We never went to the moon.

[David C]

I'm not an insider so all I can do is read the alternative press and try to figure out what's going on.

You couldn't figure out a damn thing!

That's also just second-hand info too though so it's hard to come to a firm conclusion. Here's some interesting stuff.

Noam Chomsky

This would be the Noam Chomsky who laughs at the idea that 911 was an inside job. And, you say he was "got at" as part of your self reinforcing delusion. You couldn't make this crap up.

As for your latest Aulis link, how many websites are you going to plaster your spam on?

 

[Michael 345]

Wi-fi is messing with your brain and we all need tin foil hats.

These are true. Have you seen the price of tin foil in the supermarket lately? I buy up the roasting pans around Christmas time. Slightly thicker tin foil makes for a better quality hat you don't look silly in

 

[Write4U]

I'm not an insider so all I can do is read the alternative press and try to figure out what's going on

If you are not an insider, should you not be reading some real scientific news from reliable sources, instead of reading the "alternative press"?

 

[Michael 345]

If you are not an insider, should you not be reading some real scientific news from reliable sources, instead of reading the "alternative press"?

Just as a tiny aside
Did we just crash Casini into Saturn?

 

[Write4U]

Just as a tiny aside
Did we just crash Casini into Saturn?

Apparently it ran out of fuel to maintain orbit and inevitably Saturn will assimilate Casini.......the Bork, you know, they're everywhere. The "alternate press" has true stories of Bork conquests all the time. Don't you read?

 

[Michael 345]

Apparently it ran out of fuel to maintain orbit and inevitably Saturn will assimilate Casini.......the Bork, you know, they're everywhere. The "alternate press" has true stories of Bork conquests all the time. Don't you read?

It happened about 10 pm last night Australia time but I haven't had a chance to catch up with the info - like what is the atmosphere like and the last snapshot it took
The question was more retorical bait
Perhaps split to another thread We Never Crashed On Saturn and It Ain't Got Rings

 

[Michael 345]

Now I know how it was all faked

After all these years I am free of this nagging feeling it was all a joke



Hopefully a better link

 

[FatFreddy]

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-26#post-3475884

That's also just second-hand info too though so it's hard to come to a firm conclusion. Here's some interesting stuff.

Noam Chomsky

This would be the Noam Chomsky who laughs at the idea that 911 was an inside job. And, you say he was "got at" as part of your self reinforcing delusion.

The proof that 9/11 was an inside job is crushing.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...orted-9-11-terrorists.456423/#post-1066183060

The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers: Zwicker (#3

Chomsky's no moron so he knows that 9/11 was an inside job. There are several plausible scenarios that would explain why he says it wasn't. Some people think he's a sleeper shill but his works have been so devestating to the government that I doubt that's the reason; I don't think the government would let one of its shills go that far.
https://chomsky.info/

I think the most likely explanation is that some goons from the government paid him a visit and made him an offer he couldn't refuse. They probably told him that his little granddaughter would have an "Accident" if he didn't play ball with them.

I think that happened with most of the anti-establishment pundits. Look at Amy Goodman.

9 11 Truth Confronts Amy Goodman Democracy Now!

 

[Write4U]

Chomsky's no moron so he knows that 9/11 was an inside job

That is the most bizarre statement I have ever heard in regard to this ageless topic.

 

[FatFreddy]

If you are not an insider, should you not be reading some real scientific news from reliable sources, instead of reading the "alternative press"?

Go back and read post #510 again.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-26#post-3475851

 

[Michael 345]

That is the most bizarre statement I have ever heard in regard to this ageless topic.

I haven't noticed any upsurge in deaths of granddaughters have you?

 

[David C]

The proof that 9/11 was an inside job is crushing.

I think the most likely explanation is that some goons from the government paid him a visit and made him an offer he couldn't refuse. They probably told him that his little granddaughter would have an "Accident" if he didn't play ball with them.

I think that happened with most of the anti-establishment pundits. Look at Amy Goodman.

What a crock of absolute crap. More spam on "crushing" 911 bullshit. Off topic as usual.

Chomsky knows 911 wasn't an inside job and said so. He is basically contradicting your crap so you invent unsupported twaddle about him being got at.

How can anybody be so wrong about everything. You are just useless. Nobody agrees with you(except the not so bright!)..

 

[FatFreddy]

What a crock of absolute crap. More spam on "crushing" 911 bullshit. Off topic as usual.

Chomsky knows 911 wasn't an inside job and said so. He is basically contradicting your crap so you invent unsupported twaddle about him being got at.

How can anybody be so wrong about everything. You are just useless. Nobody agrees with you(except the not so bright!)..

Here's some info you should check out.

Psychologists Help 9 11 Truth Deniers

http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/821-why-do-good-people-become-silentor-worseabout-911-.html


I'm watching this one while I'm waiting for new posts now. I've only watched the first ten minutes but it looks pretty good so far.
9-11 in the Academic Community
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F2TWZ1xfJI

May your wisdom increase.


edit five minutes later...
------------------------------------

Off topic as usual.

Someone else brought it up and I replied to it. If someone else brings it up, should I not reply? Shouldn't you criticize the person who brought it up first if you're going to criticize someone?

I haven't noticed any upsurge in deaths of granddaughters have you?

That's because they give in and play ball.

 

[Write4U]

I haven't noticed any upsurge in deaths of granddaughters have you?

But seems to me there is definitely an upsurge of competition instead of cooperation on the male part of the Human species.

 

[David C]

Here's some info you should check out.

I've read the 911 bullshit. I guarantee you havent read the debunks.

http://www.news.com.au/world/six-re...s/news-story/a59cdac9a894a786544f96b8b7893cee

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

I mentioned 911 as part of your reliance on Chomsky. Your bullshit excuses and follow up spam are typical of your dishonesty.

 

[FatFreddy]

I've read the 911 bullshit. I guarantee you havent read the debunks.

First of all you've already shown that you're not a serious truth-seeker by agreeing with Jay Windley's lame analysis of the dust-free sand issue.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-22#post-3475145
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8135606&postcount=7907
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8135606&postcount=7907
That fact shows that you're not an honest person.


I've see a lot of the "Debunks" and they're all just attempts at damage-control by public relations companies hired by the government. The viewers can decide for themselves. Check out the info on the Pentagon.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/

It's too clear to obfuscate.

 

[David C]

First of all you've already shown that you're not a serious truth-seeker by agreeing with Jay Windley's lame analysis of the dust-free sand issue.

I struggle to make my point it seems. Your opinion about the soil is moronic and uneducated. You are not qualified, he is. You know jack shit about it, your spam opinion is nothing more than crap guessing.

That fact shows that you're not an honest person.

No spammer, it shows I'm not as clueless as you. Agreeing with others who hold alternate viewpoints to idiots is not dishonest!

I've see a lot of the "Debunks" and they're all just attempts at damage-control by public relations companies hired by the government. The viewers can decide for themselves.

The viewers that think you're mad and who never agree with you. You haven't seen the debunks, you avoid them. There is no damage to limit, just noisy and stupid conspiracy nuts to shut up.

Check out the info on the Pentagon.
It's too clear to obfuscate.

It is idiotic beyond words. I won't bother debunking it. You won't read it and it's off topic bullshit.

 

[FatFreddy]

I struggle to make my point it seems. Your opinion about the soil is moronic and uneducated. You are not qualified, he is. You know jack shit about it, your spam opinion is nothing more than crap guessing.

As I've said before, I know you pro-official version posters will never admit anything so all I expect to do here is to get you people to say lame things by posting very clear proof as you have to agree with the official story hell or high water. Jay Windley* had to say something that was pretty lame to maintain his position which showed that he was a paid shill who didn't believe his own arguments. Your agreeing with him shows that you're a paid shill who doesn't believe his own arguments. What Jay Windly said was simply too clear a blunder so go ahead and jump up and down and scream that he was right all you want. Anyone who takes the time to understand this issue will know the truth. Your success rate at swaying the viewers' opinions is close to zero among those who take the time to look at the issue. I can't do much about the people who don't though. Some of them might be swayed by your rhetoric.


*
http://www.clavius.org/about.html

 

[sideshowbob]

Just as a tiny aside
Did we just crash Casini into Saturn?

Casini was faked. Saturn was faked.

 

[David C]

As I've said before, I know you pro-official version posters will never admit anything so all I expect to do here is to get you people to say lame things by posting very clear proof as you have to agree with the official story hell or high water. Jay Windley* had to say something that was pretty lame to maintain his position which showed that he was a paid shill who didn't believe his own arguments. Your agreeing with him shows that you're a paid shill who doesn't believe his own arguments. What Jay Windly said was simply too clear a blunder so go ahead and jump up and down and scream that he was right all you want. Anyone who takes the time to understand this issue will know the truth. Your success rate at swaying the viewers' opinions is close to zero among those who take the time to look at the issue. I can't do much about the people who don't though. Some of them might be swayed by your rhetoric.


*
http://www.clavius.org/about.html

You're a nutcase. Seriously, you make more or less the same posts over and over and actually think your ignorant, hopelessly biased opinion is a fact. You then extrapolate crap conclusions from it.

You got owned yet again. It is a testament to your astonishing delusion that you keep waffling on about swaying viewers and success rates. Nobody believes your insane hoax. Nobody needs swaying. You however, really need to get some help.