In a lot of fields, the quintessential non-expert, or perfect novice, can be a serious asset. Though that’s likely not the case with law. If only…
Still, this is a scenario without precedent. I kinda feel that I might
finally be able to put my lengthy exegesis on the notion of
wu nien (roughly, no thought) within the Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch of Ch’an Buddhism to real use. Kinda like
the prophet in Midsommar, or intellectualized beatnik readings of Zen, back in the day.
Problem with non-expertise is, well, practice makes perfect—or, at least, adequate. You can only be an ignoramus for so long, and while people have long made earnest attempts to cultivate the naive state, you can only get so far. Example: Brian Eno was sufficiently inexpert in Roxy Music, Matching Mole, Portsmouth Sinfonia, but by the time of his first solo record he could no longer claim the title of “non-musician.”
But I’d love to be able to consult for legal firms, just spewing whatever bullshit popped into my head at the moment, though it’d be a hard sell.
I'm only half-joking, really, because I think we are approaching legal avenues previously unexplored. Someone's gotta real creative with this to minimize the potentially catastrophic economic impact.