You forget: look back to your first post here. you claimed that the best government in the history of mankind was one run by a bunch of muslims at an unspecified time and place. We're still waiting to hear where and when.Yazan said:Bush said that this is a Christian War. so why don't you point at Christianity the same way you do with Islam.
path said:That is standard islamic propaganda that almost all muslims swallow whole.
If this is true why then didn't the majority of the balkan peoples, serbs croats greeks montenegrens turn to islam? Why did they continue to struggle against and eventually win freedom from the ottomans?
The same goes for India, Spain, Armenia and countless other nations subjected to islamic rule. I can post endless links about the harsh treatment of dhimmi under islam,
What does Mohammed and his alleged virtues have to do with your claims for - still unspecified- muslim governments?Yazan said:When some (non-Muslim) heard about the greatness of prophet Mohammed (for example), they did dig for the facts by themselves.
http://jamaat.net/hart/verdict.html
False. I pointed out to someone else on another thread that the muslims in Spain killed christians for religious reasons. One of the causes of the downfall of muslim rule in Spain was prejudice between Arab and Berber muslims there and in North Africa. There was prejudice and hostility against local converts to islam by other muslims in Eastern europe, because they were rightly regarded as untrustworthy opportunists. Like most muslims praising islamic tolerance you do not mention polytheists and their fate.The Islamic governments in Europe (for example) treated Arab, non-Arab, Muslims, non-Muslims almost the same way
Most of the muslims in Europe, Asia and Africa took nothing- except slaves- because they lacked the skills to extract what was not treasure in their eyes or because they intended to stay and rule for ever. The reason why the population of Africa has increased so much in the last hundred years is because of the introduction of European medicines and medical techniques.which did not happen when the European ruled Africa or parts of Asia. Muslims did not carry those countries treasures to the Arab world. Where the European tried to take whatever they could to their countries. Tell me what good did the European made in Africa except stealing.
No I am not ignorant of history read my quote I said the majority WERE NOT muslims I never said noone converted. If you take the population of the Balkans that were under Ottoman rule you will see that the % that converted was small indeed. As to how they came to accept islam, the ottomans needed local administrators, the inherent benifit of being a muslim as opposed to a christian under the ottomans did not go unnoticed by some Balkan peoples. By converting to islam a world of possibilities opened up that were not there before the oppressed in society suddenly could become the oppressors, the tax collectors, the police, the governers, etc. There was also the added benefit that the sultans men would not take your boy children away to serve as slaves for the empire when they came every 3 to 5 years.Proud_Muslim said:How ignorant you are of history and in fact of the realities on the ground ? can you tell us how BOSNIA, KOSOVO AND ALBANIA happened to be Muslims ???
Riiiiight so all your islamo sites are the wellspings of truth and objectivityAnd of course all these links are from HATE SITES !! how credible you are my dear goat ????![]()
Such as you, say, of non-muslims.Yazan said:strange how some think that they know the history of others better,
It is not enough to "tell them that what they are saying is not true". You need to produce convincing evidence that it is not true.and even when you tell them that what they are saying is not true, they will keep arguing about it,
It would be a very interesting thread to compare the various crimes of various civilisations. If you feel that strongly, Yazan, why don't you start it?I know the Islamic history and the middle East history, and most of what you say path is wrong, about the slaves if you are an American you really should not talk about it, just remember Africa, it good for you, the Europeans of course were no better in that matter.
Hold hard! If a bunch of arab, muslim kings, sultans or normal guys capture and imprison slaves and say that islam allows them to do, then it is a reasonable inference that they think islam allows them to do that. Slavery was officially abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1961- rather a long time after Mohammed.Arab used to do it before Islam but not after, if bunch of guys (no matter, Kings, Sultans or normal people) did it, it does not mean Arab or Islam.
What if they say they are not crimes, and islam orders them to do it?it is the same unbelievable story of every day, few crimes few bad actions committed by some Muslims and all the 1.3 billion Muslim all over the world would be accused.
Then stop whining and start threads on those topics.Jews are killing civilians destroying whole villages and no body is mentioning them, American and the Europeans committed terrible crimes (like what they did to Africa) and nobody is mentioning Christianity. It’s really disgusting
Such as you, say, of non-muslims.
It is not enough to "tell them that what they are saying is not true". You need to produce convincing evidence that it is not true.
Hold hard! If a bunch of arab, muslim kings, sultans or normal guys capture and imprison slaves and say that islam allows them to do, then it is a reasonable inference that they think islam allows them to do that. Slavery was officially abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1961- rather a long time after Mohammed.
? Are you sure about the number of Muslims, or do you have evidence to support your assertion that there are that many?
EH?Yazan said:of whom ecactly, Americans, according to my scale America is not old enough to hav history at the first place, Euorupe? I believe that I'm closer to the EUoropian bussnies although I'm not there at the time.
Well,according to a palaeantologist, less that a million years is insignificant. Returning to your original posts, it is not your history, but your claim for the superiority of muslim rule that I question.any way I did not claim that I know others history better, I know mine better.
You have not produced one yet on this thread.I usually do[produce evidence and citations]
Again, EH? Again, evidence?the first time I saw something similar to what used to be in KSA was in Oman (to the east of KSA). some of that was real slavery but again by a bunch of people who represents nothing, but most of that is not true, they still even until today, but they are not forced to serve, they serve for money not for free, they do it with their own choice, they are not and were not used to be called slaves they are servants not more, yes owned by some people but as I told you they get paid, they can go away when ever they want. I still don’t like it, but I just wanted to till you it is not like what you think, this is still far less then what the Americans and the Europeans did.