Why Can't Matter Be Created Or Destroyed?

ISDAMan

ISDAMan

Thank You Jesus!
Registered Senior Member
Yes! At long last, I have returned yet again. Please, hold all insults until the end of the assumed conversation.

I have for some 30 years now been developing a theory regarding the structure of the universe and all reality. I would not dare to put myyself in the category of Einstein or even your local janitor. Simply, I have been thinking.

My theory explains the titular conundrum along with the method by which absolutely zero maybe achieved. It also explains the unbelievable, how to destroy matter and energy. It gives structure to why particles have stability and solves mysteries of the CMB cosmic background radiation readings we have detected. It explains the cosmic horizon, the lack of direct discovery of dark energy and the true mechanism for the expansion of the universe and why different measurement results occur. Lastly, black holes are greatly expounded upon with shocking, almost unfathomable, revelation.

First, however, and the importance of this will come to light, I covet your thoughts on whether or not factual episodic nothingness exists in the universe/reality and the function of said nothingness in relation to the somethingness of the universe/reality. I thank you in advance for your assumed participation. You won't be disappointed!!!
 
ISDAMan said:
Yes! At long last, I have returned yet again. Please, hold all insults until the end of the assumed conversation.

I have for some 30 years now been developing a theory regarding the structure of the universe and all reality. I would not dare to put myyself in the category of Einstein or even your local janitor. Simply, I have been thinking.

My theory explains the titular conundrum along with the method by which absolutely zero maybe achieved. It also explains the unbelievable, how to destroy matter and energy. It gives structure to why particles have stability and solves mysteries of the CMB cosmic background radiation readings we have detected. It explains the cosmic horizon, the lack of direct discovery of dark energy and the true mechanism for the expansion of the universe and why different measurement results occur. Lastly, black holes are greatly expounded upon with shocking, almost unfathomable, revelation.

First, however, and the importance of this will come to light, I covet your thoughts on whether or not factual episodic nothingness exists in the universe/reality and the function of said nothingness in relation to the somethingness of the universe/reality. I thank you in advance for your assumed participation. You won't be disappointed!!!
Click to expand...
A few comments:

- matter can be created from radiation and destroyed by converting it to radiation. Look up pair production and the annihilation of particles and antiparticles.

- If you have a theory, as opposed to just a conjecture or a wild-arsed guess, it needs to be testable. There has to be a way to show that observations of nature fit the theory. Have you given any thought to that?

- factual episodic nothingness is not a term with a self-evident meaning. You will need to provide a definition of this term before anyone can comment usefully.
 
ISDAMan said:
Yes! At long last, I have returned yet again. Please, hold all insults until the end of the assumed conversation.

I have for some 30 years now been developing a theory regarding the structure of the universe and all reality. I would not dare to put myyself in the category of Einstein or even your local janitor. Simply, I have been thinking.

My theory explains the titular conundrum along with the method by which absolutely zero maybe achieved. It also explains the unbelievable, how to destroy matter and energy. It gives structure to why particles have stability and solves mysteries of the CMB cosmic background radiation readings we have detected. It explains the cosmic horizon, the lack of direct discovery of dark energy and the true mechanism for the expansion of the universe and why different measurement results occur. Lastly, black holes are greatly expounded upon with shocking, almost unfathomable, revelation.

First, however, and the importance of this will come to light, I covet your thoughts on whether or not factual episodic nothingness exists in the universe/reality and the function of said nothingness in relation to the somethingness of the universe/reality. I thank you in advance for your assumed participation. You won't be disappointed!!!
Click to expand...
Do you have a back ground in Science? Physics?
 
ISDAMan said:
how to destroy matter and energy.
Click to expand...
Google fission, nuclear bomb, nuclear reactor.

ISDAMan said:
It gives structure to why particles have stability
Click to expand...
Google Standard model

ISDAMan said:
CMB cosmic background radiation
Click to expand...
The CMBR is from last scattering

ISDAMan said:
dark energy and the true mechanism for the expansion of the universe and why different measurement results occur. Lastly, black holes are greatly expounded upon with shocking, almost unfathomable, revelation.
Click to expand...

I doubt it to be honest. I am not sure this should be in hard science.
 
ISDAMan said:
I covet your thoughts on whether or not factual episodic nothingness exists in the universe/reality
Click to expand...

That depends on how you would define nothing.

It depends on how much your model diverge from current mainstream scientific model.

Is vacuum actually nothing for you?

If vacuum is space devoid of matter,
so space where you have only dark matter, is it still vacuum?

Is space-time fabric still something or nothing?

Your question about "factual episodic nothingness" is intriguing, but it hinges on how you define "nothing" within your theoretical framework.

In the mainstream scientific model, "nothing" is often associated with the vacuum of space, but even this isn't truly "nothing."

A vacuum may lack baryonic matter, but it still contains quantum fields, vacuum energy, and the spacetime fabric itself.

Dark matter and dark energy further complicate the picture—would a region with only dark matter or dark energy qualify as "nothing" in your model?

And is spacetime itself "something" or "nothing" in your view?

Could you clarify how you define "nothingness" and how it functions episodically in your theory?



In the mainstream scientific model, a vacuum is typically defined as a region of space devoid of baryonic matter (i.e., ordinary matter like atoms, molecules, and particles such as protons, neutrons, and electrons).

Dark matter, is generally considered a form of matter, albeit non-baryonic, meaning it does not consist of the same particles as ordinary matter.

Given this:
A region of space containing only dark matter would not be considered a perfect vacuum in the strictest sense, as dark matter is still a form of matter.

However, in practical terms, astrophysicists and cosmologists might still refer to such a region as a "vacuum" for simplicity if it lacks baryonic matter.

The vacuum in this context would still contain quantum fields, vacuum energy (related to the cosmological constant), and the spacetime fabric itself.


I will not give my personal definition of nothing as it would complicate things.

You are here, to discuss your personal model and how you define things, not mine.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top