That's what I think. But some people seem to think it does mathematics.Why should the universe describe anything? All it needs do is function in a fundamental way.
That's what I think. But some people seem to think it does mathematics.Why should the universe describe anything? All it needs do is function in a fundamental way.
Note that the quantum wave collapse (Bing) is audible on the recording of microtubule activity!
I think it all began when I mentioned Tegmark.....Wegs, you've created a monster...
Write4U said:
Why should the universe describe anything? All it needs do is function in a fundamental way.
That fundamental way is mathematical in essence. which is a logical conclusion based on the evidence.That's what I think. But some people seem to think it does mathematics.
In Eukaryotic organisms it is the network which is the basis for true intelligence in biological organisms. Microtubules are nano scale computers, trillions of them. That's how bacteria can perform "quorum sensing". A chemical mathematical counting ability, before becoming virulent. Fits right in with a fundamental mathematical universe.Tegmark, quasi-intelligence, mathematical universe - and you even managed to squeeze in microtubules!
I did in an earlier post, did you miss it? Except it isn't "quorum sending", it is "quorum sensing".If you'd managed to stuff 'quorum-sending' in there, I'd have a complete BINGO card and win the prize.
Of course everything relates to this . Tegmark believes his hypothesis is the beginning of a TOE.I just can't wait to see what shiny thing next catches your attention and becomes you next Only Answer To Life the Universe and Everything This Is It Guys Really This Time.
Maybe start a thread with Jan called "Can an atheist know God".I think it all began when I mentioned Tegmark.....
I should change the thread title to ''what is it about Tegmark that upsets you?''
Maybe start a thread with Jan called "Can an atheist know God".
How about "what is it about mainstream science that upsets you"?
Anybody has a any complaints about mainstream? Schrodinger's cat?
YESAnybody has a any complaints about mainstream? Schrodinger's cat?
It was a typo. Of course I've read it, how could anyone miss it?I did in an earlier post, did you miss it? Except it isn't "quorum sending", it is "quorum sensing".
How can you judge the logic of a proposition if you don't read accurately what is being proposed?
Bacteria practising mathematics. Pretty cool huh? Of course they've had 3.5 billion years to learn how to use it.It was a typo. Of course I've read it, how could anyone miss it?
In that sense of actually learning...Bacteria practising mathematics. Pretty cool huh? Of course they've had 3.5 billion years to learn how to use it.
I always understood Schrodinger's cat to be a case of reductio absurdumHow about "what is it about mainstream science that upsets you"?
Anybody has a any complaints about mainstream? Schrodinger's cat?
lolThis is mad.
Indeed.I always understood Schrodinger's cat to be a case of reductio absurdum
My understanding is that their behaviors can be described in mathematical terms, but bacteria can't ''practice'' math. No 's' in practice!Bacteria practising mathematics. Pretty cool huh? Of course they've had 3.5 billion years to learn how to use it.
My understanding is that their behaviors can be described in mathematical terms, but bacteria can't ''practice'' math. No 's' in practice!