What went wrong

Quantum Quack said:
difference is I don't try to rape people of their self-esteem...where as you do....or have been doing
Click to expand...

You're going off-topic, but I don't "rape" anyone of anything (poor choice of words here, by the way). If you say something silly, I point it out. You do the same thing, and most posters here do the same thing. I believe James R called you a nut or a loon earlier today. Where is your complaint about him?

This is what makes your complaints so funny: you and Reiku and others who complain that posters are being "bullies" and things of that nature are often the first to say something rude or out of line to a poster you disagree with. What about your insinuations about Aqueous Id's intellect made during your evolution debate? Or Reiku calling me "thick?" You guys have no problem whatsoever calling other posters names or insulting their intelligence, but when someone stands up to your rudeness or--heaven forbid--calls you out on a ridiculously absurd comment made in a discussion, you get all indignant.
 
As I said it is not about me it is about sciforums and it's membership [goodwill]
It doesn't matter if I can or can't prove a roll back cover up. That is for the membership to find out and decide... not me...
The email notifications the threads in question all speak volumes if one chooses to go look. If the members are apathetic then that also says volumes about sciforums future.
 
Quantum Quack said:
As I said it is not about me it is about sciforums and it's membership [goodwill]
It doesn't matter if I can or can't prove a roll back cover up. That is for the membership to find out and decide... not me...
Click to expand...

You sure seemed to believe otherwise a few hours ago. Now that your nonsense has been refuted, you'll pretend that you've backed off by choice, all the while offering up these clumsy insinuations.

The email notifications the threads in question all speak volumes if one chooses to go look. If the members are apathetic then that also says volumes about sciforums future.
Click to expand...

You still haven't explained how the email notifications are of any relevance. Please do.
 
Balerion said:
You sure seemed to believe otherwise a few hours ago. Now that your nonsense has been refuted, you'll pretend that you've backed off by choice, all the while offering up these clumsy insinuations.



You still haven't explained how the email notifications are of any relevance. Please do.
Click to expand...

maybe someone else can do that for you...I really need to go suck on my little pink and white capsules...
any ways you will find out soon enough...try googling it

any ways you are not the only one who can play internet forum "hop scotch"....
you know... one a penny , two a penny , three a penny, four! [ probably too young to remember yes?]
 
Quantum Quack said:
maybe someone else can do that for you...I really need to go suck on my little pink and white capsules...
any ways you will find out soon enough...try googling it
Click to expand...

Stop evading, QQ. You've ducked this question for hours now. Just tell me why the email notifications are of any significance.
 
So it was a conspiracy or not?
scratch-head01-idea-animated-animation-smiley-emoticon-000414-large.gif
 
Quantum Quack said:
try:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Electronic_Transactions_Act
or on a long shot:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Signatures_in_Global_and_National_Commerce_Act
Click to expand...

I'm not slogging through that nonsense when you are perfectly capable of telling me why you're so hung up on email notifications. Your evasion here suggest s that you're not at all confident in your position. You act as if you're surprised that the notifications for those messages are still in your email inbox, which leads me to believe that you expect the forum to be able to magically reach into your inbox and remove the notifications if those posts are deleted. How am I doing so far?
 
Emil said:
So it was a conspiracy or not?
scratch-head01-idea-animated-animation-smiley-emoticon-000414-large.gif
Click to expand...

No.

But we apparently have an employment contract according to Quack.....

Of which I and no one else who volunteers their time moderating here have ever seen..

This is because this forum and the "staff" and the rest of the members have come here with the specific intent to get Quack.;) It is all a ruse. Just to get Quack...

We even have a secret training base in Siberia. I can tell you now, the strip naked and run down the street covered in tar and feathers was a tricky test. You have no idea how many failed that one. Would help if they allowed us to take that test in summer. But nooooooo.. they make us take it in the dead of winter to make sure we are strong enough for the task.

But I have said too much..

*Squints at Quack*

/Sing song voice..

"We're coming to get youuuuuuuuuuuuuu.."

/Cackle
 
Bells said:
No.

But we apparently have an employment contract according to Quack.....

Of which I and no one else who volunteers their time moderating here have ever seen..

This is because this forum and the "staff" and the rest of the members have come here with the specific intent to get Quack.;) It is all a ruse. Just to get Quack...

We even have a secret training base in Siberia. I can tell you now, the strip naked and run down the street covered in tar and feathers was a tricky test. You have no idea how many failed that one. Would help if they allowed us to take that test in summer. But nooooooo.. they make us take it in the dead of winter to make sure we are strong enough for the task.

But I have said too much..

*Squints at Quack*

/Sing song voice..

"We're coming to get youuuuuuuuuuuuuu.."

/Cackle
Click to expand...

And remember, I'm your boss.

Now get me a coffee.
 
Yes. I´ve been trying to get Quack to pay off on his long ago made offer to any one could show photons exist between the source and their absorption point. I did in several different ways. For example by putting an interferometer between those two point and showing it changes the pattern on the screen so something was passing thru it between source and final absorption point (the screen). Inserting a polarizer in the path works too. Hell just inserting a mirror in the path can change where on the screen the photon is absorbed so photon must have been passing between source and adsorption point to "bounce" off the mirror, which can be placed anywhere along the path. etc.

There are lots of ways to prove something is passing thru the space between source and adsorption point despite Quack´s strange claim that nothing is.
In this case, "what went wrong" is Quack "welshed" on his bet.
 
why you're so hung up on email notifications.
Click to expand...

For those who are subscribed to threads with the option selected to receive instant email notification, they have a record of the original post, date and time, even if the poster later decides to edit or entirely delete their post.

On another forum, there are a couple of jokers and even a mod who enjoy using this flaunt/deny tactic in posting. The snipping tool is another means of capturing anything unusual on screen that one might like to investigate later. I have used this means to capture messages from my anti-virus when a forum experiences attack, sent those messages in to the staff as an aid in identifying the problem.

This thread is tedious, save for that guy who keeps defending my lettuce, lol... The horses stood guard last night. The lettuce be saved! :D

One-Lettuce-fills-a-large-b.jpg
 
scheherazade said:
For those who are subscribed to threads with the option selected to receive instant email notification, they have a record of the original post, date and time, even if the poster later decides to edit or entirely delete their post.

On another forum, there are a couple of jokers and even a mod who enjoy using this flaunt/deny tactic in posting. The snipping tool is another means of capturing anything unusual on screen that one might like to investigate later. I have used this means to capture messages from my anti-virus when a forum experiences attack, sent those messages in to the staff as an aid in identifying the problem.
Click to expand...

Maybe I'm overtired, but I still don't see what that has to do with Q's conspiracy theory.

This thread is tedious,
Click to expand...

You sure like posting in threads you find boring.
 
Originally posted by Balerion.

You sure like posting in threads you find boring.
Click to expand...


If you were paying attention, I was chatting up Mac.

You seem to have quite enough 'playmates.' :rolleyes:
 
Billy T said:
Yes. I´ve been trying to get Quack to pay off on his long ago made offer to any one could show photons exist between the source and their absorption point. I did in several different ways. For example by putting an interferometer between those two point and showing it changes the pattern on the screen so something was passing thru it between source and final absorption point (the screen). Inserting a polarizer in the path works too. Hell just inserting a mirror in the path can change where on the screen the photon is absorbed so photon must have been passing between source and adsorption point to "bounce" off the mirror, which can be placed anywhere along the path. etc.

There are lots of ways to prove something is passing thru the space between source and adsorption point despite Quack´s strange claim that nothing is.
In this case, "what went wrong" is Quack "welshed" on his bet.
Click to expand...
yep and you still haven't shown a photon exists other than by it's effect... so whose the goose?
Bet still there and I can almost guarrantee it will be there for ever...
there is no photon....sheesh!:D $500 usd
also I suppose you think that mathematics can function with a relative zero too? $200 usd $300 usd if proved correct and submitted for peer review.


ohh no... the great photon conspiracy! You know the thing you can't make you minds up about....
joomla_logo_black.jpg

and a big problem for science that just wont go away!
 
Last edited:
scheherazade said:
For those who are subscribed to threads with the option selected to receive instant email notification, they have a record of the original post, date and time, even if the poster later decides to edit or entirely delete their post.

On another forum, there are a couple of jokers and even a mod who enjoy using this flaunt/deny tactic in posting. The snipping tool is another means of capturing anything unusual on screen that one might like to investigate later. I have used this means to capture messages from my anti-virus when a forum experiences attack, sent those messages in to the staff as an aid in identifying the problem.

This thread is tedious, save for that guy who keeps defending my lettuce, lol... The horses stood guard last night. The lettuce be saved! :D

One-Lettuce-fills-a-large-b.jpg
Click to expand...
yes email notifications can be most useful... so too do print screens...
I still want to know how Balerion can post with impunity...from the rules
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top