2. The car can be started by remote control an you or sombody else or a animal pushed the "start" transmit button.!!!
You should have waited till decent prize money was on offer. The suspense is absolutely killing me. Well metaphorically and jokingly speaking.2. The car can be started by remote control an you or sombody else or a animal pushed the "start" transmit button.!!!
You've solved half the mystery.2. The car can be started by remote control an you or sombody else or a animal pushed the "start" transmit button.!!!
Making your 'counterexample' already half irrelevant. Once 'full disclosure' happens, it will be summarily buried as formally fully irrelevant. Something obvious from the outset.You've solved half the mystery.
Did you leave the remote near a salt shaker/container?Given:
My car, sitting in my driveway, in the middle of the night, spontaneously started up. No one was nearby, not even me.
Did you leave the remote near a salt shaker/container?

Sorry, if this is a mock investigation, then answers should come as findings, not yes/no.You've solved half the mystery.
The car did have a remote start fob. (which is not the same as the push start the author mentions).2. The car can be started by remote control an you or sombody else or a animal pushed the "start" transmit button.!!!
Indeed, it will be my example that puts the lie to the article you presented here. That's the idea of a refutation: claim is canceled by counter-claim and they both disappear.Making your 'counterexample' already half irrelevant. Once 'full disclosure' happens, it will be summarily buried as formally fully irrelevant.
Nice. Draw a conclusion at the outset, before any evidence is in. How emotional. You're too interested in refuting me to be objective about the analysis.Something obvious from the outset.
Nonsense. You clearly have no clear idea of what refuting entails. From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/refuteIndeed, it will be my example that puts the lie to the article you presented here. That's the idea of a refutation: claim is canceled by counter-claim and they both disappear....
Ha ha ha ha. YOU have deliberately baited then dragged your heels in a pointless time-wasting game. There is no way you can come out of this without egg all over your face.Nice. Draw a conclusion at the outset, before any evidence is in.
This is great stuff! You are thinking like a skeptic."My car, sitting in my driveway, in the middle of the night, spontaneously started up. No one was nearby, not even me."
The last sentence is both redundant and a deflection. The key word there is 'spontaneously'. From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spontaneously
Definition of spontaneous
1 : proceeding from natural feeling or native tendency without external constraint
2 : arising from a momentary impulse
3 : controlled and directed internally : self-acting spontaneous movement characteristic of living things
4 : produced without being planted or without human labor : indigenous
5 : developing or occurring without apparent external influence, force, cause, or treatment
6 : not apparently contrived or manipulated : natural
Only 3 and/or 5 could be relevant, and it's a sure bet neither sense of 'spontaneously' can be made to stick to the actual details of your 'self-starting' car episode.
The fob was tucked into my shorts on my laundry pile. No one and nothing went near it.
I was in bed. Six feet away.4. How far away was the closest person to the basket when the car started.???
No. The fob itself was not involved. However, the fact that there is a fob is what facilitated the event.5. Did sombody do somptin that caused the fob to activate an cause the engine to start.???
I was in bed. Six feet away.
No. The fob itself was not involved. However, the fact that there is a fob is what facilitated the event.
No, but you're on the right track.You pushed buttons on a unrelated transmiter an to you'r surprize the car started.!!!
So, somehow it's #2: "arising from a momentary impulse"? Sorry to spoil things yet again for you, but it should be clear the contextual use of word 'impulse' there is in the mental/psychological sense - i.e. impulse ≡ urge.This is great stuff! You are thinking like a skeptic.
Question the accounts. Question the claims. Root out ambiguity. Ask what's not in the reports. Follow up. Confirm, verify.
Apply that to your UFO accounts - and especially your TV shows.
Here, I can answer your questions, and clarify. (Ambiguity is not always nefarious. Sometimes it simply means you haven't sufficiently investigated yet and you're still at the beginning of the investigation.)
Indeed, of those definitions of spontaneity, several apply:
#5. It happened without apparent external influence.
#6. It was not contrived or manipulated.
But one of them is bang on - almost verbatim the solution to the mystery. It's #2.
I'm genuinely impressed you're rising to it, Q.
7. Garage door opener... an thats my final offer unless im wrong.!!!No, but you're on the right track.
OK.7. Garage door opener... an thats my final offer unless im wrong.!!!
OK.
I live on a streetcar line. Passing streetcars cause sparking in poles/overhead wires. Sparks emit electromagnetic pulses. EMPs can flood receivers with radio noise, which is what they're listennig for to activate.
My car, with its aftermarket remote start, started up as a streetcar passed and sparked.
I live on a streetcar line. Passing streetcars cause sparking in poles/overhead wires. Sparks emit electromagnetic pulses. EMPs can flood receivers with radio noise, which is what they're listennig for to activate.
My car, with its aftermarket remote start, started up as a streetcar passed and sparked.