This is not a coincidence. The worst attacks carried out in five different countries all had the same configuration of Mars and the lunar node. The US, the UK, Norway, France, and Israel. Denying it at this point is willful ignorance
https://www.academia.edu/127260842
There is no way anyone can read through this and still remain skeptical of Mars influence. How can the worst atrocities carried out in five different countries have the same exact alignment of Mars being close to the lunar node, within 1 or 2 degrees
In 2025, this close alignment occurs the week of July 20th
Anthony of Boston: something to be wary of: given a large enough dataset it is possible to find an arbitrarily large set of events that appear to line up.
It is not enough to show that there are a bunch of such events. You have an obligation to show that
- they are statistically significant enough to rise above the background noise of the data, and that
- there is at least a marginally plausible connection between cause and effect.
In light of that, I have some questions. Notice I am not criticizing you or doubting you; I am simply asking to understand your selection criteria and method of analysis:
Selection Criteria: How did you pick
these five specific events? Out of all the violence in the world, why these five? Body count? Something else?
Geographical Scope: Have you included
all countries in the survey? Just these five?
Time Scope: Why the cutoff at 2001? Does the connection not hold before that? Do you have any thoughts about why this phenomenon would only make itself known as of 2001? What happens if you move that date back a few years or decades? Does the phenomenon disappear?
Selection Threshold: Do these five events rise above
all others in the 22 years from 2001 to 2023 that your dataset spans? There are
no other events in the world that meet or exceed your criteria for inclusion?
Pattern: The events are separated by, respectively 46mo, 72mo, 52mo, 95mo (In days: 1395, 2206, 3781, 2885). Is there any pattern there? Should there be? What about all the Lunar Nodes / Mars alignments in between those five events?
Selection bias?: You correlate these incidents with Mars being near a Lunar node. How many total lunar nodes occurred during the 22 year study period (two per month, or approximately
572)? How many times did Mars line up with those 572 node events? How many of those events did
not correlate with a significant Earthly cataclysm? Did you calculate that?
More selection threshold: What is the significance of "within one to two degrees" of a Lunar Node? The Moon's orbit is tilted about 5 degrees from the Earth's equator (for a total of 10 degrees), Any time it is within 2 degrees of the median you consider significant. That's
40% of its entire range. Is that really significant? I mean, it's only 10% away from being a 50/50 shot.
Here, imagine I take a 10" wide piece of paper and draw a track on it that's 4" wide (2" to each side of centre). I drip a couple of drops of water on it and consider any event where it falls within the track (
which it will do randomly 40% of the time) to be significant to my study. I might do it for five minute and get nothing noteworthy, but
in the last 22 seconds of my test five of those drops land in what I decide (afterward) is my the zone of significance - I write an article about it. Does that make sense?
Mechanism: Finally, what mechanism do you propose for causation?
A long time ago, in the annals of interweb history, someone mapped
Global Temperature versus Number of Pirates, and it turned out there was a strong correlative trend. Sometimes correlation does not mean causation. Sometimes, even long-term patterns can be coincidence. Can you explain why your hypothesis is not similarly subject to a lack of a plausible causitive link?
