Towards a New Physics

Ioannis said:
I apologize for that. It is the price I pay now from my older stupidity when I was sending hundreds of e-mails per hour. Some Spam Trackers have black listed my IP and most probably Google use their analytics. I think I have to make something about it.

However, you do not have to be afraid there is no virus on the web site.
Click to expand...
i do not know how to explain that you did not understand my comment in anyway of--except to simply say--you do not comprehend my comment.
 
krash661 said:
that speaks volumes
Click to expand...
Thank you krash661! I have the link on top of the Web Page in order people interested to read my work just to click and download it. In forums like this one and other the members are normally not interested to read the work of another "crackpot" (as they call me), therefore first I have to share the main argument and then whoever is interested may visit my web site and download the paper.
 
Ioannis said:
Thank you krash661! I have the link on top of the Web Page in order people interested to read my work just to click and download it. In forums like this one and other the members are normally not interested to read the work of another "crackpot" (as they call me), therefore first I have to share the main argument and then whoever is interested may visit my web site and download the paper.
Click to expand...
maybe comprehend the significance of vixra will help you understand my comments.
 
Ioannis said:
Why you just tell me what you have in mind.
Click to expand...
i would have assumed that, if you are such a science genius and attempt to claim actual scientist are wrong, that you should have known about this beforehand--odd.
Actually I do not care.
Click to expand...
as for anyone else, why else are you here and also submitting to Vixra?
:) (shakes head)--carry on.
 
i would have assumed that, if you are such a science genius and attempt to claim actual scientist are wrong, that you should have known about this beforehand--odd.
Click to expand...
I am not any kind of genius. I am just like everyone on this forum. Allow me to say that I may create something precious from simply uninteresting for most of people and this is what I prove through my work. My education is of a Technological Institution (it is NOT a University Degree).

as for anyone else, why else are you here and also submitting to Vixra?
Click to expand...
I submitted to Vixra just to have a Date & Time reference of publication on the Internet independently whether my web site is up or down (I have a subscription for a year. Maybe later I decide to put it down due to financial difficulties.) . That is all.

My main goal by going around the forums is to trigger interest to read the work of a "crackpot" (me) that could have significant implications. In order to achieve this the Author (me) has to suggest some experiments. The second experiment I propose in my work and web site is a classical Electrostatic Deflection experiment having a small detail. This small detail if applied correctly will change Physics forever (of course If I am right). Electrostatic deflection experiments are based on Relativistic Electrodynamics. Somewhere in the middle (it is just a phrase) I discovered if the Electrostatic Deflection have some specific adjustments (in terms of Field Strength), the Relativistic Deflection will start to deviate significantly from the expect result.

All kind of Forums have active or retired Physicists. So, besides to make known my work to everybody as to specialists and non-specialists (I am NOBODY, do not forget I do not belong to scientific community) maybe one of those 1000 Physicists could try something on experimental level. Who knows?
 
Ioannis said:
that could have significant implications.
Click to expand...
that is/was my point-- there are none--which is why you are here claiming actual scientist are wrong and submitting to vixra. as obvious as you endlessly make it, you simply have no clue of any of this.
(of course If I am right).
Click to expand...
except--of course--due to science--you are not--which again, nothing of use--again, which is why you are submitting to vixra, and i want to say that i am sure i am not the first to tell you this.
 
except--of course--due to science--you are not--which again, nothing of use--again, which is why you are submitting to vixra, and i want to say that i am sure i am not the first to tell you this.
Click to expand...
krash661, I just disclosed to you what I am and what I am not. If I am right that is good. If I am wrong then I will stop bother myself and spending days and years of my life (I work on such things more than 15 years). Anyway, who cares.

What is true is that people who spend their time creating something (this is difficult to be understood from those doing nothing) whatever that is (family, music, poetry, designing, etc), it comes from inside (from their soul) meaning they are driven in a way. Of course all kind of undertakings are not always successful. This is the reason we are called humans because we make mistakes and try to learn from them as long we live upon this spinning ball (earth). Another question. Are you human?
 
Ioannis said:
krash661, I just disclosed to you what I am and what I am not. If I am right that is good. If I am wrong then I will stop bother myself and spending days and years of my life (I work on such things more than 15 years). Anyway, who cares.

What is true is that people who spend their time creating something (this is difficult to be understood from those doing nothing) whatever that is (family, music, poetry, designing, etc), it comes from inside (from their soul) meaning they are driven in a way. Of course all kind of undertakings are not always successful. This is the reason we are called humans because we make mistakes and try to learn from them as long we live upon this spinning ball (earth). Another question. Are you human?
Click to expand...
again, another point of mine is that you are not qualified to be right and simply will never recognize why you simply do not understand that you are already wrong, simply because since you have no formal education nor experience and it is massively obvious that you do not due to your obvious ignorance of these sciences--which i am not sure how you are able to sit here and pretend that you are revolutionizing sciences--it is massively comical in a pathetic way. but overall, :) carry on.

creating something
Click to expand...
except--what are you creating, that is nothing more than inaccurate nonsense, that will lead to misinformation?
 
krash661 said:
except--what are you creating, that is nothing more than inaccurate nonsense, that will lead to misinformation?
Click to expand...
Well you already know the link where I have placed my work.

again, another point of mine is that you are not qualified to be right and simply will never recognize why you simply do not understand that you are already wrong, simply because since you have no formal education nor experience and it is massively obvious that you do not due to your obvious ignorance of these sciences--which i am not sure how you are able to sit here and pretend that you are revolutionizing sciences--it is massively comical in a pathetic way. but overall, :) carry on.
Click to expand...
Do not worry I will not sit around for long. Maybe this is my last post. I do not pretend. I have something valuable to share and this is not just words. If it true or not it remains to be proved experimentally or simply to be ignored (as usual due to all you mentioned previously). Good Night!

Towards a New Physics: http://www.ioannisxydous.net.gr/
 
krash661 said:
again, your obvious ignorance is clear..
Click to expand...

Personally I havent found anything interesting on Ioanis theory, but I think it would be nice, if people could respond to his theory and not dismissing him just because he has published on vixra or because he has no PhD in physics.
Surely, there are very very few valuable papers on vixra and there are very few valuable inputs into physics by people without PhD, but there are same rare cases, in which it was true. For example I know that some unaffiliated people with PhD had some controversial papers and were rejected by arxiv and without any further alternative they published it on vixra. It is a blind elitism to automatically dismiss everybody who ever published on vixra.
 
Ultron said:
Personally I havent found anything interesting on Ioanis theory, but I think it would be nice, if people could respond to his theory and not dismissing him just because he has published on vixra or because he has no PhD in physics.
Surely, there are very very few valuable papers on vixra and there are very few valuable inputs into physics by people without PhD, but there are same rare cases, in which it was true. For example I know that some unaffiliated people with PhD had some controversial papers and were rejected by arxiv and without any further alternative they published it on vixra. It is a blind elitism to automatically dismiss everybody who ever published on vixra.
Click to expand...

OK. He cannot string an argument together, he has previous form for posting nonsense on this forum and he has published (in badly broken English) only in vixra, which was set up expressly for people whose articles were too feeble or cranky to make it into arXiv.

But, just for you (and because it is raining so I cannot get out into the garden :smile:) , I have now downloaded and read the first page of his paper. This seems (?) to be all about the supposed paradox of an isolated electron absorbing two photons, coming from opposite directions, simultaneously. He points out that in this scenario it is not possible for momentum and energy to be both conserved. Well that's quite right, but the point is that, as I have indicated earlier, an isolated electron does not absorb photons, for precisely this reason. Only electrons in bound states do so.

He could have found that out by a bit of web research. So there is no paradox and no opportunity for a new theory to resolve it.

But then, he has, by his own admission, no training and thinks he can just make up a "New Physics" without bothering to learn the current physics first. I have no time for that sort of thing. How the hell can you claim to have discovered something new, unless you first check to see whether you have? He's just wasting everybody's time, including, sadly, his own.
 
Last edited:
Ultron said:
Personally I havent found anything interesting on Ioanis theory, but I think it would be nice, if people could respond to his theory and not dismissing him just because he has published on vixra or because he has no PhD in physics.
Surely, there are very very few valuable papers on vixra and there are very few valuable inputs into physics by people without PhD, but there are same rare cases, in which it was true. For example I know that some unaffiliated people with PhD had some controversial papers and were rejected by arxiv and without any further alternative they published it on vixra. It is a blind elitism to automatically dismiss everybody who ever published on vixra.
Click to expand...
understand what vixra is about.
 
exchemist said:
OK. He cannot string an argument together, he has previous form for posting nonsense on this forum and he has published (in badly broken English) only in vixra, which was set up expressly for people whose articles were too feeble or cranky to make it into arXiv.

But, just for you (and because it is raining so I cannot get out into the garden :smile:) , I have now downloaded and read the first page of his paper. This seems (?) to be all about the supposed paradox of an isolated electron absorbing two photons, coming from opposite directions, simultaneously. He points out that in this scenario it is not possible for momentum and energy to be both conserved. Well that's quite right, but the point is that, as I have indicated earlier, an isolated electron does not absorb photons, for precisely this reason. Only electrons in bound states do so.

He could have found that out by a bit of web research. So there is no paradox and no opportunity for a new theory to resolve it.

But then, he has, by his own admission, no training and thinks he can just make up a "New Physics" without bothering to learn the current physics first. I have no time for that sort of thing. How the hell can you claim to have discovered something new, unless you first check to see whether you have? He's just wasting everybody's time, including, sadly, his own.
Click to expand...

You are right, with only a little remark, that even Einstein would not make it today to post on arxiv as Patent office employee, because arxiv automatically rejects papers of academically unaffiliated people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top