The REAL 4th Hed's sciforums awards

T

thefountainhed

Fully Realized
Valued Senior Member
The REAL 4th Hed’s sciforums awards

I had to satisfy my thirst for the vitriolic and since Gendanken figured out the game and goofyfish closed the thread, I suppose it’s time to create the real awards thread that recognizes the few posters that have put forth thoughtful and insightful posts. I would still like to thank spuriousmonkey and Dr. Lounatic for always being there to help satisfy this thirst. The same of course goes to gendanken.

The level of posts on the forum has not increased or decreased in intelligence or insight as this is not a quantifiable measure: all members have differing preferences and expectations. Nevertheless one can still put forth criteria that attempt to quantify the few whose posts have held a certain standard of quality. The 4th awards thread should have been three months ago but I was far too busy to engage in what is both inane and necessary.

Thus, without further ado:

Best Poster—As I cannot read every posts and am quite frankly unwilling to read most posts, I simply classify by firstly limiting post count in the past 3-4 months to 70-100 or more. I also do not frequent the pseudosciene or the cesspool subforums and so the best posters there can kiss my proverbial black ass.

Criteria:
1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).
2. Provides original and enlightening perspectives otherwise missed by the masses.
3. Presents a valid viewpoint regardless of backlash
4. Language
5. Posts within the past 3 months (100+)


Nominees with mini summary as to talents

1. Fraggle Rocker--- an amiable poster whose wisdom shows through his posts
2. Tiassa --- Uncannily good with this language and adept submerging self into topics
3. Raithere --- Intelligent poster able to present ideas into very erudite posts
4. gendanken — often abusive and aggressive in language but nevertheless creatibe in thought and language.
5. James R --- logical and precise presents thoughts only when he has something to offer
6. undecided/nico --- Very prolific but nevertheless knowledgeable in the piss hole subforums Politics and World Evemts
7. RosaMagika ---- Relatively new poster who is both prolific and mostly insightful in presenting a different taste on issues
8. Invert Nexus —Look above
9. river-mind --- My favourite poster, very intelligent and creative
10. Jenyar--- Knowledgeable in theology and open-minded in his/her presentation


Most Resourceful Poster

Most Resourceful posters
Definition: Main Entry: re·source·ful
Pronunciation: ri-'sOrs-f&l, -'sors-, -'zOrs-, -'zors-
Function: adjective
Date: 1851
: able to meet situations : capable of devising ways and means
- re·source·ful·ly /-f&-lE/ adverb
- re·source·ful·ness noun

Usage/Criteria
Describes the individual best adept at providing links to support his/her stance, most ingenuous, most clever, provides insightful views, etc

1. Dr. Lounatic
2. anu
3. gendanken
4. river-wind
5. MacM
6. Fraggle Rocker
7. Quantum Quack
8. seargentlard
9. John Connellan
10. Nasor

So that’s it. Only two categories this time, for the other categories I previously provided are far too inane and I am far too lazy to create them anyway,
 
Last edited:
thefountainhed said:
I would still like to thank spuriousmonkey and Dr. Lounatic for always being there to help satisfy this thirst. The same of course goes to gendanken.
Click to expand...

No problem, I was happy to help you out.
 
WOW. I see that there are four "awards" threads circulating. And whilst I commend you all for putting your invaluable time into something that is a blatant ripoff of the original and HONOURABLE hed's awards, we could perhaps start a union and give every lowlife attempting to equate or elevate above the hed some say-- no matter how uneducated.

This is the awards thread. The nominations are researched. That is all.
 
I hate to bust you bubble but "your" idea is hardly original or honourable, its a ripoff from people past, your where how ever first here as far as i know.
But everbody is entitled make there own, adding there own twist and turns, strangly all the other 3 seems better then yours :)

btw: We reach 130 post in the other thread before the administration got bored, i bet they where just waiting for an excuse to close it.... just needed to say that :)
 
If you can't speak to your peers with a little more decorum I shall be forced to remove your thread from the "awards thread, award thread". Just think of all the possible fame and accolades you will be missing out on if that happens!
 
thefountainhed said:
WOW. I see that there are four "awards" threads circulating. And whilst I commend you all for putting your invaluable time into something that is a blatant ripoff of the original and HONOURABLE hed's awards.
Click to expand...

Immitation is the best form of flattery. ;)
 
Kunax said:
I hate to bust you bubble but "your" idea is hardly original or honourable, its a ripoff from people past, your where how ever first here as far as i know.
Click to expand...
Well the art of recognition is simply perfected by claiming credit. The first to claim credit receives it. I claim that since the original awards thread was perhaps a year ago, I am the originator. And the reasons were to some extent honourable as I sought to simply list those I thought were the better posters.

But everbody is entitled make there own, adding there own twist and turns, strangly all the other 3 seems better then yours :)
Click to expand...
Did they nominate you?

btw: We reach 130 post in the other thread before the administration got bored, i bet they where just waiting for an excuse to close it.... just needed to say that :)
Click to expand...
I shall make an effort to keep this one very quiet.


If you can't speak to your peers with a little more decorum I shall be forced to remove your thread from the "awards thread, award thread". Just think of all the possible fame and accolades you will be missing out on if that happens!
Click to expand...
*shrug*
 
Why did spookz delete his post, I was about to reply to it.

buffys is a good poster, unfortunately the places are very limited.

Immitation is the best form of flattery
Click to expand...
Yea, that or the best way to drag an idea into shit. But I get your point. What I really outta do is create an honourary seargentlard award.
 
So you want an example of an ingeneous or clever posting from DR Lou Natic that warrants his inclusion amongst the most resourceful nominees?

Here:

But I'm not allowed to kill the guy in the wheelchair, thats the problem. Thats the glitch in the system. This damn shit called law fucks up the natural balance. Within our own species survival of the species should be occuring. Its not supposed to be species vs species. No other species is ganging up to take on the world. The species are in harmony with eachother. Within a species should be conflict making sure only the best individuals survive.
Without the species as a whole nurturing these gimps they'd be fucked. If their family could look after them while my family, some other family a bear and 4 lions were all out for the gimp's head then more power to them, but I doubt they could protect him from that onsluaght. Which means he shouldn't be alive.
His family didn't invent wheelchairs or guns. It isn't fair that we as a species have joined forces, ofcourse we're going to outcompete the other animals, they're busy competing with members of their own respective species. We aren't "so far ahead" of any species alive today. We all evolved together. What we are is soft, we stopped behaving the way the animal we are is supposed to behave, and became a burden on the biosphere as a result.
Click to expand...

Go ahead and diissect it.
 
Last edited:
But I'm not allowed to kill the guy in the wheelchair, thats the problem.

the guy in the wheelchair, you maggot, is hawking. he is worth a million of your miserable and pathetic existence

Thats the glitch in the system.

no, sorry, in your brain. kapeesh? the glitch in your brain!

This damn shit called law fucks up the natural balance.

natural balance? cliched nonsense is what that is. we simply do not possess the temporal viewpoint to understand what that means.

Within our own species survival of the species should be occuring.

why?

Its not supposed to be species vs species.

why?

No other species is ganging up to take on the world.

non sequiter

The species are in harmony with eachother

hehe

Within a species should be conflict making sure only the best individuals survive.

random neurons firing haphazardly

Without the species as a whole nurturing these gimps they'd be fucked.

1+1=2

If their family could look after them while my family, some other family a bear and 4 lions were all out for the gimp's head then more power to them, but I doubt they could protect him from that onsluaght. Which means he shouldn't be alive.

jeez. stone age? modern age?

His family didn't invent wheelchairs or guns.

who the fuck is "he"? what if they did?

It isn't fair that we as a species have joined forces, ofcourse we're going to outcompete the other animals, they're busy competing with members of their own respective species.

so ahh humans are now united? pick up the goddamn newspapers and read

We aren't "so far ahead" of any species alive today. We all evolved together. What we are is soft, we stopped behaving the way the animal we are is supposed to behave, and became a burden on the biosphere as a result.

garbage

dr lou cannot think straight. halfassed and unsupported assertions/idiotic generalizations/whatnot is what i see. there are more than adequate resources to cater to all of humanity..sick or otherwise. all that is required is the proper management and utilization of said shit. things are only gonna get better.

if you require an expansion of the above, ask. i will bury you in citations. i will show you why anu is the most resourceful fuck in all of history!
 
LMAO! Ah, yes I have truly missed your posts. Give me some time to respond. Besides, realize resourceful is not necessarily intelligent or logical-- at least not in use in these awards-- but rather "links to support his/her stance, most ingenuous, most clever, provides insightful views, etc " + ingenius. Dr Lou Natic is clever and ingenius and I suspect maddening with a reason.
 
the guy in the wheelchair, you maggot, is hawking. he is worth a million of your miserable and pathetic existence
Click to expand...
Moron, this is clearly a value statement in response to another value statement. Within the contexst of his argument, strength is clearly the sperseding value. In order words, Hawking wouldn't survive in the bloody jungle, no matter how intelligent he is.

natural balance? cliched nonsense is what that is. we simply do not possess the temporal viewpoint to understand what that means.
Perhaps we truly have not existed long enough to understand what said "cliche" means holistically, but in the now, one can make such a statement and use as support, environments devoid of excessive influence by man. You cannot support yours with like evidence.

garbage
Click to expand...
I concur with that respond to cited statement. However, you are missing the point within the context of his entire argument: strength.

dr lou cannot think straight. halfassed and unsupported assertions/idiotic generalizations/whatnot is what i see. there are more than adequate resources to cater to all of humanity..sick or otherwise. all that is required is the proper management and utilization of said shit. things are only gonna get better.
Click to expand...
Dr Lou thinks differently and supports his arguments with likewise aberrant sources-- this is resourceful. I think within his argument it is irrelevant that there are more than enough resources to cater to mankind. His issue as far as I see it, is that a handicapped man using a firearm to kill a deer for instance is despicable. It is as such because said handicapped fuck is probably exercising an insecurity in his own physical ineptitude by harming this animal, and said individual would be useless without other humans to feed off on.

i will show you why anu is the most resourceful fuck in all of history!
Click to expand...
Yes you are resourceful, but within the context of the argument I call call your statement an example of "halfassed and unsupported assertions/idiotic generalizations/whatnot".
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
In order words, Hawking wouldn't survive in the bloody jungle, no matter how intelligent he is.

why the fuck not? inventing unrealistic fantasies in order to support a point does not say much about one's intellect

look, it is true that at one time, the unfit were a liabilty. in these times, they are not. hawking is rich enough to have several gunga dins armed to the frikkin teeth by his side in the jungle

that is reality! not some magical transportation of the infirm into a lion's den during the neolithic period
the weak will also stay the fuck out of the jungle. they will snipe the bear from the safety of their landrover.

]some other family a bear and 4 lions were all out for the gimp's head (lou)

heh, do you think you would prevail?

understand this, maggots! the doctor parades some mythical period in earth's history as idyllic. that has been a constant refrain of his. it is unsupported crap. it is based on emotion and as such has no goddamned place in a science forum

His issue as far as I see it, is that a handicapped man using a firearm to kill a deer for instance is despicable.

provide context in form of a link if you want to be fair to the maggot. as for your interpretation of his intent.... it is much worse than i thought.

dr lou! nobody gives a rats about your sensibilities. i recommend the preteen chatroom over at aol if your feelings are to be the point of discussion.

i'll tell you what, hed, you have actually done the maggot a disservice. he is slightly more capable than that bit of nonsense you quoted.

however, the guy is a fake. lou was fairly respectable when he first got here. now he simply gets as outrageous as possible. it aint real

Dr Lou Natic said:
em0912, you're spot on.
I've been making that argument here for a while, you'll find they won't budge. This is the irrational PC capital of the internet :rolleyes:

Oh and obviously males are smarter. What the? why is there a debate raging here? Do any of you have any grasp on history? Jesus h fuck, its not a matter of opinion.
This girl might be smarter than that guy, but which gender is smarter? It's a no brainer.
We all know it to, thats what upsets me about political correctness, its like everyone's agreeing with eachother on the lies they told themselves.
Click to expand...

typical garbage. never mind cultural expectations/educational biases/child rearing/whatnot. you have another unsupported and moronic assertion.

must go kick dog now. bye!
 
thefountainhed said:
It is as such because said handicapped fuck is probably exercising an insecurity in his own physical ineptitude by harming this animal, and said individual would be useless without other humans to feed off on.
Click to expand...

this shit is being pulled out of thin air!
this fuckers rap will last as long as he remains healthy. watch the politics change as disease and old age approaches.
 
kasi,
you know i used that post because I knew it would hit home, yes? If you appreciate that this good. Still, you can do better than you are doing now. I will respond later.
 
however, the guy is a fake. lou was fairly respectable when he first got here. now he simply gets as outrageous as possible. it aint real
Click to expand...
Yes, but it is all on purpose. And I think it is clever to a good extent, considering the view points held here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top