We never went to the moon.

Status
Not open for further replies.
FatFreddy said:
At least tell us what you think of Jay Windley's analysis of the dust-free sand issue.
Click to expand...
His analysis was spot-on. They weren't driving on sand.

BTW I loved your response when your claims were shown to be false:

"I can't do those kinds of calculations."

Perhaps if you learned math the world would make more sense.
 
FatFreddy said:
I figured you people would tap dance around this issue.
Click to expand...

I figured you would be so incredibly stupid that you wouldn't even realise it was raised 20 pages ago and already answered!!

You are such a very dishonest person you fail to answer large numbers of posts, including the one on the previous page.

How come the lens flares move? My AVATAR from the other forum makes your stupid sand claim completely moot. But you are too deceitful to acknowledge this.
 
billvon said:
BTW I loved your response when your claims were shown to be false:

"I can't do those kinds of calculations."

Perhaps if you learned math the world would make more sense.
Click to expand...

To mathematics add -

Geology, basic photography, basic physics, entry level critical thinking skills. For one who argues for this and many other batshit crazy theories, he's none too smart in anything related to them!
 
Members are asked to avoid homophobic comments.
David C said:
I should point out that he's done that on pretty much the whole internet. Totaĺly mental.

Click to expand...
He could be like a Scientologist wanting to spread the word.

Aside, Tom Cruise is a fudge packer.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Dude that forum link, WTF?

"The Well-Tempered Forum is a community devoted to pianos, piano music and piano players. Visit "The Soundboard" for discussion of pianos, music, teachers and performance.
Click to expand...
Are you referring to clavius.org?

I don't quite get the context, but this seems like it might be a pun on "The Well-Tempered Clavier" - a well-known collection of Bach pieces for piano.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
He could be like a Scientologist wanting to spread the word.

Aside, Tom Cruise is a fudge packer.
Click to expand...
I was thinking South Park BTW


And Tom Cruise despises psychology over Scientology and I'm guessing he lost custody of his children to Nicole because he is such an idiot. I'm not even going to look for a reference.

I should apologize for nothing.
 
Last edited:
Well, there don't seem to be any objective truth-seekers here. Any seventh-grade science student could tell you that just transporting and placing large-grained dust-free sand would not cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over and that it would take a team of guys with sledgehammers beating the sand for several days to create that much dust.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-ever-happened.512081/page-29#post-1068254989

Jay Windley* should have given this a little more thought when he was trying to think of a way to obfuscate this. His saying that was a pretty big blunder. He should have thought of a better story.

Nobody here has simply said that he was wrong so nobody here has any credibility. There's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry simply becomes ineffective. The best sophist in the world couldn't convince a ten-year-old that a picture of a zebra is really a picture of a giraffe. The anomaly in question here is about that clear to the viewers who take the time to click on the links and examine the issue. You can't save this one with rhetoric and snide remarks; it's simply too clear.


*
http://clavius.org/about.html
 
FatFreddy said:
Well, there don't seem to be any objective truth-seekers here. Any seventh-grade science student could tell you that just transporting and placing large-grained dust-free sand would not cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over and that it would take a team of guys with sledgehammers beating the sand for several days to create that much dust.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-ever-happened.512081/page-29#post-1068254989

Jay Windley* should have given this a little more thought when he was trying to think of a way to obfuscate this. His saying that was a pretty big blunder. He should have thought of a better story.

Nobody here has simply said that he was wrong so nobody here has any credibility. There's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry simply becomes ineffective. The best sophist in the world couldn't convince a ten-year-old that a picture of a zebra is really a picture of a giraffe. The anomaly in question here is about that clear to the viewers who take the time to click on the links and examine the issue. You can't save this one with rhetoric and snide remarks; it's simply too clear.


*
http://clavius.org/about.html
Click to expand...
Did you report my post for homophobic bigotry?

Forgive me for not staying on topic for this thread...
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Did you report my post for homophobic bigotry?

Forgive me for not staying on topic for this thread...
Click to expand...
As I said before, you can't save this with snide remarks.

If it means anything, I'm straight. I'm not a homophobe but I don't like the idea of gays adopting kids.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Well, I'd appreciate if you'd ask me something instead of just reporting me.
Click to expand...
No. What you wrote was offensive and unnecessary. If your intent was otherwise, the obligation is on you to ensure you define the context. And it's really up to the mods to warn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top