Trump is "a clear and present danger"

Know your sources:
Michael Hayden is employed by the chertoff group which is part of the mic.
Hillary hawk is a war monger, Trump might break their rice bowls, so, of course they will try to use scare tactics to insure that they continue to get rich off of war, death, and destruction.

Right, it's all just another Trumpian Conspiracy and Trump is the only honest person in the bunch.

You don't really believe that do you? Trump is honest and the rest are secret conspirators [even though many are retired now]? How much evidence do you need to see the man is total boloney - a con man. I can cite example after example. These are all people who have dedicated their careers to public service. Trump has only dedicated himself to self service and personal wealth.

How many conspirators are there, hundreds, thousands? How do you know who is who?
 
Last edited:
You take a bite out of the apple and think yourself to be in an orchard?

Let's just take these one at a time.
 
To any American citizens out there who may be reading this, this is what the election campaigns look like from outside.

Donald Trump is doing his best imitation of a Mafia boss, and he just put out a contract on his rival, Hillary Clinton. He hinted, strongly, to any of his "beautiful" 2nd amendment people who might have been thinking about it, that they now have his blessing--they can kiss the ring later.
 
Yeah, like, it was amazing, just amazing, how easy I translated it to somethin' the Don would say:

“By the way, and if she gets the pick
(the pick? like the way Jimmy did that guy in Jersey?)

. . . —if she gets the pick of her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I dunno.”
(he knows some Second Amendment people, good people, . . . maybe there's somethin' they can do?)
 
Last edited:
What does the Constitution say about fair and impartial polling of Americans? Does it tell you anything about how to interpret the results of national or statewide polls?
 
What does the Constitution say about fair and impartial polling of Americans? Does it tell you anything about how to interpret the results of national or statewide polls?
None of that is in the constitution.
The media usually misleads and misstates everything.
 
We do still have a constitution.
but maybe not for much longer....
If I am not mistaken most democracies require at least, a two 'party' system to function. Trump appears to be doing all he can to destroy his own party. If he succeeds, democracy in the USA will suffer accordingly.
 
Last edited:
sculptor said:
The media usually misleads and misstates everything.
But Trump doesn't mislead? He doesn't "misstate", like, he's just joking about a lot of the things he says? The things the media reports on, like, the entire content of speeches, you can watch the youtube feeds of what looks like the real Donald Trump or a very, very close likeness.

That's all misleading media bullshit? How dare they.
 
Parties change.
Any whig candidates lately?

The dnc and rnc have lost touch with the average american. Both are neocons. Maybe they merge and a new party arises?
 
But Trump doesn't mislead? He doesn't "misstate", like, he's just joking about a lot of the things he says? The things the media reports on, like, the entire content of speeches, you can watch the youtube feeds of what looks like the real Donald Trump or a very, very close likeness.

That's all misleading media bullshit? How dare they.

If everything you get is filtered through the media, you are feeding your brain on a diet of bullshit.
 
sculptor said:
If everything you get is filtered through the media, you are feeding your brain on a diet of bullshit.
So where are you getting your unfiltered bullshit from?

I imagine you've watched Trump's speeches at his rallies, without having been there in person? You've watched youtube videos and maybe some Fox News?
My Mafia-style take on it, is because I'm feeding my brain on media bullshit, unlike the bullshit you have access to?
 
See, you hear them say they're voting for Trump, cause he says what he means. Then they say he didn't mean what he just said.

Ask Rudy, he'll tell ya.
 
See, you hear them say they're voting for Trump, cause he says what he means. Then they say he didn't mean what he just said.

Ask Rudy, he'll tell ya.
Sh*t, I say what I mean!... Does that make me qualify for president of the U.S of A
 
the nature of globalization..the whole world is watching how so many American people can nominate a person like Trump for President

Ask yourself why Germany accepted Hitler?
(not meaning to compare Trump to Hitler)---the reference was to the electorate, the people who have been poorly served, and are likely to continue to be poorly served by Hillary hawk Clinton.

Had the dnc not cheated, the choice might well have been between Sanders and Trump.
 
Ask yourself why Germany accepted Hitler?
(not meaning to compare Trump to Hitler)---the reference was to the electorate, the people who have been poorly served, and are likely to continue to be poorly served by Hillary hawk Clinton.
I am not sure that the USA is ready to seriously entertain fascism as a way to go...
The abdication of the German Monarchy led to the ending of WW1 and the German people didn't like having to pay reparations...( for their Monarchs territorial indulgences) so they cheated and elected a fascist to solve their problems and well... you know ...the rest is history...
Generalized sweeping statement:
"So many common Americans don't like having to pay for their own past indulgence and of course Fascism rears it's ugly head as always..."

Had the dnc not cheated, the choice might well have been between Sanders and Trump.
perhaps... according to the very mass media you claim to be lacking in integrity...
 
Back
Top