The Theory of Inexorability

Entropy.png
 
DIMENSIONS AND COORDINATES

The term dimension is equivocal because it refers to:
- The direction in which space is projected and the direction that time follows.
- The importance or scope that an event can get.
- The magnitude that defines a physical phenomenon.

The term coordinate is univocal because it refers only to the line that serves to determine the position of a point, and (axis or plane) to which it refers.

Some mathematicians make get dimensions to 12, but there are three spatial coordinates and time coordinate is one. Note that the space is projected in three directions and time follows one direction (historical or sequential) and one way (before-after). Becoming and all time units pass sequentially.

Elvis Sibilia of America (ESA)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
THE DOUBLE ARROW OF TIME

The coordinate is the mathematical representation of a dimension. The dots in space are still. In the time coordinate the dot of the present flows continuously (becoming). An arrow indicates the sense (space) and the double arrow indicates the sense and the fluidity (time). The dots to the left of the double arrow represent the past and the dots to the right represent the future.

Space coordinate: (extension, stillness).
The observer can be at any dot of the coordinate or space.

--------------------------->
.......... length ........ sense
<--------------------------

Time coordinate: (sequential becoming, the double arrow).
The observer can only be in the present.

.......................... fluidity
----------------------->> -------------------
........ past ........ present ....... future

Sibilia
 
THE DOUBLE ARROW OF TIME

La%2Bdoble%2Bflecha%2Bdel%2Btiempo.png


An arrow indicates the sense (space) and the double arrow indicates the sense and the fluidity (time).
 
This thread "Theory of Inexorability" appears to be a transplant.

It went nowhere fast here:

http://sciencechatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=28599

And also seems to be associated with ideas appearing in a book 'A New Theory of Time-- a "Trinitarian Approach"' (1994) by Oaklander and Smith, including both Inexorability and some philosophical tract about "tenseless time". You can read most of it here:

https://books.google.com/books?id=-Wv59xyNDjsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=The New Theory of Time Oaklander and Smith&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Q1AQVfvCKcOqgwTHo4PwCQ&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=The New Theory of Time Oaklander and Smith&f=false

Why didn't you just reference this work, Sibilia? We can read too.

What, exactly, is a "Trinitarian", if you don't mind my asking?

Oh, never mind. I see:

http://www.trinitarians.org

And they study relativity also, do they? That's nice.
 
Last edited:
In many other places on the internet during the last decade or so, I have occasionally encountered religious sects that incorporate portions of Relativity Theory into the cannon of their respective faiths. Usually, this is accomplished through the deliberate omission of certain portions of the theory most actual scientists would agree are indispensable to the consistency and viability of Einstein's version. As far as I can determine, that seems to be what this is all about.

In the grey area between science and religion, consistency is not valued and any contradictions with math or other established science are not steadfastly rejected as they are in a science.

I vote to remove this thread to the Pseudoscience forum, because that is exactly what it is. It has no rightful place in Alternative Theories, nor in Physics or Math as it is not based on a science. Compared to similar such religious tomes, this one seems to have a predisposition toward using mismatched philosophical concepts which really don't quite fit into a real discussion of science.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Danshawen to investigate what I post here.

Posted by Danshawen: "This thread "Theory of Inexorability" appears to be a transplant."

I am Sunson. I left a message to you there.

I don't know the book: A New Theory of Time: a Trinitarian Approach.
I can't answer any of your question because I have never heard about that theory.

Any similarity is a coincidence.

The Philochrony is not religion, it is a SCIENCE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sibilia said:
Thanks Danshawen to investigate what I post here.

Posted by Danshawen: "This thread "Theory of Inexorability" appears to be a transplant."

I am Sunson. I left a message to you there.

I don't know the book: A New Theory of Time: a Trinitarian Approach.
I can't answer any of your question because I have never heard about that theory.

Any similarity is a coincidence.

The Philochrony is not religion, it is a SCIENCE.
Click to expand...
Google doesn't seem to agree. It's nice that Philochronists love time. I collect timepieces myself. Don't we all love time, as in MORE time to do stuff? Philosophy is not science either.

Any belief system that is not changeable when new and better theories replace old ones because they explain more is disqualified as a science. If philochrony is a science, how has it changed since the days of ancient Greece?

Autodynamics is another example of a relativity copycat that is pseudoscience, and has the same issues with making any actual scientific progress, or explaining anything better than the original theory of relativity. If you don't know what this is, look up David de Hilster on the Encyclopedia of American Loons.

Real science is extensible; you can build new knowledge on it. Pseudoscience is not, or at least, not for very long before ideas begin to break down into nonsense.
 
Daecon said:
How does it follow the scientific method of investigation and logical reasoning?
Click to expand...

THE PHILOCHRON TABLE

The relational analogical reasoning is the method used by the Philochrony for its conclusions.
The Philochrony leave from the following relations of concepts of Physics:

PROPERTY ....... QUANTITY ....... MAGNITUDE
space .................... extension ............ length
matter .................. mass ................... weight
becoming ............. duration .............. time

At the beginning of the Philochrony (March 13, 2009) I asked myself what concepts would integrate the line corresponding to the time and in what order. Note that space and time are not in the same column. The Philochrony considers time as an intangible magnitude and becoming as tangible property. Duration is the continuity of things in reality.

The Philochrony criticizes the Theory of Relativity based on the interpretation of their own graphs.
 
Sibilia said:
THE PHILOCHRON TABLE

The relational analogical reasoning is the method used by the Philochrony for its conclusions.
The Philochrony leave from the following relations of concepts of Physics:

PROPERTY ....... QUANTITY ....... MAGNITUDE
space .................... extension ............ length
matter .................. mass ................... weight
becoming ............. duration .............. time

At the beginning of the Philochrony (March 13, 2009) I asked myself what concepts would integrate the line corresponding to the time and in what order. Note that space and time are not in the same column. The Philochrony considers time as an intangible magnitude and becoming as tangible property. Duration is the continuity of things in reality.

The Philochrony criticizes the Theory of Relativity based on the interpretation of their own graphs.
Click to expand...
OK, so what, exactly, do the columns represent? By that I mean, what is special about "Property", "Quantity", "Magnitude", as opposed to something like, "Day of the week" "Number of coconuts" and "Nutmeg"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top