....
yeah sure!
Let me then reproduce it for the second time my young scallywag!
https://www.astrosociety.org/publications/a-universe-from-nothing/
A Universe from Nothing
by Alexei V. Filippenko and Jay M. Pasachoff
"Insights from modern physics suggest that our wondrous universe may be the ultimate free lunch.
Adapted from The Cosmos: Astronomy in the New Millennium, 1st edition, by Jay M. Pasachoff and Alex Filippenko, © 2001. Reprinted with permission of Brooks/Cole, an imprint of the Wadsworth Group, a division of Thomson Learning.
Courtesy of AURA/NOAO/NSF.
In the inflationary theory, matter, antimatter, and photons were produced by the energy of the false vacuum, which was released following the phase transition. All of these particles consist of positive energy. This energy, however, is exactly balanced by the negative gravitational energy of everything pulling on everything else. In other words, the total energy of the universe is zero! It is remarkable that the universe consists of essentially nothing, but (fortunately for us) in positive and negative parts. You can easily see that gravity is associated with negative energy: If you drop a ball from rest (defined to be a state of zero energy), it gains energy of motion (kinetic energy) as it falls. But this gain is exactly balanced by a larger negative gravitational energy as it comes closer to Earth’s center, so the sum of the two energies remains zero.
I finally took some time just enough to answer these 100% wrong assumptions which rise from mathematical nonsense that does not exist in the real world, only in the mathematics and nothing more and nothing less.
These answers are answers to all posters on the thread, not just to Paddoboy.
This is another 100% irrefutable evidence why none should trust mathematics and statistics, if this what mathematics and statistics are showing was really true there would not be any universe at all-that's one.
Second, just because the sum of positive and negative energy is 0, it doesn't mean thee is no energy at all, there is always energy and the universe still exists as well as the energy in the universe.
If universe was made from nothing there would not be universe and nothing in the unvierse that exists today would simply not exist, I cannot believe that scientists can trust such total BS-that is not science, it's ideology, just like the mathematics and statistics are ideologies.
Third, this example only proves why mathematicians ans those who work with statistics should be forbidden to do any real science when it comes to the universe and its origins: if you drop a ball from the rest-you said this is a zero energy, obviously it's not zero energy if you can gain kinetic energy and both kinetic energy and gravitational energy should nullify their sums, than there would not be any gravity or kinetic energy to exist-what's wrong with you people.
If there was no energy there would not be any kinetic energy and gravitational energy "colliding"-obviously mathematics is 100% wrong here.
Fourfth; you said that the false vacuum and particles are balanced by gravity-again if that was true-there would not be any universe, because there would not be any energy to create the false vacuum and gravity in the first place-this is the same as matter and antimatter-once they collide everything stops to exist, but not the energy, that annihilation simply transforms into energy of radiation-but the point is you can never have matter and antimatter anhiliating as much as you cannot have false vacuum and particles annihilating with gravity-if this totally wrong assumption with gravity and false vacuum was really true, gravity would at least have some different different value from false vacuum-like matter has different charge compared with antimatter-but this is not the case-mathematics is makinf this up.
Fifth, if this was actually true than electrically neutral atom would never be able to exist, since atom's energy is also 0, but again atom still exists, despite his energy is 0, obviously it's not 0.
The idea of a zero-energy universe, together with inflation, suggests that all one needs is just a tiny bit of energy to get the whole thing started (that is, a tiny volume of energy in which inflation can begin). The universe then experiences inflationary expansion, but without creating net energy.
Again another reason why mathematicians are the biggest liars, so much inflation cannot start without so little energy, so much inflation needs immense quantities of energy; because nothing would ever be created in the universe, neither would universe expand so rapidly
-in reality this is simply not possible because no experiment and no direct and no indirect observation has proven such nonsense, all the evidences, all the experiments and all the observations have 100% proven and and non-stop 100% prove that what mathematics say simply is not possible, it's only possible inside the mathematics-and mathematics does not follow reality and real evidences, it's obvious the other way around, evidences follow mathematics-which is totally wrong approach, because you simply adapt those tiny evidences, straws to jusitfy that mathematics is right, and yet is it is dead wrong as always.
Mathematics is not based on reality and on real evidences; mathematics is based on its own reality and on its own so-called evidences which are all created to just succeed that mathematics is right, but the problem is that this is never the case, because what mathematics claims to be proven has NEVER been SHOWN and it's never, ever shown in all the experiments and all the observations-and these are the facts that none wants to talk about.
Mathematics only extends their explanations, although scientists have truly no idea what exactly they proved or disproved/what they have proven or disproven-facts.
What produced the energy before inflation? This is perhaps the ultimate question. As crazy as it might seem, the energy may have come out of nothing! The meaning of “nothing” is somewhat ambiguous here. It might be the vacuum in some pre-existing space and time, or it could be nothing at all – that is, all concepts of space and time were created with the universe itself.
First of all there could be nothing at all-that's the fact, something that does not exist cannot create something that exists-fact, and you will not find this anywhere in the universe, on all levels (from quantum levels to macroscopic levels).
Something that has dimensions cannot exist and expand in nothing that has no dimensions at all!
Space and time are not created in the universe, since what really gravity affacts are trajectories and distances between cosmic objects-if gravity waves were correct than the entire world would simply stretch and contract and everything in it-again this is not the case anwhere in the world or the universe-but even if this was the case-these gravity waves and all thes fields exist in space, so in the universe there is no such thing as space, since you have all kinds of energy fields and matter everywhere in the universe-facts.
And I must add the fact that true space cannopt be detected by anything because it doesn't interact with anything, if is not any substance it is not made of anything-when physicists have done all those experiments with gravitational influences on space and time that suppossedly so-called "proved" that space and time are influenced by gravity-they were detecting interactions with energy fields-true space does not interact with anything since it is absolutely 100% empty, the very fact that there were interactions shown in all those experiments, 100% proves that I'm right when I'm posting here that experiments have proven that gravity/gravitational effects do not affect space in any way on any level in an form and in any etc., because true space cannot be interacted by anything since it is 100% empty and cannot and does not interact with energy, matter, energy fields, all forms of waves including gravity waves and everything else.
All those waves interact with energy fields, matter and etc. they do not interact with something that is 100% empty and does not contain anything and it is not made of anything-that's a key difference between true space and space that physicists are talking about-the pseudo-space that physicists are talking about is made of energy matter, energy fields or whatever, and does interact with everything in the universe, but true space which is absolutely 100% empty does not interact with anything, and the universal pseudo-space exists in true space-facts.
Because even if everything of the following is true (but it's not true at all, it's pure mathematical lie), you cannot have something to be created, exist and expand if there is nothing where it can be created, exist and expand in the first place!
It's like examples with electrically neutral atom and matter and antimatter annihiliation that I posted above as examples why such reasoning is not based on science and it is not based on scientific evidences, but on mathematical pseudo-wonderworld of fiction and fantasy.
It's so obvious that physicists are 100% wrong, and that their mathematics is BS.
End of part 1....
