Just surprised that with all the technology available, there is no accurate way to ensure that you're not targeting troops on the same side.
Dear Baron, Apparently they had there ornage flags showing which was meant to show they were british armour, ...
Sam, don't forget that, even with all of the technology in the world, there are still humans involved. With humans involved, one man, say thinking about his girlfriend instead of his job, could do a lot of damage. Having experience in such matters, it doesn't surprise me at all.
Baron Max
having been in combat, you can also stand behind the fact that you dont shoot if you dont know who or what you are shooting at, isnt that right, buffalo?
fog of war ring a bell?
So how difficult is it to tell from the cockpit?
Hey, Zak, what does a little orange flag look like from a distance of 2.5 miles? And worse, against the backdrop of a multi-colored groundscape?
Go outside and take a look around, Zak. See what you can see at 2.5 miles.
Baron Max
Hey, Zak, what does a little orange flag look like from a distance of 2.5 miles? And worse, against the backdrop of a multi-colored groundscape?
Go outside and take a look around, Zak. See what you can see at 2.5 miles.
Baron Max
Its kind of strange how they can not identify british armour but the israeli air force can identify from at least 2.5miles up whether a hizbollah ressistance fighter is in civilian clothing or not!!
What do children and civilians look like at that altitude, Baron?
Little, tiny ants ...or less if they ain't movin'. But being a scientist, as you claim, you couldn't work that out for yourself??? If they can barely see a big vehicle, can barely tell what it is, you somehow can't figure out what humans would look like from the same distance?????? Scientist, huh?? Yeah, right!
But no civilians were killed in this instance, so why bring it up? Or are you still trying to turn this thread into another "Hate America" thread??? Sure you don't also want to do what Zak does ....turn it into a "Hate Israel" thread, too?
Baron Max
Gerrard also criticised the pilot for shooting when there were civilians so close to the tanks.
"There was a boy of about 12 years old. He was no more than 20 metres (yards) away when the Yank opened up. There were all these civilians around."
having been in combat, you can also stand behind the fact that you dont shoot if you dont know who or what you are shooting at, ...?
So, tell me, what would you do; You and your squad start taking enemy fire from the trees and bushes, or from some buildings. The enemy is hidden, you can't see them, can't know that maybe there are some civilians in the buildings.
Would you allow the enemy to keep firing at your squad without returning fire ...just to keep them from shooting at you? You'd wait until you actually saw and identified the shooters? And you wouldn't fire if you thought that maybe, just maybe, there were civilians in the buildings?
Baron Max
PS - Didn't read your link.