The "Big Bang" and Random-Universe Theory

Believability is irrelevant. Does your model fit the observed facts better than the current model fits the observed facts?
 
Michael Anteski said:
One point I want to emphasize,as to the believability of my model for the Ether, is the incontrovertible fact that it is the only theory available, of any type quantal or etheric, that can rationally account for Quantum Entanglement.
Click to expand...
And as the history is science shows, that is no reason to believe in a theory.

Just like when Newton refused to use mechanism in order to develop gravitation, so too having a neat hypothesis that explains physical phenomena does nothing for advancing physics if if cannot capture the measurable behavior of physical systems as well as existing theories.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top