Why black men have a bigger penis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Prince James said:
Um, you do know that no scientific report has ever surfaced that claims that black men have larger penises in proportion to height? That even when some studies have shown a minor advantage in that area, it has been in the realm of one or two centimetres? Even Orientals/East Asians, which are the common butt of small penis jokes, are said to only vary from the norm, at most, by one or two centimetres.

Unlike IQ and various other factors, penis size seems to not vary amongst the races significantly.
Click to expand...

I haven't really read the studies about penis length. But I think the differences of penis length between races are real, based on what I've seen from porn. Asians do indeed have very small penises. If you look at some of that that Bukkake stuff, it's really good, because there's like a room full of Japanese guys wanking on a poor girl. It's good, because you get a good sample. (If they're using the larger cocked Japanese because it's porn, then I feel REALLY bad for them.) But yeah, you can definitely tell their penises are smaller because you can tell their size by proportion to their bodies. If the penises are small looking in relation to their bodies, then they must REALLY be small, because we know Asians tend to have small bodies.

I mean, if you've ever watched porn, it's extremely evident that the differences are real. No studies necessary, even when you take into the account that the reproductive organs in porn tend to be exaggerated in size for the effect. Come on man! Don't you have a cable modem?!
 
You guy's are brain dead, I am the only one who offered tangible proof and you dis-regard my findings. I am not making this up, and i think it constitutes a good enough random sampling so screw you guys.

based on what I've seen from porn
Click to expand...

Did you ever think that the white guy's with the bid weenie;s arent out there displaying them?

AND another odd thing is that a particular profession I noted to be well off, meaning they gravitated to it based partly on this...which had led me to conclude there was a psychological element. If you think about you would be able to make an educated guess as to what profession i mean (not porno).

Spidergoat: You mentioned heat exchanger, nice try but havent you noticed this is the coldest appendage?

Damn this is the longest post i ever made :(

I can tell you more about women though, all race's but i dont want to brag...

I'm gonna make a thread dedicated to my initial post but i am way too tired right now, if anyone here reads my post's any way :mad:
 
Last edited:
francois said:
I haven't really read the studies about penis length. But I think the differences of penis length between races are real, based on what I've seen from porn. Asians do indeed have very small penises. If you look at some of that that Bukkake stuff, it's really good, because there's like a room full of Japanese guys wanking on a poor girl. It's good, because you get a good sample. (If they're using the larger cocked Japanese because it's porn, then I feel REALLY bad for them.) But yeah, you can definitely tell their penises are smaller because you can tell their size by proportion to their bodies. If the penises are small looking in relation to their bodies, then they must REALLY be small, because we know Asians tend to have small bodies.

I mean, if you've ever watched porn, it's extremely evident that the differences are real. No studies necessary, even when you take into the account that the reproductive organs in porn tend to be exaggerated in size for the effect. Come on man! Don't you have a cable modem?!
Click to expand...

Like I said in an earlier post in another thread, a 4 or 5 inch dick in China is considered enormous and probably admired and hoped for by a Japanese male in Japan. Anything bigger than that is considered a 'blessing'. :D
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Why black men have a bigger penis.


The men in Scandinavia have on average a smaller penis than people from Africa. We assume for the sake of argument that penis length is genetically determined although no scientific studies have identified the genetic regulators of penis length. Why would there be a size difference.

Scandinavian women do appreciate the longer penis. The theory that there has been sexual selection towards a smaller penis in Scandinavian countries therefore becomes implausible.

Evolution often works in strange ways. Here we propose a different theory on the size difference of the human penis.

The penis is a well vascularized organ. In this way it differs to a degree from other primate penises. The penis is not only well vascularized the blood flow to the penis can also be regulated. This can only mean one thing. The penis is a heat exchanger!

A comparable organ is the ear of the African elephant. It is well vascularized and has a large surface area. It is used to dissipate heat. The male penis is not only used for reproductive means, it is also a heat exchanger in the hot climate of Africa where humans emerged. A dual function of organs is not uncommon in the animal kingdom. The ears of the elephant are still used to hear.

When humans moved to Europe they finally ended up in cold Scandinavia. A large penis was evolutionary detrimental to survival. It dissipated too much heat. It shrank to reduce the surface area.

And that my friends is the truth and nothing but the truth so help me Darwin.
Click to expand...

You may be on to something, however, I was under the impression that the natural penis-maintenance features associated with exchange of heat were there to aid in the production of sperm. If I remember biology correctly, the testes need a finite temperature range that is slightly lower than the body's core temperature to both produce and store it.
 
It's kind of a bad theory. No offense spurious.

It's much more likely that the white man's (and the Asian man's) penis shrank as their brain masses increased, due to the increased selection for intelligence in their new environments.
 
francois said:
It's kind of a bad theory. No offense spurious.

It's much more likely that the white man's (and the Asian man's) penis shrank as their brain masses increased, due to the increased selection for intelligence in their new environments.
Click to expand...

What are you using to gauge intelligence?
 
I'm using IQ for measuring intelligence. If you wanna get a better context of what I am talking about, there's more on the the 2nd page of this thread.

The one thing spuriousmonkey and I do seem to agree on, however, is that penis size is affected by climate. Just more indirectly in my concept.
 
francois said:
I'm using IQ for measuring intelligence. If you wanna get a better context of what I am talking about, there's more on the the 2nd page of this thread.

The one thing spuriousmonkey and I do seem to agree on, however, is that penis size is affected by climate. Just more indirectly in my concept.
Click to expand...

What are you using to measure IQ?
 
IQ.... tests? I think that's how they derive IQ. Well, not always. I suppose it can be done by weighing the results of SATs for g.
 
francois said:
IQ.... tests? I think that's how they derive IQ. Well, not always. I suppose it can be done by weighing the results of SATs for g.
Click to expand...



Can you give more information about the IQ test information you/they are using? What about information on the SAT tests taken in Africa?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_IQ

The IQs for blacks in America are around 85.
In Subsahara Africa, it's under 70.
For Hispanics, it's around 90.
For whites, it's about 100.
For Asians, it's about 106.
For Ashkenazi Jews, it's about 115.

The three ones, about blacks, whites, and Asians, are the least controverisal--well, for those who study IQ, anyway.

One thing to learn is that many people find it preposterous or unlikely that there are differences in intelligences in different races. However, for people who study intelligence, it is a different story. In fact, in the field, these figures are highly uncontroversial and are highly established as they are derived from a century's worth of data. It is mainstream stuff. In the field, this stuff is simply known.
 
francois said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_IQ

The IQs for blacks in America are around 85.
In Subsahara Africa, it's under 70.
For Hispanics, it's around 90.
For whites, it's about 100.
For Asians, it's about 106.
For Ashkenazi Jews, it's about 115.

The three ones, about blacks, whites, and Asians, are the least controverisal--well, for those who study IQ, anyway.

One thing to learn is that many people find it preposterous or unlikely that there are differences in intelligences in different races. However, for people who study intelligence, it is a different story. In fact, in the field, these figures are highly uncontroversial and are highly established as they are derived from a century's worth of data. It is mainstream stuff. In the field, this stuff is simply known.
Click to expand...

Are these figures corrected for education and socio-economic status?
 
I could write something why nordic people have a higher IQ than people living in equatorial regions.

And it would make sense.

And it wouldn't make it true.
 
samcdkey said:
Are these figures corrected for education and socio-economic status?
Click to expand...

There is a definite tendency for people with low IQs to have low education and low socio-economic status. This should be a no-brainer. There is, in fact a positive correlation of .33 for IQ and parental socio-economic status. There is also a positive correlation of .55 for IQ and total years of education. A positive correlation of .86 for IQs of identical twins--which obviously suggest a powerful genetic influence.

There is in fact, a shit load of things that IQ correlates with, which suggest that a high IQ is often an indictor of fitness, at least in a civilized environment. The information is there in that wiki link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iq

But I don't want to argue about race and intelligence. This is stuff I already know. What do people think about my theory of race and penis size?
 
francois,

Do educational and socio-economic factors influence IQ or is the IQ that influence educational and socio-economic factors. In short, is the IQ figures caused by a genetic factor or by a widespread educational and socio-economic situation of those people?
 
spuriousmonkey said:
I could write something why nordic people have a higher IQ than people living in equatorial regions.

And it would make sense.

And it wouldn't make it true.
Click to expand...

Likewise, you could write something about why nordic people have smaller penises than people living in equatorial regions.

And it would make sense.

And it wouldn't be true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top