according to nature science is neutral on the concept of god.The scientific method proceeds on the basis of a naturalistic mechanism behind observed phenomena and data. If there are gaps in scientific knowledge or science cannot explain something (which is certainly true of our understanding of abiogenesis), science does not throw its hands up and declare that ‘it must have been God’. If you want to speculate on the role of God or a ‘creator’ then you are no longer being scientific and I will move the thread to a non-science forum. (Note: depending on the nature of the conversation, this may be the Cesspool where threads are automatically locked.)
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html
for you, or anyone else, to say someone is wrong you will have to prove you are right.
so far this proof hasn't been forthcoming. lot's of ideas though.
the only thing science knows about the subject is life comes from life.