Isn't this Farsight's?
No, he commented on the original post and it does sound a lot like something he's write but this is JohnDuffields explanation, Full credits given of course.
Isn't this Farsight's?
This is what ?
Hi guys. Anybody got a problem? Anybody want to talk about time? How about you Tach?
What is it you want to say about time?
Hi guys. Anybody got a problem? Anybody want to talk about time?
Given that time can be observed to pass in the conventional sense, and clocks show it passes at different rates in different energy density environments, can we say that time simply passes, and the rate at which we measure it to pass depends on the energy density of the environment in which the clock is observed?Hi guys. Anybody got a problem? Anybody want to talk about time? How about you Tach?
Dufoe: I'm John Duffield. Sorry if it wasn't clear.
What is image 5 supposed to represent?I've decided to remove the content of this post as it seems to only be resulting in the flaming of the original author which was not my intention.
Nothing I haven't said already. For example here's an old Time Explained on this forum. I did a few versions, improving them in response to feedback. In a nutshell, time doesn't really flow and you can't literally travel through it, so time travel is science fiction. In addition closed timelike curves don't offer any prospect of time travel because spacetime is an abstract mathematical space which models all times at once. You can draw a worldline in it to represent motion through space over time, but you can't move through it. A closed timelike curve gives at best something like Groundhog Day. All in all time travel makes for some great movies, but it isn't physics.What is it you want to say about time?