Doug Coulter
Registered Member
I'm self taught to the extent possible, but in real life, we all stand on the shoulders of others, some giants. I have some formal schooling, but tended to "skip out" - I skipped two years of HS to take a scholarship to Uni, then skipped out of there to take a 6 fig job when I figured out I'd already learned what I was going to, there. I was lucky to have been mentored by a series of the very best people in several fields, I don't mean to boast. Then, 6 figs was big money - "hey hey, take the money and run" seemed like a good idea at the time.
I do self-funded fusion research, in my case a coherent colliding recirculating/rebunching beam device, with focus and bunching (that's the RF). It's a bit more complex than your average accelerator thing, as we have multiple charge mass ratios involved (and even different sign charges - but it's a far from neutral plasma with charge-exchange going on as well). We've moved this particular branch of the field ahead around 9 powers of 10 in about 4 years. There are 3 to go till we overcome the losses inherent in making steam and electricity from that. Could be worse, it's a lot less daunting than when we started at 10e-12 away (I do have a partner who finds cool equipment for me for pennies on the buck, we lack for nothing but time and effort).
As far as I can find out, our "Q", which in this field, means "energy out over energy in" is the highest in the entire biz, measured honestly (none of this "we got more fusion energy than was absorbed by the fuel from the laser" baloney that ignores tons of other energy inputs and losses), due to a breakthrough we made awhile back that nearly killed me due to excess exposure to the resulting neutron flux.
My counters all quit counting, and rather than just turn the thing off - not realizing they'd stopped due to pulse pileup when there was simply too much radiation for them to count (in other words, they just all counted one time and got stuck "true" - they didn't stop because it wasn't working, they stopped because it was working too well for their speed of counting limits), fiddled with the thing for 20-30 seconds, and was rad-sick for about 8 weeks, nasty.
I was hoping for a factor of 5, and that usually means I get 2, but actually got around 2800...oops. I found a space-charge taken into account version of the Mathieu equation, it seems, in my gear, and the chances I hit the peak in the resonance by accident are nil. I'm psyched! (link above is to the current main use of that math, not quite what I'm doing here - this math is normally used for cases where no inter-particle Coulomb force need be taken into account.)
Since, I've been working on remote controlling the thing, since even with multiple bottle jacks under the floor, I can barely hold up the shielding I already have, and it's way not-enough. I should be up and running with the new system pretty soon, but am planning to build an extension on a nearby building to put the operator position in - good ol inverse square law and air should do the trick so I don't die just as I succeed. This itself is a little daunting, as it involves tuning stuff that is over 50kv off ground on top of the RF. But only a little.
I suspect this is the wrong thread to discuss that, though...we old farts have to be careful not to thread-jack...the kids might not be able to follow the fast context switching/cognitive dissonance
I also have my own sci/tech forums for this one.
On the original topic, though, on further thought, as a candidate for "live forever" information, how about fuse-type burned PROMs of old tech? Or even the old diode matrix thing we used to use, on fiberglass PCBs? Lots of atoms/bit, low chance of any diffusion or reaction type failure (incredibly high activation energy barrier), and in the case of the diodes - even if they fail - or are even fossilized, you still have the pattern. I think it boils down to some function of atoms per bit in the end, and reliable implies large.
I do self-funded fusion research, in my case a coherent colliding recirculating/rebunching beam device, with focus and bunching (that's the RF). It's a bit more complex than your average accelerator thing, as we have multiple charge mass ratios involved (and even different sign charges - but it's a far from neutral plasma with charge-exchange going on as well). We've moved this particular branch of the field ahead around 9 powers of 10 in about 4 years. There are 3 to go till we overcome the losses inherent in making steam and electricity from that. Could be worse, it's a lot less daunting than when we started at 10e-12 away (I do have a partner who finds cool equipment for me for pennies on the buck, we lack for nothing but time and effort).
As far as I can find out, our "Q", which in this field, means "energy out over energy in" is the highest in the entire biz, measured honestly (none of this "we got more fusion energy than was absorbed by the fuel from the laser" baloney that ignores tons of other energy inputs and losses), due to a breakthrough we made awhile back that nearly killed me due to excess exposure to the resulting neutron flux.
My counters all quit counting, and rather than just turn the thing off - not realizing they'd stopped due to pulse pileup when there was simply too much radiation for them to count (in other words, they just all counted one time and got stuck "true" - they didn't stop because it wasn't working, they stopped because it was working too well for their speed of counting limits), fiddled with the thing for 20-30 seconds, and was rad-sick for about 8 weeks, nasty.
I was hoping for a factor of 5, and that usually means I get 2, but actually got around 2800...oops. I found a space-charge taken into account version of the Mathieu equation, it seems, in my gear, and the chances I hit the peak in the resonance by accident are nil. I'm psyched! (link above is to the current main use of that math, not quite what I'm doing here - this math is normally used for cases where no inter-particle Coulomb force need be taken into account.)
Since, I've been working on remote controlling the thing, since even with multiple bottle jacks under the floor, I can barely hold up the shielding I already have, and it's way not-enough. I should be up and running with the new system pretty soon, but am planning to build an extension on a nearby building to put the operator position in - good ol inverse square law and air should do the trick so I don't die just as I succeed. This itself is a little daunting, as it involves tuning stuff that is over 50kv off ground on top of the RF. But only a little.
I suspect this is the wrong thread to discuss that, though...we old farts have to be careful not to thread-jack...the kids might not be able to follow the fast context switching/cognitive dissonance

On the original topic, though, on further thought, as a candidate for "live forever" information, how about fuse-type burned PROMs of old tech? Or even the old diode matrix thing we used to use, on fiberglass PCBs? Lots of atoms/bit, low chance of any diffusion or reaction type failure (incredibly high activation energy barrier), and in the case of the diodes - even if they fail - or are even fossilized, you still have the pattern. I think it boils down to some function of atoms per bit in the end, and reliable implies large.