I question a lot of.. Well.. Everything, that people say about the disorder..
most, if not all of them, also cause an excessive amount of weight gain which of course adds its measure to depression.. . . and anti-psychotics can cause depression.
I'm not sure, the term is almost as loosely thrown around as when people claim they are depressed, or addicted, or having a panic attack --when in fact a lot of those people are just sad, have low self control or are just really stressed. So if I had some serious thoughts about it, I'd seek an actual professional diagnosis. It's never a good idea to self-diagnose yourself, especially for serious disorders.
I found one "online support group" that was free, and so far, they are no help what so ever.. lol... I just wanna see others views on it.. And how different a bipolar person thinks/feels/acts to a normal person..
I disagree that bipolarism isn't caused by a chemical imbalance. My mother has had serious type I bipolarism since she was in her 30's and went thru many medications that seemed only to work for a short time. A few years ago she was prescribed Depakote, a seizure medication of all things, and has not had a manic episode in at least 2 and a half years. She's also on Zyprexa too so that may help as well. In any case, she is definitely much better for this combination of meds which wouldn't be working if bipolarism WEREN'T based on a chemical inbalance. And no it's not just masking symptoms. It's actually keeping her from spiralling into mania and psychosis, which is the best we expect from a medication in the first place.
There is no empirical evidence of chemical imbalance, and it is masking the symptoms if those symptoms are not apparent. Does she feel 100% better, or just kind of "like a shell of a person"? "The best we can expect" would seem to indicate that it does not address the causes. Painkillers can remove all the symptoms of pain, without ever addressing the causes.
But whatever you need to believe to justify either the efficaciousness of the placebo effect or the cost of the pharmaceuticals (which was the whole intent to the ad campaign).
I'm sure there's huge incentive for drug companies to spin their new meds in a favorable light. Perhaps kickbacks to medical institutions for pushing their meds over others. But as with most conspiracy theories it is just too simplistic to say this all there is to it. Over the years new meds have evolved that have less serious side effects. There is iow another incentive for pharmaceutical corporations to come up with BETTER more effective meds. And that means less side effects. My mother is definitely better taking her meds than not taking them. I speak only from experience and not from some ulterior agenda of supporting some sinister pharmaceutucal cartel. BTW, how many bipolar people do you personally know? Have you ever seen them in a full blown manic state?
What is your imagination like? I see myself sealed in Heaven as a peaceful king, and beauty to my taste all about. Versus, what is your reality? I was terribly abused as a child. I imagined one thing, and lived the entire opposite. In the imaginative state, I walk around with a big smile on my face. Then all of a sudden my family is all around me, and I turn sad.
The best advice I have for myself is remove those who oppose my imagination from my every day life. The reason I have mood swings is my grand imagination, and the life I perceive as reality are conflicted.
Now, what is the truth? Lady Imagination, or my childhood? What came first. Was I someones son, or had I already imagined? Some say I created my imagination to cope with reality, but reality is, my imagination was there before my first breath. I imagine happiness, but I was treated as dirt.
Evidence of brain chemistry differences in bipolar patients:
http://bipolar.about.com/cs/menu_science/a/press_umich0210.htm
Quite aside from the fact that this study is terribly small, with only 16 patients, they do not even know what chemicals are involved:
Specifically, more study is needed to examine which kinds of monoamine cells are involved
And it even confirms that the meds merely mask the symptoms:
It compared brain scans and neuropsychological test results from bipolar disorder I patients who were using medications to control their symptoms
Of course there is also:
Contrary to the assumptions of the monoamine hypothesis, lowered but not heightened activity of MAO-A was associated with the depressive symptoms in youth. -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_of_depression#Monoamine_hypothesis
And Neuroplasticity : new biochemical mechanisms, page 27: http://books.google.com/books?id=z8...rAiDm1Z4vlc4IvQccV0&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false
Since neuroplasticity includes changes in physical structure and belief has been found to effect neuroplasticity, the simplest answer in the face of contradictory findings (such as efficacious treatments that do not effect monoamine cells) is that the placebo effect encourages neuroplasticity.
But like I said, you can believe whatever you like.
Evidence of brain chemistry differences in bipolar patients:
http://bipolar.about.com/cs/menu_science/a/press_umich0210.htm
Yeah...placebo effect. That's it. No science here to worry about. lol!
I have never researched alternative therapies though, so I cannot really comment on those.
Between not feeling human, and being depressed, its just not a good combo...