DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Relatable.
This was in response to DaveC's comment that even trained pilots can make mistakes. All that would be required to refute the silly claim that trained pilots never make mistakes would be one example of such a pilot making a mistake. It beggars belief that MR would not be aware of at least one instance of a military pilot making a mistake.Then cite the evidence you have of multiple trained pilots committing errors and FLIR video committing errors and ships' radars committing errors all at the same time in the same incident. Bet you can't find any.
Comment on something from earlier in this thread, a couple of pages back:
This was in response to DaveC's comment that even trained pilots can make mistakes. All that would be required to refute the silly claim that trained pilots never make mistakes would be one example of such a pilot making a mistake. It beggars belief that MR would not be aware of at least one instance of a military pilot making a mistake.
As to the demand to provide evidence that multiple trained pilots made errors etc. in the case of Fravor's tic tac or whatever, I don't believe anybody has made that assertion, so there is no onus to support any such assertion with evidence.
Besides that, we know that errors have been made in interpreting FLIR videos. We have already discussed that at some length in this thread. We also know - and MR is aware - that there are no available radar records of that incident; hence, there is no reason to believe that 2nd-hand reports of what the radar did or did not show are reliable.
Clearly, either MR is stupid, or he was trying to troll DaveC, there. MR ought to wise up, or stop trolling.
Dang it. The other day an article popped up on my Google feed about a video in which a UAP was spotted.
Now I can't find the article.
The video was from the POV of a UAV that was surveilling the other UAV. You can quite clearly recognize the UAV being surveilled in the foreground when a UAP zips by behind it. Anybody seen hide or hair of this video?
It wasn't the target of the surveillance that was interesting, it was the object that flew by in the background. It looked for all the world like a UAP both in visible range and when enhanced, but was afterward positively identified as a commercial jet.The two "captured or sighted by drone" vids I found on YouTube for the opening week of June are surely not it (i.e., they're pretty lame UAPs).
It wasn't the target of the surveillance that was interesting, it was the object that flew by in the background. It looked for all the world like a UAP both in visible range and when enhanced, but was afterward positively identified as a commercial jet.
1 week and 3 days old, as it happens.LOL @ James digging up old posts to flame me over. Such an exemplary moderator..
Yes, this is the one. It is surprising how much it looks like so many other recordings of UAPs.
It was over a month ago Sean Kirkpatrick explained this as an ''aircraft''.Yes, this is the one. It is surprising how much it looks like so many other recordings of UAPs.
I saw it in the context of an article, and the article had a little more description than the blurb under this Youtube video.
All those properties are consistent with a pair of flying birds. Did they make an effort to rule out a pair of flying birds?FLIR video of a uap captured off the coast of Aguadilla Puerto Rico from a customs/border control plane. Analysis of uap indicates a spherical object of about 104 degrees in temp and about 5 ft in diameter. No indication of heat exhaust. Object flying against an 18mph wind, so not a balloon. Object skims the surface of the water and appears to split into two objects! Seems to be another example of the spherical uaps mentioned by AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick at the latest NASA UAP meeting. See what you think..
All those properties are consistent with a pair of flying birds. Did they make an effort to rule out a pair of flying birds?
Did they? Or are you simply assuming that?They ruled out a bird or birds
This looks nothing like a commercial aircraft:Here's a FLIR video of flying birds. The UAP looks nothing like them..
I wonder what the approximate average temperature of a goose is?...about 104 degrees in temp...
I wonder what the approximate size of a goose is?... and about 5 ft ...
I wonder how fast geese fly?Object flying against an 18mph wind...
"Signature" doesn't match that of a plane.Signature doesn't match that of bird. If you'd look at the video you'd see that. The uap is spherical and has no flapping wings as we see in the FLIR bird video.