What a load of sanctimonious hypocritical crap......putting yourslef at higher pedestal .....Lets see where you are in the argument.
Aid has been absent for a while, so maybe he is not quite aware yet, that Danshawen and Schemelzer are total genuises when compared to your bullshit and lack of BH cosmological knowledge.1. You wrongly persisted that direction plays no role in Time Dilation I gave you the link which details the transformation with arbitrary direction motion.
2. You raised doubts over the 'standard of length' as measured bringing in time
3. You talk of ephemeral BH.....wow, you failed to recognise once inside EH, then the only way for BH to vanish is, Hawking Radiation which has time frame as high as you can imagine.
4. You came to know only yesterday, that BHs have no direct evidence? Its no sin, but where does it put you with such lengthy arguments on the subject.
5. On Laura paper, you talk of rebounce due to Nuclear Strong Force, while she talks of nothing like that. Her rebounce factor is due to Backreacting negative Hawking radiation.
You declared few as cranks but shared no knowledge.
I mean you did not even know that according to GR, when the Schwarzchild radius is reached, further collapse is compulsory...You refused to accept that we are reasonably allowed to invoke properties such as spin inside a Kerr metric BH, based on the observation of the frame dragging in the ergosphere.......You could not comprehend how gravity overcomes all forces including the strong nuclear inside a BH....you were ignorant of the validity of all FoR's, and all that just from the top of my head.