Whence comes logic

Disagree

Inotherwords , reasoning gathers in knowledge , logic does not .
Observation note-taking and memory gather in data, which become knowledge only after reasoning has processed them and logic has organized them into a retrievable pattern.
 
Observation note-taking and memory gather in data, which become knowledge only after reasoning has processed them and logic has organized them into a retrievable pattern.

Agreed

But knowledge changes all the time , hence reason does and logic does .
 
Since the 50's, machines, theorem provers, produce formal proofs for theorems, something mathematicians almost never do. So, perhaps, not exactly "mere frills".
Admirable in some ways, but not necessary. All frills, compared to figuring out how to open a walnut.
 
But knowledge changes all the time , hence reason does and logic does .
No. Whatever size and shape garment you sew, the needle and scissors don't change. New variants on the scissors and needle may be invented for the sewing-on of distinct specialized frills, but the principles of cutting and sewing don't change.
 
river said:
But knowledge changes all the time , hence reason does and logic does .


No. Whatever size and shape garment you sew, the needle and scissors don't change. New variants on the scissors and needle may be invented for the sewing-on of distinct specialized frills, but the principles of cutting and sewing don't change.

What has this got to with the OP ?
 
The metaphor is irrelevant
You of all people are not really in a good position to just start labeling people's contributions as irrelevant. That'll backfire pretty badly.

Ah ...so knowledge , reason and logic is static then .
Did you just ... respond to yourself? Did you just say something from one side of your brain that the other side of your brain found enlightening?

How many of you are there in there?
 
You of all people are not really in a good position to just start labeling people's contributions as irrelevant. That'll backfire pretty badly.

So be it , I stand by my thinking .


Did you just ... respond to yourself? Did you just say something from one side of your brain that the other side of your brain found enlightening?

How many of you are there in there?

My understanding of things grows

My attitude towards understanding of this Universe grows , hence my knowledge , reason and logic grows .
 
What has this got to with the OP ?
It was a response to your claim that the if knowledge changes, reason and logic change.
No. They are the tools with which we process data. Sensory input enters the brain, is routed to the appropriate area, where it becomes information. Reason then classifies that information and compares it with previously stored information; logic, which is systematic reasoning, tests and evaluates the new information. If it's useful and fits into a pattern, it's stored in long-term memory as knowledge.
The analogy is to a piece of fabric coming into a tailor's workshop, being checked for flaws, evaluated for what kind of garment it will make, cut, fitted and sewn.
The tailor doesn't need a new kind of implement for each garment he produces, but he does sometimes need to modify his standard tools for a new kind of fabric.
 
Plus, I thought it was relevant as an extension of my previous comment on logical formulas, metaphors and frills.
I don't suppose river would know about that.
 
river said:
What has this got to with the OP ?


It was a response to your claim that the if knowledge changes, reason and logic change.
No.

They are the tools with which we process data. Sensory input enters the brain, is routed to the appropriate area, where it becomes information. Reason then classifies that information and compares it with previously stored information; logic, which is systematic reasoning, tests and evaluates the new information. If it's useful and fits into a pattern, it's stored in long-term memory as knowledge.
The analogy is to a piece of fabric coming into a tailor's workshop, being checked for flaws, evaluated for what kind of garment it will make, cut, fitted and sewn.
The tailor doesn't need a new kind of implement for each garment he produces, but he does sometimes need to modify his standard tools for a new kind of fabric.

And all change

Regardless of sensory input , put to the Brain . Knowledge evolves and so does the sensory input to the Brain .

The periodic table , is based on logic
 
Knowledge evolves and so does the sensory input to the Brain .
You mean, heat feels different on the skin of someone who knows the periodic table than on that someone who doesn't? I didn't notice a difference.
 
This may be of interest.
A perfectly patternless piano sonata. It's named "the beautiful math behind the world's ugliest music ever written", because it is written as a truly patternless tonal and rhythmical progression. It was composed by a mathematician and has no repeating themes of any kind (completely patternless), which normally provide emotional relief and satisfaction. It's really strange...it has no logical value at all!

https://www.ted.com/talks/scott_rickard_the_beautiful_math_behind_the_ugliest_music#t-663927

and in this "watch me play the audience":
In this fun, 3-min performance from the World Science Festival, musician Bobby McFerrin uses the pentatonic scale to reveal one surprising result of the way our brains are wired.
Watch logic in action and everyone gets it.
https://www.ted.com/talks/bobby_mcferrin_hacks_your_brain_with_music
 
Last edited:
Since the 50's, machines, theorem provers, produce formal proofs for theorems, something mathematicians almost never do
Well, all the former use applied mathematics to present their proofs by means of mathematical language, no?

Higgs boson comes to mind.
 
Back
Top