That doesn't rule out the possibility of quantisation at very small time scales, which we haven't/can't observe.
I mean not just using smaller intervals, but
if there is a kind of stop and go motion through spacetime would that not imply acceleration, deceleration, tremendous energy expenditures given the mass involved ?
Why cycloid? Why not something like a rolling wheel? And touching what? I get it that this is an analogy, but what is rotating in your analogy, and what is stationary, and how do you know it's a cycloid?
There is mention of all the "rolling wheels " in the universe, the model. from quarks with "spin" to rotating galaxies. "orbiting "electrons even? being in close touch, with
"time" as understood as a fundamental first dimension, #1 in the "ALMA" thread. time is stationary, it is the road that the wheel rolls on / in.
Whenever you have wheeling you can perceive a cycloid (see the topic "Velocities cancel. Saturn's equator features trace a prolate cycloidal motion with respect to the sun, the stationary planetary field. -- at noon. ) so. It is proposed here, that there is a smooth,
no slip connection between rotating matter and the stationary timespace#1 that matter moves through, into the future. (sorry to bridge topics here)
You seem to have a bunch of separate ideas there. Perhaps try to flesh it out, one idea at a time.
indeed, and I need all the help I can get. questions do that. thank you.
If time is the road, what is the wheel?
Time imho, is the intangible realm that must have existed to accommodate energy, that is uncreated, indestructible. dubbed as:
one dimensional, omni dimensional timespace, or energytime. so, "time is not flat, but all embracing, The wheel or wheels (the universe is an all wheel drive) is matter moving through time,
touching "time" frictionlessly as at the cusp or cusps of a cycloid.
P.S. In a wheel, all the points on the rim become the
zero contact cusp in succession, in an omni- directional medium like "time" (or "unidirectional"), the model would suggest zero contact all the time. all around.
I still don't understand the analogy. Please explain. What do you mean by "our movement" in this context? And how does that relate to rotation, in the analogy?
Sorry, I often carelessly personalize the concept of matter like "
we all were in the Big Bang" , (meaning as energy and matter, subject to laws). To relate all this together is the concept that hopefully might crystallize.
The symbolism could be seeing energy (like light) as a rotating wave, or all spins in the universe as "timed" therefore connected to time, perhaps
at some level, there is no existence without "rotation" rolling through "time" like a cycloid.
Time will tell, hopefully