Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
If you can't remember your previous lives anyway? So it's like we live all these lives learning all these great lessons, but have the slate wiped cleaned each time we reincarnate? What's the point?
If you can't remember your previous lives anyway? So it's like we live all these lives learning all these great lessons, but have the slate wiped cleaned each time we reincarnate? What's the point?
Precisely how, where and when the idea of reincarnation originated is one of the great unsolved problems in the history of ideas. It's such an obvious idea that it probably appeared independently many times in many places. Its first appearance might have been very early, in the stone age.
My impression is that the Indian version of the idea, still prevalent in Hinduism, Buddhism and among the Jains, is basically an ethical belief. I'm less familiar with Greek variants on the idea, such as those once popular among the Orphics and Pythagoreans.
The ethical idea that underlies reincarnation is that everyone eventually gets what they deserve. (The idea of divine judgement plays a similar functional role in the Semitic religions.)
In real life, flourishing sinners and suffering saints create problems for the idea that the universe is a fair place, and for the idea that there's some pragmatic value for individuals in being good and doing the right thing.
So the idea arises that undeserved suffering in this life is the result of transgressions committed before birth. And good behavior that receives no recognition or reward in this life will have its beneficial effects after death, in the next life, in the form of a higher and more auspicious rebirth.
(The idea of post-mortem divine judgement addresses the second issue, but not the first. It has no answer for things like birth-defects.)
Of course, the same considerations would seem to apply in the next life. Good and bad post-mortem behavior still needs to have some link to rewards and punishments. So in the Indian scheme, it's not only possible to go to heaven, it's also possible to subsequently fall out of heaven, into earthly life or even into a hell. Conversely, it's possible for saintly hell-beings to rise up out of hell.
(The idea that people can't fall out of heaven once they are there implies that they can be as shitty as they want to be forever more, with no consequences.)
So you get this idea of an endless succession of lives, with countless beings constantly moving up and down through a whole hierarchy of states, from the lowest hells to the highest heavens, according to the moral quality of their behavior.
And that leads to the idea that ultimate salvation isn't about being reborn in a heaven at all. It's about achieving some final blessed state where the endless transmigration from life to life ceases and where whatever the goal is, is finally won. The Buddhists imagine it as nirvana, the Jains as omniscience, the Hindus as a final relationship or even union with the divine.
To be alive.
Thanks for that explanation. I still have a problem though with holding people morally accountable for things they did in another life in different circumstances as a different person. Say I was an ax murderer in a previous life. So in this life I get my legs cut off in a car crash. Seems like too little too late to me. I may be a total saint in this life, but then the punishment for being an ax murderer happens nonetheless. The person I am now is an entirely new and free moral agent. But I'M accountable too for the actions of this other person I was previously? The imbalance of getting off scot free as an ax murderer is only "resolved" by the imbalance of getting my legs amputated in this life. Thus an endless chain of imbalances is perpetrated thruout the karmic cycles.
If you can't remember your previous lives anyway? So it's like we live all these lives learning all these great lessons, but have the slate wiped cleaned each time we reincarnate? What's the point?
How about first learning about the actual different doctrines of karma and reincarnation/rebirth?
Precisely how, where and when the idea of reincarnation originated is one of the great unsolved problems in the history of ideas. It's such an obvious idea that it probably appeared independently many times in many places. Its first appearance might have been very early, in the stone age.
My impression is that the Indian version of the idea, still prevalent in Hinduism, Buddhism and among the Jains, is basically an ethical belief. I'm less familiar with Greek variants on the idea, such as those once popular among the Orphics and Pythagoreans.
The ethical idea that underlies reincarnation is that everyone eventually gets what they deserve. (The idea of divine judgement plays a similar functional role in the Semitic religions.)
In real life, flourishing sinners and suffering saints create problems for the idea that the universe is a fair place, and for the idea that there's some pragmatic value for individuals in being good and doing the right thing.
So the idea arises that undeserved suffering in this life is the result of transgressions committed before birth. And good behavior that receives no recognition or reward in this life will have its beneficial effects after death, in the next life, in the form of a higher and more auspicious rebirth.
(The idea of post-mortem divine judgement addresses the second issue, but not the first. It has no answer for things like birth-defects.)
Of course, the same considerations would seem to apply in the next life. Good and bad post-mortem behavior still needs to have some link to rewards and punishments. So in the Indian scheme, it's not only possible to go to heaven, it's also possible to subsequently fall out of heaven, into earthly life or even into a hell. Conversely, it's possible for saintly hell-beings to rise up out of hell.
(The idea that people can't fall out of heaven once they are there implies that they can be as shitty as they want to be forever more, with no consequences.)
So you get this idea of an endless succession of lives, with countless beings constantly moving up and down through a whole hierarchy of states, from the lowest hells to the highest heavens, according to the moral quality of their behavior.
And that leads to the idea that ultimate salvation isn't about being reborn in a heaven at all. It's about achieving some final blessed state where the endless transmigration from life to life ceases and where whatever the goal is, is finally won. The Buddhists imagine it as nirvana, the Jains as omniscience, the Hindus as a final relationship or even union with the divine.
If you can't remember your previous lives anyway? So it's like we live all these lives learning all these great lessons, but have the slate wiped cleaned each time we reincarnate? What's the point?
If you can't remember your previous lives anyway? So it's like we live all these lives learning all these great lessons, but have the slate wiped cleaned each time we reincarnate? What's the point?
If you can't remember your previous lives anyway? So it's like we live all these lives learning all these great lessons, but have the slate wiped cleaned each time we reincarnate? What's the point?
. The genetic buck stops there with the hope of transcending.
The point of reincarnation is to pass on past knowledge
But if you haven't been a good person, you'll be reincarnated as a dung beetle. An insect brain can't possibly hold all the knowledge your human brain contained.The point of reincarnation is to pass on past knowledge
But if you haven't been a good person, you'll be reincarnated as a dung beetle. An insect brain can't possibly hold all the knowledge your human brain contained.
Many dung beetles, known as rollers, roll dung into round balls, which are used as a food source or brooding chambers. Other dung beetles, known as tunnelers, bury the dung wherever they find it. A third group, the dwellers, neither roll nor burrow: they simply live in manure. They are often attracted by the dung burrowing owls collect.