You defined it yourself in post # 437.
You are just misinterpreting the definition.
--A tree has a fractal pattern , but a fractal pattern is not a tree--
Define Fractals to you , never mind me or any body else .
You defined it yourself in post # 437.
You are just misinterpreting the definition.
--A tree has a fractal pattern , but a fractal pattern is not a tree--
Can you send me a physical fractal? I'd love to have one. I'd take good care of it!
How do they proliferate? Fractal sex?
And especially sinceNow in view of this, and that this is the title of this thread, I simply don't think that we should have to sit here and listen to a tedious OFF TOPIC discussion of
And especially since he's making it up as he goes along.
Far more likely been making stuff up for far more longer[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Really? Notice that this diagram says "copyright George Hammond 1998".
View attachment 4658
That's 24 years ago! That's a hell of a long time to allegedly be "making stuff up" for chlrissakes, far more likely in my opinion that it is a bona fide case of original scientific discovery!
George
OK. a fractal pattern is a naturally forming self-similar pattern that repeats in a mathematical manner.Define Fractals to you , never mind me or any body else .
For a long time people have been looking for a fully quantised theory of gravity. Causal dynamical triangulations (CDT) is one of the candidates to fulfill that role. It is a non-perturbative theory that already has promising results in dimensions d = 2, d = 3 and especially in d = 4.[1, 2]
a)Each triangulation represents a different way of building up discrete spacetimes with small building blocks of Minkowski space. With these building blocks, expression 2 can be seen as a summation over all universes. In 2 + 1 dimensions1 these building blocks are tetrahedra, see figure 1.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] These forms have multiple great benefits, but mostly they are simple to use
A Platonic solid is a convex regular polyhedron in three-dimensional Euclidean space. Being a regular polyhedron means that the faces are congruent (identical in shape and size) regular polygons (all angles congruent and all edges congruent), and the same number of faces meet at each vertex
Another virtue of regularity is that the Platonic solids all possess three concentric spheres: the circumscribed sphere which passes through all the vertices, the midsphere which is tangent to each edge at the midpoint of the edge, and face centers respectively.
This is: The volume is computed as F times the volume of the pyramid whose base is a regular p-gon and whose height is the inradius r.
www.liquisearch.com/platonic_solid/geometric_properties/radii_area_and_volumeThe following table lists the various radii of the Platonic solids together with their surface area and volume. The overall size is fixed by taking the edge length, a, to be equal to 2.
Far more likely been making stuff up for far more longer
this material has been published in the PEER REVIEWED LITERATURE, by me in New Ideas in Psychology a globally distributed prominent academic journal published by the world's largest scientific publisher Elsevier Scientific Ltd in 1994. They do not publish "made up stuff". And here are some of the illustrations contained in that "peer reviewed" publication
this paper was peer-reviewed by 4 PhD's
I don't understand all the mathematics, but I can certainly agree that humans are formed in a mathematical pattern and your descriptive illustrations may well be mathematically correct.[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Really? Notice that this diagram says "copyright George Hammond 1998".
View attachment 4658
That's 24 years ago! That's a hell of a long time to allegedly be "making stuff up" for chlrissakes, far more likely in my opinion that it is a bona fide case of original scientific discovery!
George
Elsevier Scientific Ltd are a doggy money making mob set up to publish behind paywalls copyright material they have no permission to do so
Illustrations showing aspects of made up stuff are made up to show made up stuff
How many of those peers who reviewed your paper AGREE with your findings?
I don't understand all the mathematics, but I can certainly agree that humans are formed in a mathematical pattern and your descriptive illustrations may well be mathematically correct.
"Write4u" said:After all, Leonardo Da Vinci created this illustration.
However, that does not prove mathematics are human.
"Write4u" said:So, is it possible that even as your mathematics are correct, it does not necessarily prove anything other than that humans are atoms and molecules arranged in mathematical patterns and attaching an extra-ordinary meaning is perhaps wishful thinking, even as the mathematics are correct?
Is this not a similar argument used by theists proposing "intelligent design"?
Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe. – Your outlandish opinion of the world's largest scientific publisher (Elsevier Scientific Ltd.), considering you have no academic scientific credentials and no peer published scientific record – – is absolutely meaningless and of no significance to anyone
The world's most prestigious scientific publisher DOES NOT "publish made up stuff" – your opinion is nothing but guttersniping harassment.
And what has been the follow up from the publication, in 1994 - nearly 30 years agoMy 1994 paper was UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED for publication by all 4 reviewers based on scientific MERIT ONLY. Naturally It was published entirely free of charge based on its obviously tremendous value to Science
1 + 1 = 2 is proof of God? Mathematics is proof of God? Is that not what you are claiming.... That is a hard science rigorous scientific proof of God. We don't have to listen to "intelligent design", or "mathematical universes" or any other lukewarm milktoast theories of everything – – the world's first scientific proof of God has been discovered, signed, sealed, and delivered!
Does a brain need legs? What does any of this have to do with the existence of an Abrahamic God?[GE Hammond MS physics]
... Haven't you ever wondered why all higher animals are four-legged and why there is NO SUCH THING AS A 3-LEGGED ANIMAL ??
... It's because the vertebrate animal is in AXIAL QUADRATURE, including the BRAIN !
Correct and also why a three legged tripod always has every leg in contact with the surface.And that is caused by the "3 axis orthogonal structure of space itself"
And how did they come to those conclusions if you are the first to discover the mathematics. Did these people of antiquity that recognized these gods know something then, you just now rediscovered?... AND FINALLY: Hammond has shown that it is supremely obvious to even a casual observer, that because the 2nd order eigenvectors are clearly the "legendary gods of antiquity", that the top final eigenvector is clearly none other than the "God of the Bible" !!
And what has been the follow up from the publication, in 1994 - nearly 30 years ago ?
I would have expected a tsunami of sold out scientific speaking tours
And how did they come to those conclusions if you are the first to discover the mathematics. Did these people of antiquity that recognized these gods know something then, you just now rediscovered?
Something is askew here. To turn a phrase "it doesn't have a leg to stand on".......
does not wish to be associated with any club which has Write4U as a member so do not make me welcomeMichael 345
and expel me forthwithto the club!
Unclear who the above is asking aboutHow old are you? 20, 40, 60, 80 or what?
You don't sound like you've spent 40 years reading history, physics, psychology, theology etc. like I have, or you would KNOW how the ancient gods were known to the population
How much education do you actually have by the way?
Gregor Mendel discovered genetics in 1866 and published it in a journal. But it wasn't until 35 YEARS LATER
should have been known around the world in two days - you know modern timesThere has never been a scientific proof of the gods until HAMMOND discovered it in modern times.
All 5 ladies in Bali enjoy being heckled and am currently battling against numerous COVID-19 rules and regulations (not against them - how to comply with their contradictory requirements) to heckle said ladies in personGo heckle someone else
People, birds and kangaroos aren't 4 legged.Haven't you ever wondered why all higher animals are four-legged
I would argue with your logic, but there is no logic there. There are just (stupendously huge) leaps of faith.The BRAIN is a quadrature, (cube) for the same reason that the LOCOMOTION system of the body is a quadrature (square).
Both are caused by the "3 axis orthogonal structure of space" itself.
... It is because of this cubic structure (a cube has 13 symmetry axes) that there are 13 gods, and the 13 gods yield by "common Factor Analysis" a single top eigenvector, which is obviously what you call THE ABRAHANIC GOD, simply because the lower order eigenvectors are the 13 gods of antiquity.