Who was responsible for the 911 attacks?

Who was responsible for the 911 attacks?

  • Americans?

    Votes: 15 37.5%

  • Arabs?

    Votes: 25 62.5%
  • Total voters
    40
Whatp happened? The poll was doing so well with Arabs 6 and Americans 11.
Do people actualy believe it was the Arabs? Where is the proof?
 
I guess it is pretty simple.
America blows up the towers.
Naturally, they decide not to investigate.
They use Bin Laden as their patsy.
They control the media into suppressing the truth.
They use it as an excuse to go to war.
The family members spend tons of painstaking time and effort in DC to push congress to investigate.
They create the 911 commission full of corrupt officials.
Corrupt members of the commission withheld information to other members of the commission.
Certain corrupt members had to be forced out of the commission because of conflict of interest. Their interest of course was to supress and manipulate information.
A completely unsatisfactory sham of a report comes out. 911 Commission Report.
The document is clearly a sham to anybody past an elementary education.
Everything points to an inside job.

The votes on this board point to arabs. I have not seen one shred of support for this argument.
 
That is because the government got rid of the evidence as fast as they could, and have no reason to investigate themselves.
There is actually lots of hard objective evidence in the first post under "Evidence".

I have yet to see how any reason that could make anybody think that Osama and the Arabs did this.
 
I have yet to see any proof that it was the arabs. According to all the info, it was Americans. Yet how much legitimate info is there claiming that the Arabs did it? None.
 
They create the 911 commission full of corrupt officials.

Certain corrupt members had to be forced out of the commission because of conflict of interest. Their interest of course was to supress and manipulate information.
Click to expand...

What, you have a problem with Henry Kissinger? :D

I have yet to see any proof that it was the arabs. According to all the info, it was Americans. Yet how much legitimate info is there claiming that the Arabs did it? None.
Click to expand...

Be a bit more specific when you refer to Arabs. After all, it could have been Arabs that did hijack the planes, but were working for the U.S. and whatnot. ;)

- N
 
cool skill said:
I have yet to see any proof that it was the arabs. According to all the info, it was Americans. Yet how much legitimate info is there claiming that the Arabs did it? None.
Click to expand...
there is no 'proof' americans did it either.

but let's play this your way.
why would americans fly planes into wtc1 and 2 and the pentagon?
 
leopold99 said:
but let's play this your way.
Click to expand...
OK.
Again.
Why would Arabs fly the planes into the wtc?
Where is the proof?
Don't idiotically claim to play it my way, then ask a quesion that I have never been asking.
The poll shows that most people believe it is the Arabs.
Most of the resources show that Americans were behind it, and covering it up.
What would make anybody believe Arabs did it?
I have yet to see any answer.
 
Well you are mister "logical man." I think you would say that more proof for A over B doesn't make A true.

Sheesh.
 
Absane said:
Well you are mister "logical man." I think you would say that more proof for A over B doesn't make A true.

Sheesh.
Click to expand...
No kidding as long as there are CDEF, and so forth in the scenario. Even if there was only A and B, there is no such thing as more proof. If only one was the answer, than only one can be proven to be the correct answer.
 
Well I meant evidence, not proof. Sorry.

But your situation is like saying "there is no evidence for X, therefore Y."

Where do you get your evidence?
 
it was the terrorists i mean after all that we have seen the government do under bush frankly i doubt they could pull something like that off
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top