outer "space" involves full inertia
Great, so not going anywhere
FULLY INVISIBLE
Cannot see it - totally transparent - see right through it
AND black ?
so the black is the background? ? ?
Tell more please
WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:
- Thread starter Frank DiMeglio
- Start date
outer "space" involves full inertia
Great, so not going anywhere
FULLY INVISIBLE
Cannot see it - totally transparent - see right through it
AND black ?
so the black is the background? ? ?
Tell more please
Frank DiMeglio
Registered Member
WHY AND HOW EINSTEIN'S "CURVED SPACE" IS ULTIMATELY ELIMINATED IN WHAT IS THE FULL AND PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF GRAVITY:
F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
SO, the SEMI-SPHERICAL, TRANSLUCENT, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE sky reduces to A POINT (on balance) in relation to THE EYE, THE EARTH, AND WHAT IS THE BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE IN/OF SPACE. Witness the stars AND PLANETS AS POINTS in the night sky. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. INDEED, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Perfect. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
SO, "mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, a given planet (including what is THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND WHAT IS PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. IT IS PROVEN !!! MAGNIFICENT !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Think about it. GREAT !!!!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY.
Dream experience is/involves true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. MOST IMPORTANTLY, in dreams, BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. Great !!! Therefore, it is AGAIN proven that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE EYE IS THE BODY. Importantly, dream experience is possible/potential AND ACTUAL IN BALANCE.
Moreover, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Thoughts ARE invisible. Magnificent. Once AGAIN, it is precisely PROVEN that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Overlay THE EYE in balanced relation to what is THE EARTH. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The DOME of a person's EYE is also visible. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is ESSENTIAL. (BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand.) Witness THE ORANGE SUN in RELATION to THE EYE AND THE EARTH/GROUND. GREAT. THE EYE is ALSO the body. Piece it ALL together. BEAUTIFUL. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It IS definitively AND CLEARLY PROVEN !!!
ACCORDINGLY, it is extensively, perfectly, theoretically, mathematically, CLEARLY, and consistently PROVEN that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, E=mc2 is fundamentally (AND DIRECTLY) derived from F=ma; AS F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great.
Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. THINK.
GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This ALSO explains stellar clustering, the supergiant stars, the cosmological redshift, AND the "black hole(s)". ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time dilation ALSO proves that GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. GREAT !!!!!! ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Really THINK about the extension of SPACE. FANTASTIC.
By Frank DiMeglio
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
How do those two formulae prove this?
Please show your work.
Hello Frank,
Did you know that on the internet using ALL CAPS can be considered rude - akin to SHOUTING?
You might find that you get a better response - and more people might read your posts - if you didn't give the impression that you are SHOUTING AT THEM! Something to consider. But let's move on.
Can you please explain how electromagnetism and gravity are linked?
Also, can you explain why you write "electromagnetism/energy", since those are two different things. Did you just mean "and" when you wrote "/" there?
What do you mean by "balanced". Balanced in what way?
If you're saying that electromagnetism is the same as gravity, that's disproven by experiment. So there's not much more to say on that topic.
I agree that the gravitational force mg is proportional to mass m, which has inertia.
That's a result of tidal locking, by the way.
....
There's more, but I'm going to stop here.
Let me say three things. One: you really need to explain this "balance" concept that seems to be important to your ideas. Two: you haven't actually "proven" anything here; you have merely made a number of assertions. Three: your idea that gravity is the same as electromagnetism is unsupported by you and unsustainable in the light of evidence.
Did you know that on the internet using ALL CAPS can be considered rude - akin to SHOUTING?
You might find that you get a better response - and more people might read your posts - if you didn't give the impression that you are SHOUTING AT THEM! Something to consider. But let's move on.
Okay. You're not posting the proof, I see, but let's run with this for the moment.
Can you please explain how electromagnetism and gravity are linked?
Also, can you explain why you write "electromagnetism/energy", since those are two different things. Did you just mean "and" when you wrote "/" there?
What do you mean by "balanced". Balanced in what way?
If you're saying that electromagnetism is the same as gravity, that's disproven by experiment. So there's not much more to say on that topic.
I can't tell what you mean by that. You'll need to unpack it for me.
The planets don't appear exactly as points - especially the nearer ones. They look more like discs.
Maybe you meant to say that Mass/energy causes gravity?
It can't be. The two things are observed to work differently.
What's the "reduction of space"? How can a speed "balance" that? (What do you mean by balance?)
Does "balanced" mean "proportional to", then?
I agree that the gravitational force mg is proportional to mass m, which has inertia.
Didn't you already make that claim?
What is "balanced inertia"? (What do you mean by balanced?)
I think you may have cut and pasted the same statement several times. A little effort in editing your posts would make them more readable.
Accordingly? You haven't made any clear link between your previous idea and Kepler's second law, as far as I can tell.
Well, in a vague sort of unhelpful way, maybe.
You didn't prove it.
That's a result of tidal locking, by the way.
We don't need to equate gravity and electromagnetism to establish that.
That's a big claim you're making, and a new topic for discussion. Do you plan to present any evidence for your view?
What do you mean by balance? That word is very prominent in your ideas.
On the face of it, that claim is obviously incorrect.
There's that word again.
....
There's more, but I'm going to stop here.
Let me say three things. One: you really need to explain this "balance" concept that seems to be important to your ideas. Two: you haven't actually "proven" anything here; you have merely made a number of assertions. Three: your idea that gravity is the same as electromagnetism is unsupported by you and unsustainable in the light of evidence.