ayla_z said:Do you think "indians" should have DNA tests to prove a
direct line? Or prove they have at least one grandparent
who was 100%? What makes a person "Indian"?
vslayer said:what makes a person any nationality? the willingness to live by the rules of that group and defend those rules.
ayla_z said:BILLIONS are being given to the tribes from all taxpayers in America.
The BIA is passing out HUGE amounts of money to "Indian Tribes"
who have a majority of members who are 1/8 indian blood or less,
often much less.
There are Tribal Chairmen who are Blond and blue-eyed,
students the same.. given "Native American" scholarships.
Do you think "indians" should have DNA tests to prove a
direct line? Or prove they have at least one grandparent
who was 100%? What makes a person "Indian"?
if someone lives by the indian way, then they should be considered indian.
many Okies are "white Indians",they have a lot of Indian blood, they live 'white',ayla_z said:Do you think "indians" should have DNA tests to prove a
direct line? Or prove they have at least one grandparent
who was 100%? What makes a person "Indian"?
:-confused-:
WildBlueYonder said:when I was in school, I met so many 'whites' that said they were part Cherokee, you'd think it was like claiming descent from the "Mayflower"
ayla_z said:Do you think "indians" should have DNA tests to prove a
direct line? Or prove they have at least one grandparent
who was 100%? What makes a person "Indian"?
ayla_z said:YEs, I realize that, at that is the very source of my inquiry.
American taxpayers are paying BILLIONS for "Indian Programs"
Yet many of these "Indians" have less Native "blood" than the
taxpayers who are supporting them. Some tribes require ZERO
"indian blood quantum" to be tribal members.
ayla_z said:Most aid to INDIVIDUAL INDIANS from the federal government
require 1/4 ..BUT... aid to TRIBES is where most of the money goes,
and so it goes to many who have so little
native "blood" it is almost non-existent.
ayla_z said:So, my original question is... DO you think the taxpayers of
America would be better served if the money we give for Native
Americans went exclusively to people who could prove a substantial
degree of "Indianess" rather than just to "Tribal Members".
Many tribal members in America have never set foot on a Rez,
and many on the Rez have very little cultural Knowledge,
so the idea of being a member of a Culture is not appropriate here.
If it was, then would we need to make laws requiring recognition
of anyone who lives according to Native Traditional Ways to be
declared Indian?
ayla_z said:You have some strong ideas, but you are not
answering the main question here. Do you think
$$ for Indians should go to people who clearly are Not? BILLIONS.
ayla_z said:Just thought I'd mention that the rights are not GRANTED, they are RESERVED.
Indians are just glorified Mexicans.ayla_z said:Do you think "indians" should have DNA tests to prove a
direct line? Or prove they have at least one grandparent
who was 100%? What makes a person "Indian"?
are you trying to slam 2 peoples with one insult? funny guyJ.B said:Indians are just glorified Mexicans.