It looks exactly as it does in the video. See my avatar. Damp sand doesn't allow fine sand to be kicked unclumped!! You know this, you are cornered.
Bullshit, we see quite clearly that almost every other step taken kicks large quantities of regolith over previous prints. Always without any dust clouds and frequently we see prints being made, particularly in the 3 clips posted in thatthread.
Maybe you're full of shit. Damp sand doesn't fly like dust across the surface without clumping. Dry sand does, but doesn't take a print. You are cornered.
Liar. You raised the point and there are no alternative scenarios -let's here some. You are cornered.
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/
Every point debunked and ignored by you because you are a coward and a liar.
The moronic objectivity test. What this person is doing is attempting to obtain his own biased and idiotic criteria for automatically dismissing posts that tear his argument to bits. If you disagree with his pathetic claims, you are "not credible", even if you give complete and concise rebuttal to every point he makes. He then ignores any responses and runs away like a squealing coward.
The website detailing debunks for both of these ignored.
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/
Every point debunked and ignored by you because you are a coward and a liar.
Not one thing you present is proof. Every point has a better explanation and you ignore every one of them. The rocks is proof. Third party evidence is proof. The laser reflectors are proof. The ALSEP transmission data is proof. The thousands of photographs are proof. The video showing lunar motion that looks comedic sped up is proof.
Nothing can get through your brainless spam mentality.
You ignore everything.
