timojin speculates we have not left the solar system / NASA is a lie

Status
Not open for further replies.
And of course couple with your excellent summary, would be the genuine nature of those questioning any meaning/subject or science discipline.
"ask questions when he has absolutely no intention of accepting an answer, illustrates his agenda".
I never saw "ask questions when he has absolutely no intention of accepting an answer, illustrates his agenda", in Ophiolite's Post #35...
Could you possibly be referring to an "agenda" as exhibited by the Originator/Poster of this Thread ? - : http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-static-universe.139218/
 
I agree, but might it not have been more productive for you to point out his misunderstanding of the usage employed by Kittmaru, rather than - apparently - arguing that Kittmaru was wrong?
No.
I simply asked : "Kittamaru, could you please explain why you construed timojin's statement : "I believe cosmology fund should be reduced, we had enough of pictures and expensive dishes , we are not able to get out of our solar system", as "conspiracy theory b*llsh*t?"
I never stated nor implied "that Kittamaru was wrong" - I never even used the word "wrong".
I simply asked.

I just want to note that the truncated quote creates a misleading impression of my viewpoint. In full I said "In this instance DMOE gives the appearance of using pedantry to justify deliberate misunderstanding."

It would be childish to attempt to deliberately give an erroneous impression of your viewpoint because anyone can read your full Post.
Therefore, Ophiolite, I saw no reason to quote it in full

The distinction is an important one, at least to me. As quoted by you I am accusing you of using pedantry etc. As I wrote it I am making you aware that your actions suggest you may be using pedantry etc. I think you will agree these are important differences.
Actually, I cannot agree.
I speak my mind, period.
I never accused you of anything, period.
I, again very simply, directly responded to/addressed your viewpoint, Ophiolite, period.

May I ask of you, Ophiolite, why it appears, to me at least, that you seem to be deliberately reading things into my Posts that I have not authored?

Now, Timojin, do you understand the variety of things that may be meant by "mankind leaving the solar system"?
...
Possibly you could make that query in a Post directed to timojin, Ophiolite?
You do see that it possibly "gives the appearance" that you may be confusing me with timojin?
 
Timojin has repeatedly made it clear that he sees no benefit in NASA and its exploration of space. If he wishes to profess innocence that specifically humans have not left the solar system, I do not feel that many will believe him. Additionally, he acted (quite intentionally from appearances) to derail the previous thread in preference to his own agenda; he has had warnings before about posting "bad science" in the science sections... both verbal, and infractions... obviously, they have not stuck.

You and your pal poddoboy concocted this conspiracy to get me out, poddoboy have been working on this long time ago. Now you succeeded in doing by breaking up an OP. and picking up some thing to incriminate me that I said . something contrary that voyage newer left the solar system , Speaking about dishonesty, just look at your present action . You got your position not long ago, and you want to exercise it . So be it . I know in my mind I am honest , and I sleep well , to be on this forum is not my livelihood, I can take or live it .
 
You and your pal poddoboy concocted this conspiracy to get me out, poddoboy have been working on this long time ago.
Don't be so daft timojin......There are many reasons why your questions were moved, not the less being your own agenda, which you have shown many times.
 
I never saw "ask questions when he has absolutely no intention of accepting an answer, illustrates his agenda", in Ophiolite's Post #35...
Could you possibly be referring to an "agenda" as exhibited by the Originator/Poster of this Thread ? - : http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-static-universe.139218/
I didn't say it was in anything Ophiolite said: If you were attentive enough, you would have noticed I said....
"And of course couple with your excellent summary"
You are familar with the word "couple"?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple
something that joins or links two things together:
 
This is getting out of hand dmoe. It does increasingly appear as if you just want to have an altercation.
No.
I simply asked : "Kittamaru, could you please explain why you construed timojin's statement : "I believe cosmology fund should be reduced, we had enough of pictures and expensive dishes , we are not able to get out of our solar system", as "conspiracy theory b*llsh*t?"
I never stated nor implied "that Kittamaru was wrong" - I never even used the word "wrong".
I simply asked.
Yet even when you received an answer you kept asking. When someone keeps asking in such a manner it surely sounds as if they think the person is wrong.

It would be childish to attempt to deliberately give an erroneous impression of your viewpoint because anyone can read your full Post.
Therefore, Ophiolite, I saw no reason to quote it in full
Strawman. I did not suggest you deliberately tried to give an erroneous impression. I stated that you had given an erroneous impression. My words are rarely memorable , so most members will be reading your quote of my words, not diligently checking on what I said several posts and some time before.
And I repeat, as quoted I am accusing you, as written by me in full I am not.

Actually, I cannot agree.
I speak my mind, period.
I never accused you of anything, period.
I, again very simply, directly responded to/addressed your viewpoint, Ophiolite, period.
And here is the strawman again. You quoted me in such a way as to create the impression that I had accused you. I am not now, nor have I in the past, accused you of accusing me. I am now most decidedly accusing you of sloppy writing and an inability to admit you are wrong.

May I ask of you, Ophiolite, why it appears, to me at least, that you seem to be deliberately reading things into my Posts that I have not authored?
I am deliberately pointing out that the English words you have quoted from my post mean that I was accusing you, yet those words are incomplete and therefore misleading. If you cannot see that I can offer you discounted English comprehension lessons.

Possibly you could make that query in a Post directed to timojin, Ophiolite?' You do see that it possibly "gives the appearance" that you may be confusing me with timojin?
It is a common practice on many forums to respond to multiple posts. I signaled the change of direction in two ways: beginning the sentence with the word "Now", which is a standard way of so signalling, and by naming Timojin.

In anticipation of even more dumb ass rhetoric I shall be putting you on Ignore for the balance of the week.
 
I didn't say it was in anything Ophiolite said: If you were attentive enough, you would have noticed I said....
"And of course couple with your excellent summary"
You are familar with the word "couple"?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple
something that joins or links two things together:

Surely, paddoboy, you must be able to understand that by Posting (in quotes!) : "ask questions when he has absolutely no intention of accepting an answer, illustrates his agenda", in Ophiolite's Post #35, and not pointing out that you were quoting yourself, that it could be misunderstood?
My apologies, paddoboy, for my grievous misunderstanding.
May I beg your understanding and forgiveness?

BTW, thank you for providing a definition for the word you used : couple...

Speaking of, and in reference to "If you were attentive enough, you would have noticed I said....", it seems that you were also somewhat inattentive, or you would have noticed that I posited a direct question to you in relation to another word that you used in your Post # 37, : agenda

So, paddoboy, could you provide an answer to my query?
- Could you possibly be referring to an "agenda" as exhibited by the Originator/Poster of this Thread ? - : http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-static-universe.139218/
 
How the hell did you guy managed to screw up my statement .

I simply asked : "Kittamaru,: "I believe cosmology fund should be reduced, we had enough of pictures and expensive dishes , we are not able to get out of our solar system",
 
How the hell did you guy managed to screw up my statement .

I simply asked : "Kittamaru,: "I believe cosmology fund should be reduced, we had enough of pictures and expensive dishes , we are not able to get out of our solar system",
The first half of that is baseless personal opinion, and the second half is a falsehood.

If you would care to qualify or retract the falsehood, this thread could die a peaceful death.

The power is in you, Tim.
 
Tim, if you would care to qualify or retract this statement, this thread could die a peaceful death.

Retrac what.? let the individual that purposle screw it up in their malicious mind and . and posted as if I said so. This is dirty.And you want me to retract something I did not say
 
My apologies, paddoboy, for my grievous misunderstanding.
May I beg your understanding and forgiveness?
Certainly.
So, paddoboy, could you provide an answer to my query?
- Could you possibly be referring to an "agenda" as exhibited by the Originator/Poster of this Thread ? - : http://www.sciforums.com/threads/the-static-universe.139218/
As I said yesterday, I've been advised to not interact with you by at least two mods due to facts that can be seen in many past threads you have started re criticism of myself and those mods.
But I'll answer your question....
My only agenda is science, but with all due resepct, I would be more concerned about your own agenda.
I may now again accept the advice given to me. Bye dmoe.
 
I poster earlier that it takes over 30 years to get out of the solar system , and man have already problem one year in space and in our own solar system . So you would like to state that we will be able to send a man out of our solar system , is that what you want.
I would say you are du hast ein fogel ihn kopf. At what age will you send him and what are you going to feed him for 60 ++ years ?
 
As I said yesterday, I've been advised to not interact with you by at least two mods due to facts that can be seen in many past threads you have started re criticism of myself and those mods.
But I'll answer your question....
My only agenda is science, but with all due resepct, I would be more concerned about your own agenda.
I may now again accept the advice given to me. Bye dmoe.
meh...
But at least you got in you prerequisite "ad hominem attack"...
 
I poster earlier that it takes over 30 years to get out of the solar system , and man have already problem one year in space and in our own solar system . So you would like to state that we will be able to send a man out of our solar system , is that what you want.
I would say you are du hast ein fogel ihn kopf. At what age will you send him and what are you going to feed him for 60 ++ years ?
This is a profoundly different claim than you originally made.

"We" have already escaped the solar system.
 
Mod Note

Two infractions issued in this thread and frankly, countless others could have been issued to the same individuals for trolling and flaming behaviour. This thread has basically become a flame thread, with certain individuals continuing with problematic behaviour that a) saw them receive infractions in this thread and b) saw them receive similar infractions in other threads. One of whom has exhibited the same trolling behaviour towards another member and had been warned about repeatedly on numerous occasions in the past.

This thread is now closed and will be sent to the Cesspool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top