No, we're talking about "public services" provided by government, without regard to "cost" which is borne by the public to begin with. "Underuse" is of no importance.
And since every mailbox is also a collection box, that's like saying every business has two wheelchair ramps and we're going to remove the one that's used less. Doesn't affect access at all.
You think so, huh?
First: The mailman only stops for delivery and/or pick up. They do not automatically stop at every house.
Second: You'd rather add an extra 20 seconds to open the mailbox and collect outgoing mail from say 120 private mailboxes than a single 60 second collection of 120 pieces of mail from a single public collection box. Do the math.
First: Why would a postal carrier stop at a house that doesn't have any incoming or outgoing mail? Again, you don't seem to be making any point at all.
Second: It's not an either/or situation. All mailboxes are already collection boxes. Collection boxes only exist for convenience, where traffic and volume warrant their use. Low volume does not, because that means people in the area are simply using mailboxes instead. And routes go by every mailbox anyway, whether they are getting or receiving any mail that day. And guess what, if nothing else, there is always a local post office. Again, you have no point.
i just read in the news ...
calling military personal who have died in the field
"Looser's" & "Sucker's"
im almost speechless(& you know that takes a lot)
This coming from the greatest "Commander in Chief", ever !!! ................
No, it's coming from anonymous, and thus unverifiable, sources. Why would former officials not go on record? It's not like they would lose their jobs.
Trump had the unique advantage of taking office in the midst of a great recovery from the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression
Too bad you couldn't manage to read that the Trump chart "REFLECTS SUBSTANTIAL EFFECTS OF THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY".
And if you think the economic gains were largely Obama's doing, would you equally say the poor race relations were also his doing, seeing as Ferguson, Baltimore, etc. racial riots began on his watch?
Yes, like people who say; "you're not gonna force me to buy health insurance", but when they need to go to the hospital they will stick the Hospital for the bill and the tax payer for the Health Care expense.
No, conservatives are all for relatively cheap catastrophic health insurance, that would cover emergency care, which is the kind people skip out on paying.
For the bills that go unpaid, hospitals can try to compensate by charging other patients more. But that doesn’t happen as much as many people – including policymakers -- think.
...
The majority of hospitals are non-profits and are exempt from federal, state and local taxes if they provide a community benefit, such as charitable care. Hospitals also receive federal funding to offset some of the costs of treating the poor.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...eone-without-insurance-shows-up-er/445756001/
So your arguments about the USPS being non-profit and providing a community benefit would apply doubly to hospitals, because we're talking about saving lives here. So you're either a hypocrite or heartless.
Worst of it is that they'll be pleased to stick it to the governement that is "taxing us to death".
Think of the mind-set of this kind of public parasite.
Oh, you mean a "public parasite" like the USPS, that needs to be bailed out for billions every year? 9_9
There fore, one moment the military are the best the next they are the worst.. or one moment he loves women then the next he doesn't and so on...
The worst part is people like
Vociferous support this sort of floating moral opportunism and allow it to take positions of power.
No, I'm just not duped by anonymous sources, which have proven unreliable in the past.
4 years...??
oh don't forget his amazing performance in North Korea's and Iranian Nuke agenda...and how he has messed up all those other trade treaties you seem to wish to ignore...
not to mention how he has dis-empowered the USA voice in the UN and WHO.
so in 4 years he has managed to do the MAGA big time hey?
oh also do not forget his rather convenient long term relationship with Netanyahu and ME real estate...
The US and UN has been at a stalemate with NK for decades. It was worth at least trying other tactics.
Trump: US demands restoration of UN sanctions against Iran
The administration’s insistence on snapping back international sanctions against Iran sets the stage for a contentious dispute. It’s possible that the U.S. call will be ignored by other U.N. members — an outcome that could call into question the U.N. Security Council’s ability to enforce its own legally binding decisions.
https://apnews.com/5a480ffdf131af14e001943693ca05b8
Trump administration struggles to rally international support for new Iran sanctions
The Trump administration notified the United Nations on Thursday that the U.S. will — on its own — reinstate numerous sanctions to punish Iran after failing to rally international support to extend an arms embargo on the Islamic Republic.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...-iran-sanctions-after-failing-on-arms-embargo
That's the UN standing in the way of keeping Iran from acquiring new arms. That sounds like that would make the UN complicit in Iran becoming a nuclear power.
Trump didn't mess up any needed trade deals, and Russia and China veto power in the UN long since made it impotent. Netanyahu has likely been a factor in the Israeli, UAE, Serbia, and Kosovo peace deals, and like Trump in the US, it seems his political opponents are largely trying the same tactics. Those haven't worked out so well here. "ME real estate"?