This is my documents. Please point out any mistakes and let me know. Please do this to help me, thank you.

J

jalaldn

Registered Member
[Possibly dangerous link to an unknown document on a google drive removed by moderator]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I published a study that said light is real-time. Why don't you prove that it's wrong?
It would be very helpful if you could tell me why it is wrong and give me a reason.



I also published a study that confirmed electricity in real time. If you could prove it wrong to me, I would be happy to give this study a reason to burn.



I am doing this as my duty and I have no right to destroy it. I believe it has ruined a part of my life. I need a good reason to throw this away, so please help me.
 
jalaldn said:
I published a study that said light is real-time. Why don't you prove that it's wrong?
It would be very helpful if you could tell me why it is wrong and give me a reason.



I also published a study that confirmed electricity in real time. If you could prove it wrong to me, I would be happy to give this study a reason to burn.



I am doing this as my duty and I have no right to destroy it. I believe it has ruined a part of my life. I need a good reason to throw this away, so please help me.
Click to expand...
Nobody sensible is going to click on links to an unknown destination. It could be malware. You need to post your idea here, where we can see it without clicking links.
 
exchemist said:
Nobody sensible is going to click on links to an unknown destination. It could be malware. You need to post your idea here, where we can see it without clicking links.
Click to expand...
Yup, and by chance he just signed up today so he could post a seemly innocent link with an innocent little story. LMAO!!
 
jalaldn said:
I published a study that said light is real-time. Why don't you prove that it's wrong?
Click to expand...
Why don't you give us a summary of it here, and tell us why it's right?
jalaldn said:
I also published a study that confirmed electricity in real time.'
Click to expand...
What does that mean? Don't you confirm electricity in real time every time you turn on a light?
jalaldn said:
I am doing this as my duty and I have no right to destroy it. I believe it has ruined a part of my life. I need a good reason to throw this away, so please help me.
Click to expand...
I'm puzzled as to how proving that light or electricity "is real-time" could ruin a person's life. Do you want to tell us what happened?
 
jalaldn said:
I published a study that said light is real-time. Why don't you prove that it's wrong?
It would be very helpful if you could tell me why it is wrong and give me a reason.
Click to expand...
It is not our job to prove you wrong. The onus is on you to make a case that you're right.

And the difficulty you're having is that you are not expressing what's in your head in written form. We're getting snippets - glimpses - but that's just incoherence. You need to learn how to write a paper that's comprehensible.

Here is an example:

"...light is real-time..."

These terms make no sense together, without more context. It is as meaningful as "dogs are synchronous".



Finally, we're not going to go looking through your PDF document to proofread it. This is a discussion forum. Your obligation is to bring your ideas here. Write them out - one or two ideas at a time, no more. We will ask for clarification before moving on to next steps. The first question is almost certainly going to be: why?
 
Last edited:
A new theory of physics AND number theory in the same week? Not to be outdone, I'm working on my new theory of life science as we speak.
A snippet. "Cells are not reproduction because DNA is respiratory not just biochemical."
 
DaveC426913 said:
It is not our job to prove you wrong. The onus is on you to make a case that you're right.

And the difficulty you're having is that you are not expressing what's in your head in written form. We're getting snippets - glimpses - but that's just incoherence. You need to learn how to write a paper that's comprehensible.

Here is an example:

"...light is real-time..."

These terms make no sense together, without more context. It is as meaningful as "dogs are synchronous".



Finally, we're not going to go looking through your PDF document to proofread it. This is a discussion forum. Your obligation is to bring your ideas here. Write them out - one or two ideas at a time, no more. We will ask for clarification before moving on to next steps. The first question is almost certainly going to be: why?
Click to expand...
“Dogs are synchronous” :biggrin:

He’s just had his thread on the other forum shut down because he refused to post his ideas on the forum rather than referring to pdfs. But the little he did post seemed to be gobbledegook, and not just because of language issues. I am not optimistic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top