You can make speed limit laws, licensing laws, and registration laws, that apply to cars people already own.
it's already addressed in the
comment I posted to Bells
it also specifically addresses your AR comment
we need to get some restrictions on rapid fire weapons with large magazines, including purchase and sale of them. And universal background checks.
1- and again: it's addressed by BATFE
2- any vague comment regarding restrictions on rapid fire weapons is irrational
3- "large" is subjective. Standard issue AR magazines come in 30 round, so as it's very common, and small considering the 100 round mag.
4- this has all already been addressed and ignored by you
Except no one can name the job.
nonsensical reply - it applies to any heavy pulling job that is currently being done by diesel
I didn't say it wasn't standard anywhere, I said it was high capacity and could be restricted by law.
and I repeatedly made the point that this is a subjective opinion
of course, technically speaking, anything can be restricted by law - but that doesn't mean it will remain so. see linked comment above
Nor is it inferior. But it is widely held - a majority of the population of the US agrees with me in these matters.
no
a wide majority of an opinion poll may reflect your opinion, but considering the linked data from Vociferous and existing data I already shared, it doesn't reflect the majority of the population
No - it's your idea that they be armed to spec without the training. They're militia, remember. My idea is that militia should be properly armed to be militia.
Ah, you're getting it all confused in your head
when called to act as a Military force, military training makes sense - but that isn't the usual
the rest is just augmentation and it depends entirely on your history
there is no weapons training usually
that isn't my idea
it's my idea that the civilian population should be able to arm themselves to the capacity no different than LEO's or militia, sans the controlled weapons as designated by BATFE
I even commented about this once or twice... like:
- the argument is the justification of magazine limitations. That boils down to the number of rounds per magazine. it perfectly follows that if you're already part of a potential militia force you should be able to meet the same requirements of existing forces. Law Enforcement isn't military, yet they typically use the same magazines.
So it's strictly about the ability to arm
if ya want to talk training, that is another argument entirely, and I personally advocate for training
it's free locally from the NRA - with
safety and
Law being the primary focus before shooting
Not a fact. Your opinion, and very poorly based in a visible and continual failure to read with comprehension.
well, I can leave you with your own words as well: "Look at how much of my posting - including this one - involves correcting you about my posts. inability to paraphrase without altering, changing vocabulary and meaning, etc."
I am quoting you directly - so that isn't paraphrasing
I am also making valid points backed by data which you're ignoring (fire rate, magazines, BATFE, "large", etc)
I have already linked refuting evidence to your opinion being widely held, which
Vociferous has also linked supporting data
I have made clear arguments that you then used "deductive" reasoning to completely cherry pick, make false claims about then attempt to use as "reasoned" and "informed" opinion per my "posts" (already linked that to you)
there is plenty more, but no need to continue
