Nothing. The light reflects anyway, as several people have pointed out.What do your eyes have to do with the reality of the mirror ?
But if you care WHAT YOU SEE, your eyes are pretty important, don't you think?
Nothing. The light reflects anyway, as several people have pointed out.What do your eyes have to do with the reality of the mirror ?
Our eyes are the pinnacle of observation , indeed they are very important .Nothing. The light reflects anyway, as several people have pointed out.
But if you care WHAT YOU SEE, your eyes are pretty important, don't you think?
This is all quite irrelevant. If you want to discuss these issues, they need a separate thread.Our eyes are the pinnacle of observation , indeed they are very important .
The Sun does not reflect light , it emits light ?
Why does the Sun look ''orange'' in colour when the light emitted is a mixture of frequencies?
The thread topic is about the inverse square law and reflections which are light based events . Light is the topic and rather than spamming the forum with individual threads on light , isn't it more suiting to keep to one thread when the subject material is light ?This is all quite irrelevant. If you want to discuss these issues, they need a separate thread.
Perhaps you might finish with one question before starting another.... and rather than spamming the forum with individual threads ...
No. The topic is the inverse square law and reflection, not any old crap you care to dream up about light.The thread topic is about the inverse square law and reflections which are light based events . Light is the topic and rather than spamming the forum with individual threads on light , isn't it more suiting to keep to one thread when the subject material is light ?
The question is very relevant in consideration of the photon electrical effect ! The reflection in a mirror has spectral content (colour) .
The Sun emits light rather than having incident rays strike the surface , unlike the mirrors image . How can the photon electrical effect apply to the sun , allowing us to observe visually an ''orange'' colour ?
I personally think we have something wrong in regards to how light works !
My first question was answered but was the answer satisfactory enough to satisfy my curiousness ?Perhaps you might finish with one question before starting another.
In fact, someone predicted you'd go off on a new tangent before your first questions were answered. They must be psychic.
I am not dreaming up anything , every thing I have mentioned are real points and asks !No. The topic is the inverse square law and reflection, not any old crap you care to dream up about light.
But this behaviour of yours is indeed what I predicted.
You might think that. I couldn't possibly comment.Getting some serious Theorist vibes...
It does both. But the amount it emits is far, far, far higher than the light it reflects.The Sun does not reflect light , it emits light ?
Because of Rayleigh scattering in the atmosphere. (That's also why the sky is blue.)Why does the Sun look ''orange'' in colour when the light emitted is a mixture of frequencies?
That is a completely different phenomenon.The question is very relevant in consideration of the photon electrical effect !
You can question whatever you like. All your questions have been answered. If you refuse to accept the answers, so be it. But that's on you.but I must still question the mechanics of reflected mirror images