/ email ) of the committee or panel who decides about the accptance of new calender system ?
There really is no such committee. It's not every day a new calendar system is proposed.
Gondolin,
I also have an idea. We can read time differently. I have created a series of dots, letters, numbers, exclamation points, and animals that will help us read time easier.
Example: 1:30pm would be ..sw42!23..goose...fj44:
Easy huh?
. . . What?!
vslayer,
actually 1.30pm would be 55.42dt, metric time wolud be pretty easy to implement really
Is there an existing system for metric time?
Avatar,
Well, since my position in timespace continum varies I can not use a time counting system based on full moons, etc, because at one place there may be no moon at all, or be some 15 of them, so 850 carbon-based life cycles ago I thought that I need to count my being in something that is always where I am, that is myself. Because I'm not always carbon based my prime time measuring unit is Avatar Time Unit (as told). An ATU is basically the time it takes for 1 RIGT (or Random Idea Generation Time) to occur in particulary my mind.
The only problem is that it is rather difficult for other entities to accept time measuring in ATU's, and they always annoy me and convert ATU's in moons, many summers, seconds, cesium decay times, etc.
. . . What?!
I think that when we will have colonies on other bodies in our star system we (as humanity) should count the time not in years, because that is too local, but in solar orbits. Let's say, one solar orbit around our galaxy is 100 000 units.
Ye'r talking about a Cosmic Year. It's one orbit around the Milky Way, which takes 250 million years long.
One 100,000<Sup>th</Sup> of a Cosmic Year — yer proposed "unit" — is about 2500 years long. That's longer than two millenia, a unit of time that we never reckon time with anyway. We should make a unit a smaller piece of the Cosmic Year to fix this problem.
So we can have a time counting method that is one for all of our solar system. And it can be used in other star systems too.
I don't see anything wrong with sticking to our Earth calendar. It is, after all, our home planet, and we should keep our ties to the planet, even when we're spread out hundreds of lightyears away from it.
jennyRater,
we should have -
10 long months of 36 days each (have a global vote on which 2 monthnames to drop).
It would make the most sense to drop either January and February, or July and August. January and February kuz . . . well . . . it just happens to work, and it's convenient. July and August kuz those months were additional months to begin with.
But really, any two months could be logically dropped, as long as neither of them are September, October, November, or December. The name of each month translates to "seventh month", "eighth month", "ninth month", and "tenth month", respectively. If we avoided dropping any of the last four months, their names would once again make sense.
5 special days not part of any month, 1 fitted in between evry 2 months. these would be public holidays - the 1st would come before january, and thatd be New Years day.
Sounds kool.
The 2nd special day could be Easter, so we wouldnt have to keep changing its date every year.
That's a decision for the Christian church.
Thhe 5th special day could be Halloween, and the other 2... we could invent names.
Christmas + Indepndence day would stay inside their months, of course. For leap years, just make the New year holiday 2 days long before starting January.
Okay.