who's who?

This will sound like I'm just saying it now, but I actually suspected that to be the case, then I thought "no, that wouldn't make any sense".
It still doesn't. I think I'm right and the english language is wrong in this instance.
 
whose car is this is the right one
who's car is illformed grammaticlly and semanticlly

whose car is this and this car is whose?

LOL
 
whose car is this is the right one
who's car is illformed grammaticlly and semanticlly

whose car is this and this car is whose?

LOL :D
 
Lou:

I'm pretty sure it's "its".

I'm also pretty sure that when it has finished bathing in assmilk, it will no doubt give us another school lesson, it's very good at that.
 
Bells said:
No, she was correct with its. You only do the it's if there is an is after the it.
Click to expand...

I believe that she meant "it's," not "its," and I also believe that there's no other way her statement would make sense.

outlandish said:
No, she meant "its options" as in "outlandish's options"
just the wench's lumbering attempt at wit.
Click to expand...

Ah, uh.... all right. I don't see how that makes sense, but I've learned not to question Gendanken.

thefountainhed said:
Hey Rappacini, redoubtable, or whatever the fuck how many sock puppets you have, there is no surprise to see your rigid ass in this thread, but you are right: whose car is that?
Click to expand...

All right, gadfly! When I want to hear Cerberus yapping, I'll throw you a bone.

When I don't, I won't, and you can keep your three heads, Unrestraint, Obtrusion, and Stridence, all to yourself.
 
Last edited:
thefountainhed said:
who's = who is.
its = it in the possesive. i.e. its luggage-->the luggage it possesses.
it's = it is

who is car is that --> is bloody stupid.
Click to expand...

You spelled possessive wrong. :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top