We never went to the moon.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep. Fortunately they are in a lower-radiation environment (but as you mention it's still an issue.)

If / when space station becomes private with the occupants be eligible for workers compensation?

:)
 
Worker's Comp laws vary from state to state and nation to nation. I'm sure their option will be laid out in front of them before the sign, same as today.
 
Oh, good. How long until you get banned from here, make a dozen socks, get them banned, and complain you're not being treated fairly?

Well, I hope they won't ban me from this forum for a bullshit reason, but only time will tell, I guess...
 
Last edited:
The name calling was what was deleted.
I read the debate when it was still on-line and I don't remember any name-calliing on Jarrah's part. That would have been way out of character for him so I would have remembered any name-calling. There was no name-calling. The moderator deleted Jarrah's posts because he was making Jay Windley* look bad.


From Popular Science - "By February of 1964, NASA was confident that Apollo crews would be passing through the belts fast enough that the spacecraft’s skin and all the instrumentation lining the walls would be enough protection." And in fact it was; that was proven by the dosimeters the astronauts wore. They were still exposed to radiation, of course - enough that they were seeing periodic flashes in their eyes as gamma radiation caused light emissions within their eyeballs. But it was of a survivable level.

Popular Science is a mainstream publication. It is owned by the same people that purpetuated the hoax. Of course it's going to support Apollo. Here's some stuff on the American media.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...germany-in-1933.401955/page-3#post-1066548138


Please comment on this (from post #845).
Look how he refused to answer a legitimate question here.
http://apollohoax.proboards.com/thread/1584


I looked. You haven't proven anything. It takes a monumentally delusion fool to think the debris is a bubble. It takes a total uneducated goon to not see how fabric behaves in water and how that is clearly impossible for a flag to move like that
The anomalies in the Chinese spacewalk** are simply too clear to obfuscate. You just destroyed your credibility.


*
http://www.clavius.org/about.html

**
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1149.0
 
I read the debate when it was still on-line and I don't remember any name-calliing on Jarrah's part. That would have been way out of character for him so I would have remembered any name-calling. There was no name-calling. The moderator deleted Jarrah's posts because he was making Jay Windley* look bad.

To summarise. You are lying. You wouldn't have seen the posts as they were deleted! It is not out of character. Windley owned him completely


The anomalies in the Chinese spacewalk** are simply too clear to obfuscate. You just destroyed your credibility.

It takes a complete moron to claim this was in a swimming pool. You are the one who has the credibility problem.
 
It takes a complete moron to claim this was in a swimming pool.

Tell us again how this movement is consistent with its being in a vacuum.

------------------------------------------
At the thirty second mark in this clip the astronaut moves the flag from right to left.

The flag flutters the way it would in a medium such as water.
------------------------------------------

All of the viewers are watching.


http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1149.0
 
Popular Science is a mainstream publication. It is owned by the same people that purpetuated the hoax.
Ah. It is such a vast conspiracy that EVERYONE sane is in on it!
Please comment on this (from post #845).
I took a look. Jay is a very wise man.
The anomalies in the Chinese spacewalk** are simply too clear to obfuscate.
The behavior of the flag is quite consistent with deployment in a vacuum. You have just proven yourself a fool. Now please continue!
 
Tell us again how this movement is consistent with its being in a vacuum.

Oh dear, this spamming poster wants to drag this thread off topic yet again, even after a moderator warning.

All of it is consistent with it being in a vacuum. There is no billowing of the flag, no rippling, it moves ridiculously fast unrestricted completely. There is no evidence at all that the viscosity of the water has altered the direction of the fabric

Just because you are dumb enough to claim it is in water doesn't change the burden of proof. Your totally idiotic claim amounts to you saying it moves like it us in water when it doesn't. That is just stupid.

At the thirty second mark in this clip the astronaut moves the flag from right to left.
The flag flutters the way it would in a medium such as water.

Nope. It moves like it should do in a vacuum. Your opinion is garbage.

All of the viewers are watching.

A trifle grandiose. Nobody viewing this agrees with you. You have "checkmated" nobody. You are relentlessly hopeless. Never before have I encountered such a foolish person as you, who is so painfully wrong and not even remotely smart enough to see it.
 
main-qimg-c14b39b294a0e8c5a472269d330aabf1~01.jpg

Little bit of historical trivia

Customs declaration from Apollo 11 on their return

Amazing how much detail they went into to convince the Earth minions we went to the moon

:)
 
So you're saying that a million trivial details all pointing at the same thing beats a fluttering flag?

So you're saying that a million trivial details all pointing at the same thing

PLUS

And employing IIRC over 300,000 people to build the rockets and spaceships, as well as ground support, for a hoax, is simply stunning.

YES

Perhaps as Trump would say

My details are bigger than your details

:)
 
It is me - normally I have a 3 Ping Pong limit

With you I don't think I will bother with even one

Byeeee

*CLICK*
 
Unless I'm mistaken, Michael345, Gawdzilla and sideshowbob are all in the same 'Yes we really went to the Moon' camp.

I get the feeling that one or more tongue-in-cheek comments have inadvertently gotten misinterpreted as earnest, and now one or more of you actually think one or more of the others is a Hoaxer nutbar.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, Michael345, Gawdzilla and sideshowbob are all in the same 'Yes we really went to the Moon' camp.

And I agree with you and have no problem with being in the same camp

The Declaration I posted was supposed to help but looking at it from a different way (perhaps) it could be seen as the details "hoaxers" went to. Truely to my mind hoaxers would not be that smart or fastidious

If if if they were, they would not have missed flag movements and the rest of the stupid stuff put about

And I forgot the idiots name I clicked off - something like I am here - who didn't seem worthy of wasting even one Ping Pong on

:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top