Why black men have a bigger penis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why black men have a bigger penis.


The men in Scandinavia have on average a smaller penis than people from Africa. We assume for the sake of argument that penis length is genetically determined although no scientific studies have identified the genetic regulators of penis length. Why would there be a size difference.

Scandinavian women do appreciate the longer penis. The theory that there has been sexual selection towards a smaller penis in Scandinavian countries therefore becomes implausible.

Evolution often works in strange ways. Here we propose a different theory on the size difference of the human penis.

The penis is a well vascularized organ. In this way it differs to a degree from other primate penises. The penis is not only well vascularized the blood flow to the penis can also be regulated. This can only mean one thing. The penis is a heat exchanger!

A comparable organ is the ear of the African elephant. It is well vascularized and has a large surface area. It is used to dissipate heat. The male penis is not only used for reproductive means, it is also a heat exchanger in the hot climate of Africa where humans emerged. A dual function of organs is not uncommon in the animal kingdom. The ears of the elephant are still used to hear.

When humans moved to Europe they finally ended up in cold Scandinavia. A large penis was evolutionary detrimental to survival. It dissipated too much heat. It shrank to reduce the surface area.

And that my friends is the truth and nothing but the truth so help me Darwin.


african people have a larger penis because african women usualy have a larger vagina.


its as simple as that.


peace.

That's an interesting fact. This of course does not diminish then the theory that the penis was enlarged in tropical regions for the purpose of having a more effective heat exchanger to cool down. Except that it was a secondary effect.

The female organ was enlarged to act as a heat exchanger. We all know that sometimes the female organ can produce wetness. Some people associate this with sexual excitement. What if however if this organ originally became wet for a differen reason?

Kangaroos lick their front legs to cool down. The saliva evaporates and this sheds body heat from the bloodvessels in the paw.

When humans first evolved they had not invented underwear yet. Hence it is reasonable to assume the human female walked around naked. We also know that females have on average more fat. Fat insulates and hence women will retain heat better than men. The need to heat loss therefore is proportionally greater in women compared to men. Both have sweat glands. Enlarged female genitalia combined with a wetness produced by specific glands hence created a primitive heat exchanger in hot climates that could mean the difference between life and death.

As a secondary consequence the male penis was enlarged to fit the female reproductive organ with more than one function.

In cold climates women rapidly lost their need for natural wetness. Their genitalia shrivelled and became dry. Hence in nordic countries such as finland women need to be lubricated with large amounts of alcohol before sexual success can be attained.
 
That's an interesting fact. This of course does not diminish then the theory that the penis was enlarged in tropical regions for the purpose of having a more effective heat exchanger to cool down.

Why do you discount gravity? In the tropical areas of Africa, one doesn't need clothing, so the penis hangs out free, more subject to gravity than if confined with heavy clothing required in colder climates.

However, your idea of the penis being a heat exchanger ...is the large penis also on all people who evolved in tropical areas? If so, then your theory might be ...ahh, somewhat acceptable as a theory.

Baron Max
 
Why do you discount gravity? In the tropical areas of Africa, one doesn't need clothing, so the penis hangs out free, more subject to gravity than if confined with heavy clothing required in colder climates.

However, your idea of the penis being a heat exchanger ...is the large penis also on all people who evolved in tropical areas? If so, then your theory might be ...ahh, somewhat acceptable as a theory.

Baron Max

Join me on my expedition next year to the equator to measure man. You hold cam hold the unwashed penises of the natives and I will measure.
 
Join me on my expedition next year to the equator to measure man. You hold cam hold the unwashed penises of the natives and I will measure.

Sorry, Spurious, but I can't take the heat and humidity of the tropics. But thanks for asking anyway.

Baron Max
 
Join me on my expedition next year to the equator to measure man. You hold cam hold the unwashed penises of the natives and I will measure.
Whose gonna stroke the specimens into tumescence?

Maybe using the mouth will better serve your purposes.
I believe Baron Max’s moustache will be effective, although sir Dork’s lithe, soft hands might be better.
 
At one point I did look up scientific references on the measurement of man's penis, because it is always nice to back up a wild (but absolutely true) hypothesis on human evolution.

I actually couldn't find a scientific publication stating that the penis of certain groups were bigger than others with the exception of asians. No article had trouble defining those as the chosen people who do not need to lose much heat.

The method sections were more revealing, or should I say concealing. Although they mentioned from which point to which point they measured the penis, they never touched the subject that the size of the human penis undergoes fluctuations. I am not refering to the state of full erection vs no erection, but to the observed fact (by this researcher) that the length of his penis varies greatly during the day depending on a complex set of factors.

Surely these relevant factors must be determined for each individual or an average size for the individual must be obtained which is used as a basic entry into the database before any meaningful statistics can be derived from a survey.

and concerning my hands. Moisterizer is the secret.
 
At one point I did look up scientific references on the measurement of man's penis, because it is always nice to back up a wild (but absolutely true) hypothesis on human evolution.

I actually couldn't find a scientific publication stating that the penis of certain groups were bigger than others with the exception of asians. No article had trouble defining those as the chosen people who do not need to lose much heat.

The method sections were more revealing, or should I say concealing. Although they mentioned from which point to which point they measured the penis, they never touched the subject that the size of the human penis undergoes fluctuations. I am not refering to the state of full erection vs no erection, but to the observed fact (by this researcher) that the length of his penis varies greatly during the day depending on a complex set of factors.

Surely these relevant factors must be determined for each individual or an average size for the individual must be obtained which is used as a basic entry into the database before any meaningful statistics can be derived from a survey.

and concerning my hands. Moisterizer is the secret.
Yeah, yeah cut the dork talk.
You need a “fluffer” for your …ahem…research.

So who’s up for the job?

I suggest measuring Baron Max’s anal cavity.
To the depth of 12” place dye markers, every 1", of varying colors.

The specimen penetrates the …measuring device….thusly coloring the penis in question.
Or by measuring Baron’s screams in decibels the size can be determined.
 
I don't have any hard science to offer, but I do have a couple of direct observations.

Whenever I go jogging during the winter, my penis becomes freezing cold/numb while the rest of my body is warm/hot. Assuming this hypothesis was correct, the exchange of temperature would have either made my body colder, or made my penis warmer. Instead I find my ears, nose, fingertips, and penis are totally numb while the rest of me is steaming hot and dripping with sweat.

When I go inside after the run, my penis is one of the last extremities to thaw out. Not only that, but the only heat that seems to warm it (other than hot water) is the air inside my house. I don't feel the cold circulating to any other region of my body, nor do I feel the heat from my body traveling through my penis. I can cup my hand over my groin, press it against my body - and it (very slowly) warms from my own body heat.

If there are aspects of my penis that are intended for the 'dual purpose' temp exchange in other parts of my body, then it does an extremely poor job of doing it.
 
Since, > 1 billion of Chinese have really small dicks, that's small dick is biologically advantageous. Latinos are displacing blacks too.
 
Since, > 1 billion of Chinese have really small dicks, that's small dick is biologically advantageous. Latinos are displacing blacks too.

Obviously evolution makes no moral judgements. it just exists. Smaller and larger are sides of the same coin. In some environment large is good, in others it is not.

And evolution is a historical process. What once was beneficial could be detrimental now.

If there are aspects of my penis that are intended for the 'dual purpose' temp exchange in other parts of my body, then it does an extremely poor job of doing it.

Maybe you are white?
 
Ok, then. I gave the matter some thought.

I don't have any hard science to offer, but I do have a couple of direct observations.

Whenever I go jogging during the winter, my penis becomes freezing cold/numb while the rest of my body is warm/hot. Assuming this hypothesis was correct, the exchange of temperature would have either made my body colder, or made my penis warmer. Instead I find my ears, nose, fingertips, and penis are totally numb while the rest of me is steaming hot and dripping with sweat.

Actually you are confirming my hypothesis. Heat exchangers are supposed to be cool. If you are hot and poor water on on side of your body and compare the temperatures of both sides you will notice that after evaporation the one half acting as a heat exchanger is cooler.

pfff...almost had me in a corner. ;)
 
Asia is quite hot too, but they have tiny cocks.

Thus heat exchanger theory blown to oblivion

Plus, I have not observed any greater cock lengths in African men than anywhere else.

There is huge variety in European males.

My personal studies of white males show a variation of 1 inch flaccid to 6 inches+ Flaccid.


NOTE:
there is an advantage to a smaller cock, it more easily touches the G spot than a huge cock which just stuffs you.

Further NOTE:
In the animal kingdom, penis length is dependant upon female cavity (I presume) so there is no reason to assume it is any different with humans. Women are differring sizes so we need differring sized cocks to accomodate them.
 
Last edited:
Further NOTE:
In the animal kingdom, penis length is dependant upon female cavity (I presume) so there is no reason to assume it is any different with humans. Women are differring sizes so we need differring sized cocks to accomodate them.

there are notable exceptions. ;)
avian%2042.5cm.JPG
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/s...=8a3af3b12c59780dei=5088partner=rssnytemc=rss

As I said cock size relates to 'cavity' size ;)


"
If a male bird had a long phallus, the female tended to have a more elaborate lower oviduct. And if the male had a small phallus, the female tended to have a simple oviduct. “The correlation was incredibly tight,” Dr. Brennan said. “When you dissected one of the birds, it was really easy to predict what the other sex was going to look like.”
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top