Why do more White men have Chodes then those of Asian descent?

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

ChodeCannon113

Guest
My theory about White men being more likely to have a chode over asians is based on Arktul's theory of mascularity. This document was published by the New England Journal of Medicine in 1999. The article points that men from an aryan descendence have a differnt mutational gene called the "Chodomis". This gene is found in aryan men over those of japanese descendence. My question is why is this gene found in Africans as well, but not the asians? Surly the two groups must have come in contact for evolution to effect both groups. Discuss.
 
Well my belief is that the mutational gene "Chodomis" actually applies to survival of the fittest. The reason why it is present in Africans is because of the various hazardous vegetation growing in the area. Becoming snagged on say a bush would decrease their chance of reproduction. However the chode is "compact" and increases the chance of reproduction. Survival of the fittest. However asians have never benefited from the mutation.
 
You're argument based upon the origins of the Chodomis gene is false. This is primarily due to the fact that you mis understood the actual complixarimatricity of the Genes existence. This actual gene exists in every human being. It is a part of EVERY ONE. The difference is that the gene is much more active amongst the aryan race compared to the Asians. Their is no argument that Asians do not bear this gene. The gene lays dormant amongst that group. The vegetation argument also has been proven wrong on multiple levels. According to Theraptucix XVI edition, It has been proven that the Achlerity of the genes existence is clearly leximetive.
 
so ChodeCannon113 if u already know the answer to ur own question why bother asking us about it in first place?
 
Asian:
......
......
..................................................................
..................................................................
......
......


Aryan:

......
......
.................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
.................
......
......
 
I am merly pointing out that The explanation provided earlier was not true. It's still unknown to the scientific world why the gene remains dormant in that race? I'm looking for opinions. I do not know the answer. I am a Biologist from MIT University, And i've talked to several proffessors and decided to seek further information here.
 
Strange that two posters with such similar interest (if the usernames are any intimation) should appear together.

edit: 3 posters???
 
Well i'm saying it is MORE common for a member of the Aryan race to have a chode then an asian. Not saying Asians have bigger penis',..
 
There is no actual "answer" I've heard countless theories. And im always seeking more knowledge. Im open to other people's opinions.
 
Actually, the Theory of Conceptual Mannerism towards the Arktul's theory of mascularity is particularely argumentative and contradicts each of the foundations of "Chodomis" and its branches.

You could say the statement of the "Survival of the fittest" applies into this, however, in my expertise in the knowledge of chodes, the Asians never had hardships such as an Africans would. In 1999, as the theory came to, many biologists concluded there were some mistakes in that theory of article 2 section 5 of the International Biologists' Society, AKA IBS.

This states that there has been various mistakes among Arktul's Theory and must be corrected and in my professional opinion, chodes are amongst many Asians, however they are not as large as such an Africans would have. Now, this is only a theory of mine, but in the year 2050, there would be a HUGE increase in the chode population in Asia, as much as a 7% increase in chodes in Africa and 5% in Asia.

Please go on with the discussion.
 
First of all the main reason why the Aryan race shows the gene as dominant more than in say Asians is becasue of the high rate of homosexiality in the Aryan race. Because the penis is longer carrying out it's normal function amongst the Aryan's the Chode mutation becomes dominant and benefits their race.
 
Interesting anaylzsis Dr.Chode, I'm going to look into that article you mentioned. If my speculations are correct, I will have a more stable area to base my new hypothesis.
 
I concur with your statement ChodeCannon, Studies show that there arnt as many homosexuals in Asia as much as the Aryan races. This shows that Chodes are formed by homosexuality and because of the small entry of the rectum, it is widely spread out among the penis.
 
I'd also like the point out, During the Pre-histoic period, There has been fossiles that have revealed that a Tyrannosaurus Rexs are more probable to have chodes then the Spinosaur. This could relate to the location of where the gene is dormant/Active.
 
That's awkward to hear, however studies of the 1998 of the Biological Institute, the pterodactyl dinosaur have a higher chode population. This occured when they have been infected by the Tyrannosaurus Rexs' genes and the genetic mutation caused chodes and as well as many other problems and mutations on the sexual organs.
 
After studying many specimens with my colleagues at John Whales University I have discovered that the trait has only become dominant in human beings. However we discovered that it is dormant in the Killer Whale and the Duckbill Platypus. This may reenforce the hypothesis that it is only dominant in humans because of homosexuality. I have heard about that finding ChodeCannon113 from one of my Colleagues who studies Paleonotlogy. I happen to find this theory very probably seeing as how the male Tyrannosaurus Rex would not be protecting his young, which is the role of the mother. The male penis would not have been as important and therefore resulted in the decreased size, leading to the chode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top