However, to track the point: Malakas proposed that, "When little girls, or trolls, are allowed to post inanities but any rational position that does not adhere to modern western social dogma is banished then, that sir, is mediocrity." I invited a demonstration of that process. 2inquisitive asserted that the process was demonstrated in Gendanken's dismissal.
I was also banned three times because I posted 'offensive' material.
Nothing negative or hurtful about the human species is tolerated because, obviously, the universe is so positively inclined towards us.
It has become 'self-evident', in this intellectually diminishing western world, that anything that hurts us or confronts our comfortable 'truths' must be a product of evil or hatred.
This is how censorship ensues.
Yet, little girls spewing inanities about their favorite color or how their daddy only gives them $1000 a month for an allowance, and religiuos fanatics preaching stupidities based on nothing more than hearsay and childish reasoning are acceptable material because they do not insult a moderator's western delusions or threaten his bottom line or his ego.
In your desperate attempt to exclude certain viewpoints you've acquired a new religion. You cal it science.
You forget, perhaps, that science is a child of philosophy and free speculation based on reason and observation and that science, today, is dependent on big money and so accountable for their theories to entities with deep pockets and shallow minds.
Political-correctness is so insidious that it has now infected minds to the point where certain questions are considered embarrassing, and the scientist or thinker who dares posit them faces institutional ridicule and dire personal costs.
The methods of censorship abound and are easily perceived by all except the stupid and pseudo-intelelctual, like most of you moderators are.
Yuor quality is reflected in this forum's quality.
