Theory of Everything

quantum_wave said:
Yeah, once the discussion stops being about the topic and becomes about the person, it is best to wait for responses that are on topic. No response to a post like that, not even one like this, can go unpunished.

I am more motivated to look at your ideas and respond with questions when the incivility becomes inappropriate. The lensing idea is not without some foundation, and the view we have of the universe on the other side of the GA is bound to be affected by the interveening eneregy density shaping the light. How much lensing, what the things we "see" really look like from the un-lensed perspective, etc. are still questions in my mind, and open to speculation. Thanks for bringing us the topic. Too bad you are prone to hyperbole and visions of scientific accomplishment, because that attitude, coupled with the religious connection tend to fuel incivility, even in a Fringe forum. Later.
Click to expand...

I've been the target of trolls since the day I started this thread, it is not easy to keep one's temper. Sorry to offend you, mate, it's been good chatting. How would you respond to people who continuously bash your work while not even reading it? It's rude and disrespectful, and I am not perfect so I can let myself bite back at times.
 
sscully said:
I've been the target of trolls since the day I started this thread, it is not easy to keep one's temper. Sorry to offend you, mate, it's been good chatting. How would you respond to people who continuously bash your work while not even reading it? It's rude and disrespectful, and I am not perfect so I can let myself bite back at times.
Click to expand...

Your hypothesis that you claim as "fact", your derision of most of mainstream cosmology, your claiming to have a validated ToE, your refusal to accept anything to the contrary, paints you as the troll.
 
sscully said:
Yeah I posted those things in post 78. ;-D https://vimeo.com/64868713
Click to expand...
That must be where I saw it, lol. From the PDF describing the video, and also as mentioned in captions to your paper's graphics, there is a technique called the Wiener Filter reconstruction:

From the PDF: "The observed distribution of galaxies in redshift space, the observed radial peculiar velocities of the small fraction of galaxies with accurately known distances, the in- ferred three-dimensional motions of all the galaxies from a Wiener Filter reconstruction, and the inferred density distribution from these motions. The details regarding all these steps are discussed in other publications. Our purpose here is to highlight the usefulness – the importance – of visual representations as an arm of this re- search enterprise."

Can you explain what a Wiener Filter reconstruction is?
 
sscully said:
I've been the target of trolls since the day I started this thread, it is not easy to keep one's temper. Sorry to offend you, mate, it's been good chatting. How would you respond to people who continuously bash your work while not even reading it? It's rude and disrespectful, and I am not perfect so I can let myself bite back at times.
Click to expand...

Your scientific illiterate nonsense is disrespectful. You made this nonsense up, without any respect for the real science, so you can pretend you actually have something meaningful to say on the subject of cosmology. Now you're crying foul and whining about trolls.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top